《Common Sense：2024 AI時代來臨：青少年與家長在家校環境中對生成式AI的采納與態度研究報告（英文版）（56頁）.pdf》由會員分享，可在線閱讀，更多相關《Common Sense：2024 AI時代來臨：青少年與家長在家校環境中對生成式AI的采納與態度研究報告（英文版）（56頁）.pdf（56頁珍藏版）》請在三個皮匠報告上搜索。

1、2024The Dawn of the AI Era:Teens,Parents,and the Adoption of Generative AI at Home and SchoolCOMMON SENSE IS GRATEFUL FOR THE GENEROUS SUPPORT AND UNDERWRITING THAT FUNDED THIS RESEARCH REPORTCarnegie Corporation of New York Craig Newmark Philanthropies Jennifer Caldwell and John H.N.Fisher Patrick

2、J.McGovern Foundation Siegel Family Endowment 2024The Dawn of the AI Era:Teens,Parents,and the Adoption of Generative AI at Home and SchoolSuggested citation:Madden,M.,Calvin,A.,Hasse,A.,&Lenhart,A.(2024).The dawn of the AI era:Teens,parents,and the adoption of generative AI at home and school.San F

3、rancisco,CA:Common Sense.The report authors and project team would like to express their gratitude to all the young people and their parents who gave their time to take the survey.CreditsAcknowledgments:This project represents the work of many people from Common Sense Media and beyond.Below,we detai

4、l each part of the project and the contributors.Amanda Lenhart and Mary Madden,with support from Angela Calvin and Alexa Hasse.Thanks to Julie Valdivia for her assistance with the survey translation.Survey development and design:Ipsos U.S.Public AffairsData collection:Angela Calvin,Alexa Hasse,Amand

5、a Lenhart,and Mary MaddenData analysis and interpretation:Mary Madden,Angela Calvin,and Alexa Hasse,with support from Amanda LenhartReport writing:Christian Medina Beltz,Kirsten Olsen Cahill,Lisa Cohen,Natalia Garcia,and Marisa Naughton Communications:Naomi Baron,Celeste Kidd,Jasmine McNealy,and Lee

6、 RainieProject advisors:Eisha Buch,Daniel Vargas Campos,Amina Fazlullah,Tracy Pizzo Frey,Jeffrey Knutson,Merve Lapus,Jasmine Hood Miller,Ellen Pack,and Yvette RenteriaInternal review:Alice SeilerDesigner:Christopher Dare and Jennifer RobbCopy editors:Table of ContentsIntroduction.1Key Findings.4Part

7、 1:How Teens and Parents Use Generative AI Tools.17How and Why Teens Use Generative AI .20Part 2:How Teens Use and Experience AI in School and for School .25Generative AI in the Classroom.26Generative AI School Rules and Policies .31Part 3:Generative AI in Education:Exploring the Benefits,Risks,and

8、Impacts on Equity with Teens and Parents .34Part 4:How Generative AI Changes Youth and Parent Perspectives on the Future .43Conclusion.47Methodology .491 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.When OpenAIs Chat

9、GPT platform was released to the public in November 2022,many pundits and politicians were quick to herald the great promise of generative AI.1 Other promi-nent voices swiftly highlighted the potential pitfalls of this new technology:Economists warned of a rapid loss of jobs due to automation,2 and

10、nonprofits highlighted the risks of unfet-tered development without guardrails.Global leaders expressed concern that society would face existential risks3 associated with an unprecedented deluge of disinformation,normalization of bias,and longer-term threats to human agency.However,while these debat

11、es about potential impacts played out,educational institutions were thrust onto the front lines in navigating this change overnight.Many of the immediate impacts of ChatGPT and other genera-tive AI tools that followed suit were felt in colleges and K12 schools,where students quickly found they could

12、 retrieve months worth of research and writing in a matter of seconds.Teachers were left scrambling4 to identify whether students had submitted AI-generated content as original work,and stu-dents posted scores of tutorials on social media describing ways to circumvent tools designed to detect AI-dri

13、ven plagiarism.More recently,schools have faced emerging challenges that include generative AI content being used to impersonate staff5 and the amplification of various forms of harassment,including the production of deepfake imagery of students.6At the same time,schools have also been a testing gro

14、und for experimentation with the positive potential for generative AI to augment and support student learning.Recent studies have suggested that initial fears about widespread increases in cheating may have been overblown,7 and national surveys that report students attitudes about acceptable uses of

15、 gen AI tools in school suggest8 that most consider them to be accept-able partners for research and editorial support,but draw the line at generating essays on their behalf.Some schools and districts that initially rejected any use of ChatGPT later shifted to embrace the tool9 so that teachers and

16、students could learn to integrate it into the classroom.At the university level,many schools have issued guidance to students and teachers,and have suggested a range of beneficial use cases,10 such as brainstorming new ideas,practicing a new language,developing lesson plans,helping to write and corr

17、ect computer code,and identifying patterns in large data sets.Introduction1 Rotman,D.(2023,March 25).ChatGPT is about to revolutionize the economy.We need to decide what that looks like.MIT Technology Review.https:/ Greenhouse,S.(2023,February 8).US experts warn AI likely to kill off jobsand widen w

