《Chainalysis:2024年加密貨幣調研報告:關于全球政府對加密貨幣發展前景的洞察(英文版)(35頁).pdf》由會員分享,可在線閱讀,更多相關《Chainalysis:2024年加密貨幣調研報告:關于全球政府對加密貨幣發展前景的洞察(英文版)(35頁).pdf(37頁珍藏版)》請在三個皮匠報告上搜索。
1、The 2024 State of Cryptocurrency Investigations ReportGlobal survey insights on government agencies crypto outlook0 Not Investment or Other AdviceThis material is for informational purposes only,and may contain forward-looking statements that concern our expectations,strategy,plans or intentions,whi
2、ch are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties.This material is not intended to provide legal,tax,financial,investment,regulatory or other professional advice,nor is it to be relied upon as a professional opinion.Recipients should consult their own advisors before making these types of decisions
3、.Chainalysis does not guarantee or warrant the accuracy,completeness,timeliness,suitability or validity of the information herein,and assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect any circumstances that may arise after the date such statements are made.Chainalysis has no
4、responsibility or liability for any decision made or any other acts or omissions in connection with Recipients use of this material.Table of ContentsExecutive summary3Who are our survey respondents?4Perceptions of cryptocurrency9Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view15Conclusion
5、:Equip your agency for cryptocurrency investigations34 Executive summaryCryptocurrency is an increasingly important topic for the public sector across law enforcement,regulatory,and military agencies.Why?Because when a new technology is growing and gaining traction in the way crypto has,its the publ
6、ic sectors job to ensure that technology is a net benefit to constituents,and that society can reap its rewards while minimizing its downsides.Cryptocurrency is growing because it enables millions of people around the world to transact how and when they want,without middlemen,and take greater contro
7、l of their finances.As is the case with any useful new technology though,criminals have also begun to exploit crypto for nefarious purposes.These illicit use cases extend beyond the forms of cybercrime we typically think of as crypto-native,such as ransomware and darknet markets,and include everythi
8、ng from intellectual property crime to conventional drug trafficking.The complex issues cryptocurrency presents to these agencies were at the forefront of our minds when we launched our second ever State of Cryptocurrency Investigations Survey.We designed the survey to determine how public sector em
9、ployees around the world feel about cryptocurrency both the technology itself and their own ability to understand and investigate crypto asset activity.Well share the results of that survey in the following report,in the hopes that the findings can help our industry work together with the public sec
10、tor more effectively.Here are a few key takeaways from our surveys findings:While law enforcement respondents said that cryptocurrency is relevant to many of their investigations,they hold mostly positive views on cryptocurrency overall.Latin America and EMEA respondents are the most optimistic abou
11、t cryptocurrencys role in the future of financial markets,while APAC respondents have more negative perceptions.Respondents expect cryptocurrency to be involved with more cases across a wider variety of criminal activities over the next five years.Investigations of cryptocurrency-related crimes take
12、 longer than other crimes,but blockchain analysis tools like Chainalysis aid in the evidence-gathering process,and boost confidence in their ability to solve these crimes.About half of respondents are dissatisfied with the staffing and technical resources available for solving cryptocurrency-related
13、 crime.Keep reading for our full breakdown of the results of our 2024 State of Cryptocurrency Investigations Survey.Executive summary 3 Who are our survey respondents?Over 800 public sector employees from around the world responded to our survey.Well break down their basic demographic information be
14、low.Regions where respondents live and workAPAC dominates our survey profile,accounting for 44.3%of all respondents.North America and EMEA had strong showings as well.About one-quarter of respondents declined to share their location.Who are our survey respondents?4 Country where respondents live and
15、 workIf we zoom in on the home country of our respondents,we see that South Korea leads the way among those who chose to share their location.The United States,Japan,and Singapore follow.Those four countries,along with those who chose not to share their location,make up roughly 80%of respondents,whi
16、le the remainder is split between several countries.Who are our survey respondents?5 Who are our survey respondents?6RegionCountryNo.of respondentsNorth AmericaUnited States118Canada34Cayman Islands1Latin AmericaBrazil7Colombia5Argentina2Mexico2Panama1APACRepublic of Korea156Japan111Singapore65Austr
17、alia24Vietnam6Indonesia3Malaysia3Philippines2Mongolia1New Zealand1Tajikistan1Thailand1EMEAUnited Kingdom15Germany12Switzerland8Poland7RegionCountryNo.of respondentsEMEANetherlands5South Africa5Austria4Belgium3Italy3Spain3Sweden3Estonia2Ireland2Latvia2Portugal2Serbia2Bulgaria1Denmark1Finland1Greece1L