18、ealth inequality.The Guardian.https:/ Roose,K.(2023,May 30).AI poses risk of extinction,industry leaders warn.The New York Times.https:/ 4 Meckler,L.,&Verma,P.(2022,December 28).Teachers are on alert for inevitable cheating after release of ChatGPT.The Washington Post.https:/ Griffith,K.,&Fenton,J.(

19、2024,April 25).Ex-athletic director accused of framing principal with AI arrested at airport with gun.The Baltimore Banner.https:/ Hadero,H.(2023,December 2).Teen girls are being victimized by deepfake nudes.One family is pushing for more protections.The Seattle Times.https:/ Spector,C.(2023,October

20、 31).What do AI chatbots really mean for students and cheating?Stanford Graduate School of Education.https:/ed.stanford.edu/news/what-do-ai-chatbots-really-mean-students-and-cheating 8 Sidoti,O.,&Gottfried,J.(2023,November 16).About 1 in 5 U.S.teens whove heard of ChatGPT have used it for schoolwork

21、.Pew Research Center.https:/www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/11/16/about-1-in-5-us-teens-whove-heard-of-chatgpt-have-used-it-for-schoolwork/9 Jones,B.,Tour,M.,&Perez Jr.,J.(2023,August 23).More schools want your kids to use ChatGPT.Really.Politico.https:/ Center for Teaching Innovation.(2023).Ge

22、nerative artificial intelligence.Cornell University.https:/teaching.cornell.edu/generative-artificial-intelligenceTHE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 2 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Summary of methodology This is a nationally representat

23、ive survey that includes responses from 1,045 general population U.S.adults(age 18 or older)who are parents or guardians of one or more teens age 13 to 18,and responses from one of these teens.All 18-year-old respondents were still in high school.Paired(dyad)parent and teen surveys included response

24、s from 1,045 adolescents age 13 to 18 and oversamples to obtain 250 Black and 300 Latino teen respondents.Data was collected by Ipsos Public Affairs on behalf of Common Sense Media from March to May 2024.The survey was conducted online,in English or Spanish.Differences between subgroups were tested

25、for statistical significance at the level of p .05.Total amounts may not sum to 100%from the reported subtotals due to rounding and nonresponse.For additional details,please see the Methodology section of this report.Yet even with all the added power of data collection and syn-thesis,the future of g

26、enerative AI tools is still uncertain.Many questions remain about what will happen to critical skills,like decision-making and writing.Others wonder how human intelligence and our capacity for creativity and learning might change alongside these powerful agents.Acknowledging these and other open que

27、stions,the U.S.Department of Education released guidance last fall that raised a number of inquiries about the quality of the underlying data used to train large language models and the resulting tendency to produce biased results.11 And as with many commercial technology applications used in school

28、s,teachers and administrators must consider the privacy implications of student and institutional data that may be collected through their engagement with gen AI platforms.12 This research report is intended to provide additional data and support for those who are developing educational,research,and

29、 policy initiatives to better understand and represent the interests of middle and high school students and their parents or guardians at a time of great debate over the integration of artificial intelligence technologies in schools.Drawing on new,nationally representative survey data from 1,045 tee

30、ns and their parents,the findings illustrate the growing role of gen-erative AI platforms in the lives of families today.Parents and their teens awareness and use of generative AI differ,as do their attitudes about the perceived effects of these technologies on education,learning,and work.These atti

31、tudes vary significantly based on the level of experience that respondents have had with these AI tools,a familys racial and ethnic background,and their socioeconomic status.Generally speaking,young people and their caregivers recog-nize a mix of potential benefits and risks associated with educatio

32、nal applications of generative AI platforms,and many think these technologies will impact their future education plans and job prospects.11 Office of Educational Technology.(2023,May).Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning:Insights and recommendations.U.S.Department of Educa

33、tion.https:/tech.ed.gov/files/2023/05/ai-future-of-teaching-and-learning-report.pdf12 Division of Information Technology.(2023,May 26).Using generative AI while respecting privacy.University of Maryland.https:/it.umd.edu/news/using-generative-ai-while-respecting-privacyTHE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,P

34、ARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 4 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.1.Seven in 10 teens age 13 to 18 say they have used at least one type of generative AI tool.Search engines with AI-generated results and chatbots are considerably more popular than image-and video-ge

35、nerating tools.Similar to the dramatic growth of social media,most teens have been quick to adopt generative AI tools.Unlike other digital technologies,the use of generative AIincluding search engines with AI-generated results,chatbots,and text generators as well as image and video generatorsis cons

36、is-tent across teens of all ages,genders,and racial and ethnic backgrounds.And while 70%of teens say they have used at least one type of gen AI tool,teens with a parent who has a college degree are significantly more likely than those with a parent who has not completed college to have used at least

37、 one type of generative AI(74%vs.66%).Among teens age 13 to 18,AI-supported search and chatbots are more likely to be used,while image and video generators are less common:56%of teens say they have used search engines with AI-generated results,such as Bing,Google SGE,or Brave Summarizer.51%have used