18、iberia1Liechtenstein1Nigeria1Qatar1Slovakia1Slovenia1UnknownUnknown212 Agency type and years of experienceType of public sector agency where respondents workOver half of our respondents work in law enforcement agencies.Most of those come from regional,state,or local agencies,at 39.5%of all responden
19、ts,while 27.5%of all respondents come from national law enforcement agencies.National civilian agencies are next with 11.7%of respondents.Nearly half of our respondents work as investigators,which is by far the most well-represented job function amongst our respondents.Most of those investigators fo
20、cus specifically on financial crimes or cyber crimes,though many also cover general criminal activity.Respondents in other roles also skew toward financial and cyber crime in their focus.Who are our survey respondents?7 Job profile and/or area of responsibility for respondentsFinally,our respondents
21、 boast a range of experience,with a mix of relative newcomers and long-tenured veterans.Overall,more than half of respondents have been in the field for five or more years.Years in the fieldWho are our survey respondents?8 Perceptions of cryptocurrencyCryptocurrencys utility and role in societyOur f
22、irst round of questions asked respondents about their perceptions of cryptocurrency,both broadly and in the context of their investigations.In total,more than half of all respondents slightly agreed or strongly agreed that cryptocurrency is a valid form of currency.Responses varied significantly by
23、region.EMEA respondents were the most sold on cryptos validity,with 72.4%of respondents strongly or slightly agreeing with the statement given.In APAC,on the other hand,that number was just 51.9%.Similarly,67.7%of APAC respondents strongly or slightly agreed that cryptocurrency is mainly used by cri
24、minals and malicious actors.I believe cryptocurrency is mainly used by criminals and other malicious actorsAPAC wasnt alone here.Overall,more than half of all respondents agreed with that statement.North America and EMEA though notably didnt hold that sentiment,with under one third of respondents in
25、 each region agreeing with the statement given.Despite a widespread belief amongst respondents that crypto is mainly used by criminals,roughly half said they believe cryptocurrency will become widely adopted by the general population.Perceptions of cryptocurrency 9 I believe cryptocurrency will beco
26、me widely adopted by the general populationResponses were generally similar across regions,with the notable exception of Latin America.There,respondents were much more confident in cryptos future growth potential,with over three quarters stating their belief that the asset class would see wide adopt
27、ion.Responses to our next question on cryptocurrencys societal benefits followed a similar pattern:Roughly half of respondents agreed that crypto will positively impact our financial system.This is quite interesting when taken together with the belief that crypto today is mainly used by criminals.Pe
28、rceptions of cryptocurrency 10 I believe cryptocurrency will advance our financial system in a positive wayAgain,Latin American respondents were the most bullish on cryptocurrencys potential to improve our financial system,with 70.6%strongly or slightly agreeing with the given statement.This optimis
29、m aligns with findings from our 2023 Geography of Cryptocurrency Report,which highlights that Latin America is experiencing rapid growth in cryptocurrency usage due to factors such as high inflation rates,currency devaluation,and a need for financial inclusion.The regions enthusiasm for cryptocurren
30、cy could be a reflection of these economic realities and underscores the potential for digital assets to provide viable financial solutions in challenging environments.Perceptions of cryptocurrency 11 Cryptocurrency in the investigative context We saw much greater variance by region when we asked re
31、spondents to rate their own understanding of cryptocurrency.How would you describe your level of understanding of cryptocurrency?Respondents from APAC,who tended to hold more pessimistic views on cryptocurrencys validity and role in our financial system,described themselves having a lower level of u
32、nderstanding compared to respondents from other regions 42.0%of respondents from the region said they were not very knowledgeable on the asset class.Respondents from EMEA showed the highest confidence in cryptocurrency understanding,with 62.5%describing themselves as very knowledgeable or extremely
33、knowledgeable.North America and Latin America lagged slightly behind EMEA on this question,but respondents were still generally confident in their understanding of crypto.Personal feelings and level of understanding aside,respondents were loud and clear in their belief that cryptocurrency matters to
34、 their investigations.57.3%of all respondents strongly agreed with that belief,with another 29.9%saying they slightly agreed.Perceptions of cryptocurrency 12 I believe that cryptocurrency matters to my investigationsAPAC respondents were once again a slight outlier here,as a much higher share said t
35、hey only slightly agreed that crypto is relevant to investigations versus strongly agreeing.Respondents were similarly unified in their belief that their agencies should invest more resources into the ability to investigate cryptocurrency-related crime.Perceptions of cryptocurrency 13 I believe that
36、 cryptocurrency is something that my agency should invest resources into investigatingOverall,90.9%strongly or slightly agreed that their agencies should invest more resources into investigating cryptocurrency-related cases.Perceptions of cryptocurrency 14 Cryptocurrency investigations today:The pub
37、lic sectors viewWe asked our public sector respondents a series of questions on their experience carrying out cryptocurrency investigations.Time to solve caseWe asked respondents how long the average cryptocurrency-related case takes them to bring to a legal resolution,compared to the average case i
38、nvolving traditional financial crime and the average case involving non-financial crime.How much time(measured in months)does it take you/your agency to bring a crime to prosecution/resolution?Overall,respondents said that cryptocurrency-related cases take longer to solve compared to traditional fin
39、ancial and non-financial cases.While many cases across all types are resolved in under one month,cryptocurrency-related cases were more likely to extend beyond six months and even more likely to take over a year.On average,responses indicate that cryptocurrency-related cases take 8.5 months to solve
40、,whereas traditional finance-related cases take 7.3 months,and non-financial cases take 5.3 months.This suggests that the complexity of cryptocurrency-related investigations could be a contributing factor to their longer resolution times.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 15
41、 Forms of crime where investigators see cryptocurrencyNext,we asked all respondents to name the types of crimes where they see a cryptocurrency nexus.The results vary significantly by region.What crime types are you seeing involving cryptocurrency?Percentage of respondents in each region who reporte
42、d observing the crime involving cryptocurrencyCryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 16 In general,respondents most often pointed to fraud,scams,cybercrime,and drug-related offenses as the forms of crime where they encounter cases with a cryptocurrency nexus.These crime types we
43、re also disproportionately named by respondents from North America and EMEA.EMEA respondents were also particularly likely to name ransomware as a crypto-adjacent crime type they encounter 71.6%of EMEA respondents reporting ransomware cases,followed by 49.7%of North America respondents.This could be
44、 due to the higher prevalence of ransomware attacks in these regions,often targeting critical infrastructure and businesses.Latin America stood apart from other regions in several categories,leading the way in the share of respondents naming sanctions evasion,benefits fraud,threat finance,securities
45、 breaches,kidnapping,insider threat,homicide,and elections offenses as crime types where theyve encountered cases with a crypto nexus.This diverse range of crime types may be reflective of the regions complex socio-economic landscape,where high inflation,currency instability,and limited access to tr
46、aditional financial services drive both legitimate and illicit use of cryptocurrencies.APAC responses were mostly in line with those from other regions.However,a disproportionate share of respondents from the region named cybercrime and threat finance as forms of crime where theyve encountered cases
47、 with a crypto nexus.This might be due to the regions digital growth and the corresponding rise in cyber threats and financial crimes.What other forms of crime does crypto touch?We asked respondents what other forms of crime theyve encountered cryptocurrency in during their investigations.The word c
48、loud below provides a sampling of their most frequent responses.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 17 Frequency of cryptocurrency artifacts in investigationsIn the context of an investigation,cryptocurrency artifacts would refer to any item or information discovered that wou
49、ld link the crime or an involved party with cryptocurrency.Artifacts can include written cryptocurrency addresses or seed phrase lists,or the presence of crypto-related software on a suspects computer or phone.Across all regions,respondents indicated that they discover cryptocurrency artifacts in 33
50、.6%of all cases they investigate.By region:What percentage of your investigations include cryptocurrency artifacts(e.g.crypto addresses,seed phrase lists,etc.)?Numbers vary by region.EMEA led the way,with respondents indicating 47.1%of investigations include a cryptocurrency artifact,while APAC resp
51、ondents indicated the lowest rate of all regions at 26.0%.These numbers highlight the increasing prevalence of cryptocurrency and its involvement in various forms of crime over the past few years.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 18 By agency type:What percentage of your in