38、 chatbots/text generators,such as ChatGPT,Google Gemini,or Snaps My AI.34%have used image generators,such as DALL-E,Photoshop AI,or Bing Image Creator.22%of teens have used AI video generators,such as Midjourney,Stable Diffusion,or Google VideoPoet.Teens most often use AI-supported search Percent of

39、 teens who use the following types of generative AI toolsVideo generatorsImage generators Chatbots Search engines20%16%20%11%13%27%6%7%21%10%5%7%Daily Several Times Per Week A Few Times Per Month or Less56%51%34%22%NETNote:Total amounts may not sum to 100%from the reported subtotals due to rounding

40、and nonresponse.Q:How often,if ever,have you used the following kinds of generative AI systems?The respondents included in this chart were 1,045 young people age 1318.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.Notewort

41、hy differences emerge based on race/ethnicity in the type of generative AI tools used.Black and Latino teens are significantly more likely to use image and video generators compared to their White peers(39%of Black teens and 40%of Latino teens vs.30%of White teens for image generators,and 32%of Blac

42、k teens and 31%of Latino teens vs.16%of White teens for video generators).Key Findings5 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.In keeping with historical patterns for mobile phones and other screen media,Black

43、and Latino teens are more likely to engage in a wider variety of activities with gen AI than their White peers.13 Larger shares of both Black and Latino youth compared with White youth say they have used generative AI tools to:Create content as a joke or to tease another person(24%of Black teens and

44、 24%of Latino teens vs.15%of White teens)Help them plan an activity(24%and 22%vs.10%)Keep them company(26%and 18%vs.11%)Seek health-related advice(16%and 22%vs.8%)Generate new content from a persons voice or image(20%and 17%vs.9%)Black youth are more likely than White youth to use genera-tive AI to:

45、Get help with homework(59%of Black teens vs.47%of White teens)Get advice on a personal issue(25%vs.14%)Help them write code or create an app(17%vs.7%)Latino youth,by comparison,are more likely than White and Black youth to use generative AI to translate something from one language to another(53%vs.3

46、7%and 31%,respectively).Latino youth are also more likely than White youth to use gen AI to write a document or email(41%vs.29%)and to create a new image or video(43%vs.27%).2.Teens say they are using generative AI for a variety of purposes,but using it for help with homework is the most common.Beyo

47、nd which AI platforms teens choose to use,they use gen-erative AI for a variety of tasks and purposes.The most commonly reported activities are using gen AI for homework help(53%),to stave off boredom(42%),and to translate some-thing from one language to another(41%).We asked about 14 different acti

48、vities in this survey that fall into two categories:formal or educational activities,and sepa-rately,personal activities.Formal or educational activities include summarizing or translating content,making images or videos,brainstorming ideas,helping with homework,and writing documents,email,and code.

49、Most of these activities are carried out by about one-third and up to one-half of all teens,with the exception of writing code,which only about 12%of teens have ever engaged in with the assistance of gen AI.In this survey,we also asked about gen AI-supported personal activities such as staving off b

50、oredom and loneliness,creating content as a joke or to tease someone,creating new content using someone elses voice or image,planning activities,and seeking personal or health advice.Fewer youth turn to gen-erative AI for personal activities.Between 12%and 19%engage in these activities with the assi

51、stance of gen AI.The one exception to this trend is using gen AI to relieve boredom,which more than two in five teens report.13 See Pew Research Center.(2023,December 11).Teens,social media,and technology 2023.https:/www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/12/11/teens-social-media-and-technology-2023/THE

52、DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 6 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Teen purpose of generative AI use,by race/ethnicityAmong teens who use gen AI,the percentage who have ever used it to assist them in the following ways.Teens who use gen AI,

53、by race/ethnicityTotalWhite Black Latino Help with homework53%47%a59%b57%abKeep me from being bored42%39%a42%a48%aTranslate something from one language to another41%37%a31%a53%bBrainstorm ideas38%35%a37%a43%aWrite a document or email35%29%a39%ab41%bCreate a new image or video33%27%a32%ab43%bSummariz

54、e or synthesize information33%31%a30%a35%aCreate content as a joke or to tease another person19%15%a24%b24%bGet advice on a personal issue18%14%a25%b22%abPlan an activity16%10%a24%b22%bKeep me company15%11%a26%b18%bSeek health-related advice14%8%a16%b22%bGenerate new content from a persons voice or

55、image12%9%a20%b17%bWrite code or create an app12%7%a17%b12%a Note:Items with different superscripts differ significantly across rows within each category(p .05).Q:Have you ever used generative AI to assist you with any of the follow-ing?The respondents included in this table were 763 young people ag

56、e 1318 who have ever used generative AI.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.7 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.3.Tw

57、o in five(40%)teens report using generative AI for school assignments,with a nearly even split between those who use gen AI with their teachers permission and those who do not.While 70%of teens report using generative AI,a smaller pro-portion of teens use gen AI specifically for schoolwork.Two in fi