52、vestigations include cryptocurrency artifacts(e.g.crypto addresses,seed phrase lists,etc.)?When examining the data by agency type rather than region,sub-national tax authorities report the highest instance of cryptocurrency artifacts in their investigations,as one might expect given their mandate,at
53、 45.3%.Military and defense agency respondents report the lowest rate at 19.0%,likely reflecting their primary focus on different types of threats and criminal activities.Does the public sector have what it needs to conduct cryptocurrency investigations?StaffingFirst,we asked respondents how satisfi
54、ed or dissatisfied they were with staffing resources for cryptocurrency investigations.Their responses suggest theres significant work to be done.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 19 How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the staffing resources available to you to adequ
55、ately investigate crimes involving cryptocurrency?Overall,more than half of all respondents said they were either extremely dissatisfied or somewhat dissatisfied with their agencys staffing resources available for crypto investigation.North American respondents had the lowest dissatisfaction rates,w
56、ith 48.2%reporting as extremely or somewhat dissatisfied,and 31.2%reporting the opposite extremely or somewhat satisfied.EMEA and Latin America respondents expressed the highest rates of dissatisfaction,with Latin America reporting lower levels of satisfaction overall,as more respondents reported be
57、ing neither satisfied nor dissatisfied.Access to specialistsRespondents reported slightly higher levels of satisfaction with their ability to bring in specialized investigators to help with crypto investigations,though sentiment varied widely by region.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public
58、sectors view 20 How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your agencys access to investigators that specialize in cryptocurrency?In North America,for example,40.8%of respondents said they were either somewhat or extremely satisfied with their access to crypto specialist investigators.The next-close
59、st region was EMEA at 29.8%.In Latin America,on the other hand,70.6%of respondents reported being either somewhat or extremely dissatisfied with access to specialists.Overall,three key trends emerge:General dissatisfaction:There is a clear need for increased staffing and better resources across the
60、board for crypto investigations.Agencies should consider hiring more staff to address this gap.Specialist shortage:Even with slightly better satisfaction levels,access to specialists remains a significant issue,particularly in Latin America.Developing more training programs to create specialist inve
61、stigators can ensure better access to expertise.Regional needs:Different regions have varying levels of satisfaction and dissatisfaction,indicating that tailored approaches may be needed to address specific regional challenges.Understanding the unique challenges faced in different regions is crucial
62、 for a tailored response.Technical resourcesRespondents were generally less positive about the technical resources available to them for crypto investigations.Across all regions,just 25.3%of respondents reported being extremely satisfied or somewhat satisfied with technical resources,while many were
63、 neutral.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 21 How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the technological resources available to you to adequately investigate crimes involving cryptocurrency?North America and EMEA expressed the highest satisfaction rates,with North America
64、 showing relatively better access to technical resources.Latin America had the highest dissatisfaction rates,indicating a significant need for improved technological infrastructure.APAC had similar dissatisfaction rates levels to EMEA,but with more respondents being neutral,suggesting uncertainty or
65、 lack of access to adequate resources.Overall,the data indicates a clear need for enhanced technical resources in many regions,particularly in Latin America and APAC.Investing in advanced technology is essential to address the gaps respondents indicate are impacting their ability to be effective.Tra
66、ining and educational opportunitiesSatisfaction rates for training and educational opportunities in crypto investigations largely followed the same patterns as other resourcing questions.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 22 How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the tra
67、ining and educational opportunities available to you to adequately investigate crimes involving cryptocurrency?North America and EMEA led in satisfaction rates,with EMEA respondents showing lower dissatisfaction levels than for technical resources.Latin America and APAC expressed the highest levels
68、of dissatisfaction,indicating a need for more comprehensive training programs.Zooming in on the United States:Perceptions of cryptocurrency investigation resources by regionBelow,we show the results of the questions above on resourcing for U.S.respondents only,broken down by region.11 Regions for U.