58、ve(40%)teens report having ever used gen AI to help with school assignments,while 60%say they have never used gen AI to help with schoolwork.Latino teens were more likely to say that they have used gen AI to help with school assignments compared to their White peers(45%vs.36%).Teens who reported usi

59、ng generative AI to help with school assignments were prompted to think about the most recent time they used gen AI to help with schoolwork and whether using gen AI was with their teachers permission or not.About two in five(41%)teens who used gen AI to help with schoolwork did the most recent assig

60、nment with their teachers permission.Almost the same proportion of teens,46%,used gen AI for the assignment without the teachers permission.About 1 in 10(12%)teens were not sure whether they used gen AI for the assignment with their teachers per-mission or not.14 14 Another possible option is that t

61、eens may not have been given explicit permission or specifically denied permission to use these tools.We attempted to capture this using the not sure option.The sample sizes for certain subgroups were relatively small for this question,and there were no significant differences by age,grade,gender,ra

62、ce/ethnicity,or LGBTQ+identity.Two in five teens use generative AI for schoolwork,with a nearly even split between those using with and without teacher permission Percent of teens who have used gen AI for school assignments,and those who did so with or without teachers permission60%No,I have not use

63、d gen AI to help with schoolwork40%Yes,I have used gen AI to help with schoolwork46%Yes,without my teachers permission41%Yes,with my teachers permission12%Yes,but unsure if with teachers permissionNote:Total amounts may not sum to 100%from the reported subtotals due to rounding and nonresponse.Q:Hav

64、e you ever used generative AI to help with your school assignments?If a teen answered yes,they were given the following question:As a reminder,this survey is entirely confidential.Thinking about the most recent time when you used generative AI to help with a school assignment,was it with your teache

65、rs permission or not?The respondents included in this chart were 452 young people age 1318 who have ever used generative AI to help with school assignments.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.THE DAWN OF THE AI

66、ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 8 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.5.Most parents are in the dark about their childs generative AI use;just 37%of parents whose teen reported using at least one gen AI platform thought their child had already used gen AI.Th

67、ere are significant gaps in parents awareness of their childs use of generative AI.Among parents whose teen indicated using at least one generative AI platform,only 37%thought their child had used gen AI.About one in four(23%)of these parents believe their child had not used any of these plat-forms,

68、while 39%were not sure whether their child had used these tools.Most parents are out of the loop around their teens use of generative AI Percent of parents whose teen has used at least one gen AI platform who indicate awareness of that use39%Not sure37%Yes23%NoNote:Q:To your knowledge,has your 13-to

69、 18-year-old child ever used generative AI?The respondents included in this chart were 763 young people age 1318 who have used at least one generative AI platform and their parents.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their pa

70、rents.Although most parents are aware of gen AI tools87%have heard at least a little about gen AImany have not discussed the topic with their teen.Almost half(49%)say they have not talked about gen AI,while 45%have had discussions about the technology with their child.4.Among teens who have used gen

71、erative AI for school assignments,63%say they have used chatbots or text generators,while a little more than half(57%)have used search engines with AI-generated results.Teens who have used generative AI to help with school assign-ments use various types of systems to support their schoolwork:63%have

72、 used chatbots or text generators.57%have used search engines with AI-generated results.23%have used image generators for their schoolwork.13%have used video generators for school.White teens are more likely to have used chatbots/text generators(68%)compared to Latino teens(53%).Latino teens are mor

73、e likely to have used image genera-tors for schoolwork(30%)than White teens(18%).Black(20%)and Latino teens(18%)are about three times more likely than White teens(6%)to say they have used video generators for school.Chatbots/text generators are the most common platform teens use for schoolwork Perce

74、nt of teens who have used various types of generative AI to help with school assignmentsChatbots/text generators63%Search engines with AI-generated results57%Image generators23%Video generators13%Note:Q:What types of generative AI have you used for school assignments?The respondents included in this

75、 chart were 420 young people age 1318 who have used generative AI to help with school assignments.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.9 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT H

76、OME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.15 Common Sense Media and Impact Research.(2023,May 10).Parents and students are optimistic about AI,but parents have a lot to learn to catch up to their kidsand want rules and ratings to help them.https:/monsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/fea

77、tured-content/files/common-sense-ai-polling-memo-may-10-2023-final.pdf 6.About 6 in 10 teens report either that their school has no rules for how generative AI can be used or that theyre not sure if there are rules.And most parents say that schools have not communicated with families about gen AI po

78、licies.Based on teen reports,many schools and teachers may not have clearly communicated about or implemented rules for generative AI.And many teens still report uncertainty about school policies and teacher permissions.37%of teens are not sure whether their school has gen AI rules.35%say their scho

79、ol does have rules for how gen AI can be used.27%report that their school has no rules.Most teens report that teachers do NOT allow generative AI Percent of teens who indicate that their teachers have discussed use of gen AI in the following waysMostly do not allow students to use gen AI42%Teachers

80、have not mentioned gen AI27%Mostly allow students to use gen AI7%Not sure23%Note:Q:When it comes to generative AI,do your teachers?The respondents included in this chart were 1,045 young people age 1318.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people

81、 age 1318 and their parents.Communication and permission from teachers in regard to generative AI for schoolwork vary significantly.And most parents say their childs school has not communicated with them about generative AI at all.Yet even in cases where there may not be schoolwide rules,students re

82、port that their teach-ers have implemented a range of restrictions:42%of teens say their teachers mostly do not allow stu-dents to use generative AI.In a separate Common Sense 2023 survey,15 a majority of students age 12 to 18(51%)felt that schools should limit the use of gen AI programs,such as Cha

83、tGPT,until safeguards and rules are in place.27%of teens in the current survey say their teachers have not mentioned generative AI,and 23%were not sure whether their teachers allow gen AI use.7%report that their teachers mostly allow students to use generative AI.Notably,Black teens(13%)are more lik

84、ely to say their teachers mostly allow students to use generative AI when compared with White(7%)and Latino teens(7%).The large majority of parents of teens(83%)say that their childs school has not communicated with them about genera-tive AI,compared with 16%of parents who report that the school has

85、 communicated.Just 10%say schools have com-municated with them specifically about how AI will be used in the classroom,and 4%say the school has communicated about a generative AI ban.THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 10 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL R

86、IGHTS RESERVED.7.Black teens are about twice as likely as their peers to report that teachers flagged their schoolwork as being created by generative AI when it was not.Among teens who reported that teachers had talked to their class about allowing or restricting the use of generative AI,29%say that

87、 at least one teacher had used software to detect the use of generative AI in students writing.Although these tools are not always accurate in their attempts to identify AI-generated content,some teachers rely on them.Among all teens,10%say that at least one teacher had flagged their work as generat

88、ed by AI when it was not.About 70%of young people who had their work flagged by a teacher have also had their work submitted to an AI detection software,while 27%of them say their work had not been submitted.However,Black teens are more than twice as likely as White or Latino teens to say that teach

89、ers flagged their schoolwork as being created by generative AI when it was not(20%vs.7%and 10%,respectively).This suggests that software to detect AI,as well as teachers use of it,may be exacerbating existing discipline disparities among historically marginalized groups,16 particularly Black student

90、s.17 In the United States,Black stu-dents face the highest rate of disciplinary measures in both public and private schoolsdespite being no more likely to misbehave18which contributes to negative impacts,such as lower academic performance.19 Black teens are most likely to have schoolwork incorrectly

91、 flagged as created by generative AI Percent of teens whose teacher(s)flagged their schoolwork as being created by gen AI when it was not,by race/ethnicityBlack Latino WhiteYes20%*10%7%No68%66%79%*Not sure13%13%23%*Note:Total amounts may not sum to 100%from the reported subtotals due to rounding and

92、 nonresponse.Bars with an asterisk differ significantly from the other bars within each response option(p .05).Q:Thinking about the following,have any of your teachers?The respondents included in this chart were 771 young people age 1318 whose teachers mostly do or do not allow students to use gener

93、ative AI.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.16 Woelfel,K.(2023,December 18).Brief Late applications:Disproportionate effects of generative AI-detectors on English learners.Center for Democracy&Technology.https:

94、/cdt.org/insights/brief-late-applications-disproportionate-effects-of-generative-ai-detectors-on-english-learners/17 Peterson,E.(2021).Racial inequality in public school discipline for Black students in the United States.Ballard Center.https:/ballardbrief.byu.edu/issue-briefs/racial-inequality-in-pu

95、blic-school-discipline-for-black-students-in-the-united-states18 Institute of Education Sciences.(2019,February).Indicator 15:Retention,suspension,and expulsion.National Center for Education Statistics.https:/nces.ed.gov/programs/raceindicators/indicator_rda.asp19 Morris,E.W.,&Perry,B.L.(2016).The p

96、unishment gap:School suspension and racial disparities in achievement.Social Problems,63(1),6886.https:/doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv02611 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.8.About half of teens(49%)say they

97、have checked other sources to verify the accuracy of generative AI outputs used for school assignments,and 39%of teens who have used AI for school have detected problems and inaccuracies in gen AI outputs.One major challenge facing teachers and parents is how to guide students to assess the accuracy

98、 of content dispensed from chatbots and other AI tools.Young learners may not know enough about a topic to recognize when the information they receive from a generative AI tool is biased or inaccurate.Teens in our survey express their own concerns about inaccu-rate content,with two-thirds(66%)of tee

99、ns agreeing that gen AI could give inaccurate content to students.Large shares of parents(71%)agree that students receiving inaccurate results is a concern when considering the use of gen AI in schools.White youth are more likely than Latino and Black youth to report concerns about inaccuracies;72%o

100、f White teens agree that generative AI could give inaccurate content to students versus 61%of Latino youth and 47%of Black youth.39%of teens who have used gen AI for schoolwork say they have noticed a problem or inaccuracy with a genera-tive AI output.Another 25%are not sure.Among teens who have use

101、d generative AI for school assign-ments,about half have consulted other sources:Almost half(49%)have checked other sources to verify the accuracy of generative AI outputs created for school assignments,while 43%have not checked other sources.20 Older teens(age 15 to 18)have a higher likelihood of ch