69、S.respondents are broken down as follows:Northeast:Includes Connecticut,Maine,Massachusetts,New Hampshire,Rhode Island,Vermont,New Jersey,New York,and Pennsylvania.Midwest:Includes Illinois,Indiana,Michigan,Ohio,Wisconsin,Iowa,Kansas,Minnesota,Missouri,Nebraska,North Dakota,and South Dakota.South:In
70、cludes Delaware,Florida,Georgia,Maryland,North Carolina,South Carolina,Virginia,Washington,D.C.,West Virginia,Alabama,Kentucky,Mississippi,Tennessee,Arkansas,Louisiana,Oklahoma,and Texas.West:Includes Arizona,Colorado,Idaho,Montana,Nevada,New Mexico,Utah,Wyoming,Alaska,California,Hawaii,Oregon,and W
71、ashington.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 23 How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the staffing resources available to you to adequately investigate crimes involving cryptocurrency?How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your agencys access to investigators that s
72、pecialize in cryptocurrency?Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 24 How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the technological resources available to you to adequately investigate crimes involving cryptocurrency?How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the training and edu
73、cational opportunities available to you to adequately investigate crimes involving cryptocurrency?Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 25 Summary of findingsAcross all U.S.regions,respondents expressed the highest levels of satisfaction with training and educational opportunit
74、ies in crypto investigations.Despite overall satisfaction with training,respondents were generally less satisfied with the staffing resources available to them.The Northeast generally showed the most satisfaction with available resources,except for staffing.Other regions displayed similar patterns o
75、f high satisfaction with training but lower satisfaction with staffing.Key insights and recommendations for North AmericaThe consistent pattern of high satisfaction with training and lower satisfaction with staffing suggests a need for balanced investment in both areas.Based on industry best practic
76、es and the collective insights from our survey,agencies should consider the following steps:Build capacity through training and technology:Enhancing recruitment efforts to boost staffing levels is crucial.Additionally,agencies should focus on building capacity through comprehensive training programs
77、 and the use of advanced technologies.Ensuring that investigators are well-versed in the latest tools and techniques can significantly enhance their effectiveness.Adopt best practices across regions:Regions with higher satisfaction,such as the Northeast,can serve as models for other areas.Sharing su
78、ccessful training programs and resource management strategies can help achieve more consistent satisfaction levels nationwide.Foster collaborative partnerships:Building partnerships with local institutions and private sector organizations can provide additional support,intelligence and expertise.Thi
79、s collaborative approach can enhance overall satisfaction and effectiveness in crypto investigations.Respondents views on their agencys crypto investigation capabilitiesWe asked respondents several questions on their agencies overall crypto investigation capabilities,and the steps theyve taken to im
80、prove those capabilities.The results of those questions are shown below,broken down by agency type.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 26 Perception of agencys capabilities to investigate cryptocurrency-related crimeOverall,national security respondents were most likely to sa
81、y their agency is well-equipped to investigate crypto-related crime,with 60.0%of respondents agreeing.No other agency type broke 50.0%on this question,and many agency types sat below 40.0%.National security respondents were also the most likely to say that their agency was innovative in adopting new
82、 technologies,highlighting the importance of these technologies in enhancing investigative capabilities.Across all agency types,less than half of respondents said their agency had dedicated crypto investigators.Military and defense respondents scored the lowest on this metric,with just 10.0%reportin
83、g the presence of dedicated crypto analysts.Regional and state tax regulators also scored low at 31.8%.Given that most respondents expect cryptos role in crime to grow over the next five years as adoption increases,agencies may need to consider hiring more specialized cryptocurrency investigators or
84、 partnering with firms that can provide embedded crypto investigators.This proactive approach can help address the anticipated challenges and ensure agencies are prepared for the evolving landscape of crypto-related crime.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 27 Training for cr
85、ypto investigations was the area where agency types expressed the most positivity.More than half of respondents from nearly all agency types reported receiving some form of training.The one exception was regional and state tax regulatory agencies,where 45.5%of respondents said theyve received traini
86、ng.Respondents explain:Why are agencies well-equipped or not well-equipped to investigate cryptocurrency-based crime?We gave respondents the option to explain in their own words why they felt their agency was either well-equipped or not well-equipped to investigate cryptocurrency-based crime.Well-eq
87、uipped agenciesThe word cloud below shows the high-level trends in what respondents who believed their agencies are well-equipped said.Less well-equipped agenciesWe also asked respondents who said they thought their agency wasnt well-equipped to investigate cryptocurrency-based crime to explain why.