102、ecking other sources to verify the accuracy of genera-tive AI outputs created for school assignments(55%)when compared with teens age 13 to 14(35%).Discussions and lessons in school can help scaffold young people on how to interact with these technologies,encourag-ing teens to cautiously and skeptic

103、ally read outputs and verify the information.Teens who had class activities focused on generative AI are more likely to report having checked other sources to verify the accuracy of their gen AI outputs than teens who have not had class discussions(55%vs.43%).Older teens are more likely than younger

104、 teens to verify accuracy of generative AI outputs for schoolwork Percent of teens who have used gen AI for school assignments and who indicate whether they have checked other sources to verify gen AI outputsYesNoNot sureTeens age 1314 Teens age 151835%55%*51%*38%14%*6%Note:*Differences between teen

105、s age 1314 and teens age 1518 are statistically significant at the level of p .05.Q:Do you ever check other sources to verify the accuracy of your generative AI outputs created for school assignments?The respondents included in this chart were 452 young people age 1318 who have used generative AI to

106、 help with school assignments.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.20 In some cases,there may be little or no need to assess the accuracy of outputs,such as with prompts that might generate creative illustrations

107、 for a report or presentation.THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 12 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Furthermore,parents of White and Latino teens are more likely to agree that students might not learn critical skills because generative AI

108、 does it for them(80%for parents of White teens and 75%for parents of Latino teens vs.60%for parents of Black teens),and that gen AI could give inaccurate content to students(77%and 71%vs.54%).Parents of Black and White youth diverge around their view of the risks of generative AI in schools Percent

109、 of parents who somewhat to strongly agree with the following statements about the impact of gen AI in schools,by race/ethnicityGen AI could give inaccurate content to studentsParents of Black Youth Parents of Latino Youth Parents of White YouthGen AI could be used to cheat in school 65%a74%a82%bGen

110、 AI could give biased or hateful content to students43%a53%ab59%bStudents might not learn critical skills because gen AI does it for them60%a75%b80%b54%a71%b77%bNote:Bars with different superscripts differ significantly within each category (p .05).Q:Here are some things some people say about genera

111、tive AI in schools.Please tell us if you agree or disagree with each statement.The respondents included in this chart were 1,045 parents of young people age 1318.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.9.Parents of

112、Black teens are more optimistic about the impact of generative AI on learning,skill acquisition,and inequality in education.Overall,Black teens are more likely to report teacher involve-ment in generative AI compared to their White and Latino peers.Black teens are more likely than White and Latino s

113、tu-dents to report that their teachers used generative AI to brainstorm ideas in class(30%vs.19%and 19%,respectively),and that their teachers asked them to use generative AI for help with writing,editing,or organizing thoughts(27%vs.11%and 13%).In addition,Black teens more often report that their sc

114、hool has no rules about how gen AI can be used when com-pared with Latino teens(34%vs.22%).Perhaps due to greater teacher engagement,Black teens,in particular,less often point to the risks surrounding generative AI in schools.White and Latino youth,compared to Black youth,are significantly more like

115、ly to express concerns that gen AI could be used to cheat in school(81%for White youth and 77%for Latino youth vs.60%for Black youth).The same pattern emerges with youth concerns about the use of gen AI to create bullying content(62%for White youth and 67%for Latino youth vs.49%of Black youth).Compa

116、red to Black youth,White youth are also more likely to agree that students might not learn critical skills because generative AI does it for them(68%for White youth vs.54%of Black youth).Similar to teens,differences in concerns by race/ethnicity emerge among parents.Parents of Black teens are more o

117、pti-mistic about the possibility of gen AI use to reduce educational disparities;compared with the parents of White teens,parents of Black teens are nearly twice as likely to believe that the use of gen AI in schools will decrease inequality in educa-tion(22%vs.13%).Parents of Black teens are also a

118、lmost twice as likely to indi-cate that these platforms will have a positive impact on their teens learning in school compared to parents of White teens(37%vs.21%).Parents of White teens more often report that generative AI will have a negative impact on their teens learn-ing in school versus parent

119、s of Black teens(34%vs.23%).Parents of White teens,compared to parents of Black teens,are also more likely to agree that generative AI could give biased or hateful content to students(59%for parents of White youth vs.43%for parents of Black youth),and are also more likely than parents of Black and L

120、atino teens to say gen AI could be used to cheat in school(82%vs.65%and 74%).13 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Parents of Black and Latino youth are more optimistic about generative AIs impact on their

121、childs skills Percent of parents who think their childs use of gen AI will mostly improve their childs skills,by race/ethnicityAbility to Generate New IdeasParents of Black Youth Parents of Latino YouthParents of White YouthResearch Skills43%a47%a30%b29%aWriting Skills21%a13%b29%aCritical Thinking S

122、kills24%a20%a12%b42%a32%ab32%ab26%bNote:Bars with different superscripts differ significantly within each category (p .05).Q:Do you think your childs use of generative AI will mostly improve,harm or not change the following?The respondents included in this chart were 1,045 parents of young people ag

123、e 1318.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.Similar patterns are in place when we look at specific types of skills that might be displaced by generative AI.When com-pared with parents of Black youth,parents of Wh

124、ite and Latino youth are more likely to voice concerns about the impact of gen AI on their teens skills.Parents of White and Latino youth more often report that their childs use of gen AI will mostly harm a wide range of skills:57%of parents of White youth and 51%of parents of Latino youth say gen A

125、I will mostly harm their childs writing skills,compared with 28%of parents of Black youth.61%of parents of White youth and 57%of parents of Latino youth say gen AI will mostly harm their childs crit-ical thinking skills,relative to 35%of parents of Black youth.51%of parents of White youth and 47%of

126、parents of Latino youth say gen AI will mostly harm their childs ability to generate new ideas,while 30%of parents of Black youth agree this is a concern.At the same time,parents of Latino and Black youth,com-pared with parents of White youth,are significantly more likely to see the potential for ge

127、nerative AI to enhance their childs skills.Parents of Black and Latino teens are about twice as likely as parents of White teens to say their childs use of gen AI will mostly improve their critical thinking skills(24%and 20%vs.12%)and are significantly more likely to say gen AI will improve their ch

128、ilds research skills(43%and 47%vs.30%)and writing skills(29%and 21%vs.13%).THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 14 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.As they look toward the future,teens who have had class dis-cussions or lessons about generat

129、ive AI are also significantly more likely than those who did not to say that the introduction of gen AI has changed how they think about their anticipated plans,including the sorts of skills they intend to develop(28%vs.17%),their educational path(21%vs.15%),and the type of job they would like to pu

130、rsue(25%vs.16%).10.Teens whove had class discussions about generative AI are more likely to have nuanced views about its usefulness and challenges,and more often say it has changed the skills,educational path,or job they plan to pursue.Talking about generative AI in the classroom may contribute to a

131、 more nuanced understanding of perceived benefits,chal-lenges,and uses of generative AI among teens.Teens who had discussions in class about generative AI are more likely to point to a number of benefits that generative AI may offer for learning and education.Compared to those who have not had class

132、 discussions or lessons,they are more likely to agree that gen AI tools and features could help students brainstorm ideas for school projects(84%who have had class discussions on gen AI vs.65%for those who have not);could help personalize learning for students(71%vs.55%);and that learning how to use

133、 gen AI could give students an advantage in their future jobs(76%vs.56%).Teens who have had class discussions are also more aware of certain limitations with generative AI.For instance,those who had class discussions are more likely to agree that gen AI could be used to cheat in school(87%vs.73%)and

134、 that students might share personal information with generative AI(76%vs.62%).Teens who had class discussions or lessons about gen AI are also more likely than teens who have not had class discus-sions to report having checked other sources to verify the accuracy of their generative AI outputs(55%vs

135、.43%).Class discussions and lessons about generative AI are also connected to a more optimistic outlook among teens about the impact of gen AI on learning.Slightly over half of teens who report that they have had class discussions or lessons about generative AI say these systems will have a positive

136、 effect on their learning at school(56%),compared with 37%who did not have discussions or lessons but felt positive about the impact of AI on in-school learning.And not only does talking about generative AI in class shape understanding about the technologys impact on learning,but such discussions al

137、so suggest the importance of learning to use gen AI for future jobs.Seven in 10 teens who had class discus-sions and lessons about generative AI say that learning gen AI-related skills is necessary for K12 students future careers,compared to half of those who did not have class discussions.15 THE DA

138、WN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Teens who have had class discussions or lessons on generative AI are more likely to have a more balanced view of gen AI in learning and education,and see potential to shape lear

139、ning and future plans Percent of teens who somewhat to strongly agree with the following statements,by whether they had class discussions or lessons on gen AIClass Discussions or Lessons No Class Discussions or LessonsGen AI will have a positive effect on my learning at school56%37%Gen AI tools and

140、features could help students brainstorm ideas for school projects84%65%Gen AI could help personalize learning for students71%55%Learning how to use gen AI could give students an advantage in their future jobs76%56%Gen AI could be used to cheat in school 87%73%Students might share personal info with

141、gen AI76%62%Necessary*for K12 students to learn gen AI-related skills for their future careers70%50%Changed the type of skills I plan to develop28%17%Changed the educational path I plan to pursue21%15%Changed the type of job I plan to pursue25%16%Note:The chart represents data from four questions,li

142、sted in order from the top of the chart to the bottom.*All data in the chart pertains to response options that include somewhat to strongly agree,with the exception of Q3,where data in the chart represents responses that include somewhat to very necessary.Q1:What kind of impact do you think AI platf

143、orms like generative AI will have on your learning?Q2:Here are some things some people say about generative AI in schools.Please tell us if you agree or disagree with each statement.Q3:How necessary do you think it is for K12 students to learn generative AI-related skills for their future careers?Q4

144、:Has the introduction of generative AI changed the way you think about your future plans in the following ways?Differences between those who have and have not had class discussions or lessons about gen AI are statistically significant for all items at the level of p .05.The respondents included in t