88、The word cloud for those responses is below.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 28 Are respondents using blockchain analysis tools?In this context,blockchain analysis tools such as Chainalysis and other paid tools that enable users to explore crypto address activity and visua
89、lize the flow of funds on the blockchain.It does not include free block explorers such as Etherscan,Breadcrumbs,and OSINT.Are you using analytics tools for cryptocurrency investigations?Overall,60.5%of respondents reported using blockchain analysis tools.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The publi
90、c sectors view 29 How analytics tools impact the ability to solve cryptocurrency-related crimeWe asked respondents a series of questions related to how confident they are in investigating cryptocurrency-related crime,and broke down the results by whether or not the respondents used blockchain analys
91、is tools like Chainalysis in their crypto investigations.Overall,respondents who use blockchain analysis tools reported greater comfort and confidence in their ability to solve crypto-related cases.Sentiments regarding cryptocurrency investigationsCryptocurrency investigations today:The public secto
92、rs view 30 Looking ahead:Respondents on the future of cryptocurrency investigationsIncreased prevalence of cryptocurrency in casesOverall,respondents were mostly united in their belief that cryptocurrency will continue to come up in more of their cases over the next five years.Cryptocurrencies will
93、appear in a higher volume of cases in the next 5 yearsAcross all agency types,over 95.0%of respondents said they believe its either somewhat likely or very likely that theyll see cryptocurrency appear in more of their cases over the next five years.Most respondents,except those from military and def
94、ense agencies,consider this increase very likely.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 31 Respondents across all agencies also said that they expect cryptocurrency to appear in a wider variety of crimes over the next five years.Cryptocurrencies will appear in a wider variety of
95、 crime types in the next 5 yearsCryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view 32 Impact of increased crypto adoption on investigationsRespondents believe that overall,increased crypto adoption will make investigations more difficult.Cryptocurrency adoption will make effectively investi
96、gating crime harder to accomplish in the next 5 yearsAt least 75.0%of respondents across all agencies said it was either somewhat or very likely that increased crypto adoption would make investigations more difficult in the next five years.Cryptocurrency investigations today:The public sectors view
97、33 Conclusion:Equip your agency for cryptocurrency investigationsOur survey results provide cause for optimism but also highlight the significant work needed to improve the public sectors capabilities for cryptocurrency investigation.While many respondents believe in the potential of cryptocurrency
98、to enhance the global financial system,they also acknowledge the growing abuse of crypto by criminals as adoption increases.Despite recognizing the importance of addressing crypto-related crime,most respondents feel their agencies are not well-equipped for these investigations,citing a lack of staff
99、ing and technical resources.By highlighting these gaps,we hope this survey serves as a catalyst for government agencies around the world to invest in the necessary tools and training to build skilled and confident crypto investigators.Implementing blockchain analysis solutions and providing comprehe
100、nsive training are essential first steps.The data clearly shows that public sector employees with access to these resources are more effective in solving cryptocurrency-related crimes.Continued investment in advanced technology and training can make cryptocurrency-related crime as manageable as any
101、other form of crime,if not more so.Are you prepared?To help your agency evaluate its preparedness in tackling cryptocurrency investigations,consider the following questions:Staffing and expertiseDo we have dedicated crypto investigators on our team?Are our investigators trained in the latest blockch
102、ain analysis techniques?Technological resourcesDo we have access to blockchain analysis capabilities?Are our current resources sufficient to handle complex crypto investigations?Training and developmentAre we providing ongoing training for our investigators?Are our team members trained and certified
103、 in blockchain analysis?Partnerships and collaborationAre we collaborating with other agencies and/or provide sector experts to enhance our investigative capabilities and intelligence?Do we have access to professional expertise when needed?Managing crypto casesHow effective are we in tracing and ana
104、lyzing crypto transactions?Do we have access to the right data and actionable intelligence to gain a strategic advantage in our investigations?Are we prepared for the anticipated increase in crypto-related cases over the next five years?Conclusion 34 How we can helpNavigating the complexities of cry
105、ptocurrency investigations requires a complete solution comprising data,technology,training and expertise.With a comprehensive approach to blockchain analysis,agencies can leverage on-chain intelligence to effectively discover,analyze,and pursue cryptocurrency-related crimes.$11 billion+in illicit f
106、unds weve helped law enforcement recover65,000+real-world services weve identified1 billion+addresses clustered1,200+global partners collaborating and sharing intelligence dailyFor more information on how we can help,including how to get started with specialized training programs,visit our Crypto In
107、vestigations Solution page or contact us for a personalized discussion.Conclusion 35 Building trust in blockchainsAbout ChainalysisChainalysis,the leader in blockchain intelligence,makes it easy to connect the movement of digital assets to real-world services.Organizations can track illicit activity,manage risk exposure,and develop innovative market solution