145、his chart were 1,045 young people age 1318.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 16 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

146、11.Black and Latino youth are significantly more likely to say generative AI will have a positive impact on their learning in school,and that the introduction of gen AI has changed how they think about their future.Two in five teens(44%)say generative AI will have a positive impact on their learning

147、 in school,versus 25%who report these platforms will have a negative effect.Black and Latino youth are significantly more likely than White youth to believe that AI tools like generative AI will have a positive impact on their learning in school(55%and 50%vs.38%,respectively).Hands-on experience wit

148、h gen AI makes a difference in young peoples sense of its impact.Almost twice as many youth who have used gen AI for schoolwork,versus those who have not,say these systems will have a positive impact on their learning in school(62%vs.32%).When thinking about their future,relatively small numbers of

149、teens say the introduction of generative AI has shaped their thinking about their future trajectory.About one in five(21%)report that it has changed the skills they want to cultivate,17%of teens say that the advent of gen AI has changed their planned educational path,and another one in five(19%)repo

150、rt shifts in their future job plans.Black and Latino youth,compared to their White peers,are more likely to say that the introduction of generative AI has changed how they think about their future,from the skills they want to develop(26%of Black youth and 25%of Latino youth vs.16%of White youth),to

151、their educational path(23%and 21%vs.13%),and the job they plan to pursue(26%and 23%vs.14%).17 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Seven in 10 teens age 13 to 18 say they have used at least one type of genera

152、tive AI tool.Search and chatbots are considerably more popular than image-and video-generating tools for both teens and parents.The range of generative AI tools accessible to youth grows each day,but the dominant platforms tend to fall into one of four categories:Chatbots/text generators,such as Cha

153、tGPT,Google Gemini,or Snaps My AI Image generators,such as DALL-E,Bing Image Creator,or Photoshop with gen AI features Video generators such as Midjourney,Stable Diffusion,or Google VideoPoet Search engines with AI-generated results such as Bing,Google SGE,or Brave SummarizerOverall,70%of young peop

154、le age 13 to 18 have used at least one of these types of generative AI tools.21 Unlike other online tools,teens of all ages,genders,and racial and ethnic backgrounds are equally likely to have used genera-tive AI overall.However,teens who have a parent with a college degree are considerably more lik

155、ely to have used at least one type of gen AI tool;74%of such youth have used gen AI,compared with 66%of those with a parent who is not a college graduate.Teens most often use AI-supported search Percent of teens who use the following types of generative AI toolsVideo generatorsImage generators Chatb

156、ots Search engines20%16%20%11%13%27%6%7%21%10%5%7%Daily Several Times Per Week A Few Times Per Month or Less56%51%34%22%NETNote:Total amounts may not sum to 100%from the reported subtotals due to rounding and nonresponse.Q:How often,if ever,have you used the following kinds of generative AI systems?

157、The respondents included in this chart were 1,045 young people age 1318.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.AI-supported searchSearching for information online is a critical and near-daily use of the internet fo

158、r most people,including teens.As AI-augmented and synthesized search tools become more common across different engines,they have become the most widely used generative AI tool for teens.And since this survey was fielded,Google began displaying AI-generated overviews as part of search results on thei

159、r main platform,which pres-ents all users with gen AI results by default.This change was met with criticism about inaccuracies,bias,lack of citation of source material,and suppression of the real authors source content in search results.Similar AI-generated search results by default have been integr

160、ated into other major platforms,like Facebook and Instagram.Part 1:How Teens and Parents Use Generative AI Tools21 In a 2023 NORC survey for Hopelab and Common Sense Media conducted Oct.4Nov.14,2023,with 1,274 young people age 14 to 22 nationwide,51%of respondents said they had used generative AI at

161、 some point.The question wording and ordering was somewhat different,asking How often do you use generative artificial intelligence(AI)tools,such as ChatGPT?(This was asked of all survey respondents.)Full report available here:https:/monsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/research/report/teen-and-you

162、ng-adult-perspectives-on-generative-ai.pdfTHE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 18 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.More than half of teens(56%)have used search engines with AI-generated results such as Bing,Google SGE,or Brave Summarizer,wit

163、h 20%saying they use gen AI search at least once per day,16%several times per week,and 20%a few times per month or less.Around 4 in 10(43%)say they have never used these tools.In general,there are no notable demo-graphic differences across different groups of teens with regard to the use of gen AI s

164、earch tools.Chatbots or text generatorsWhile chatbots like ChatGPT may have the highest name rec-ognition of the different types of AI tools,they are used slightly less than AI-enhanced search.Overall,51%of teens say they have used chatbots/text generators,such as ChatGPT,Gemini,or Snaps My AI,with

165、11%reporting that they use them at least once a day,13%several times per week,and 27%a few times a month or less.Just less than half of teens(48%)say they have never used chatbots or text generators.Young people with a parent who has a college degree are more likely to have used chatbots and text ge

166、nerators when com-pared with those whose parent does not have a degree(57%vs.45%).And while youth of all races and ethnicities are equally likely to use chatbots and text generators,larger shares of Latino and Black teens report daily use;18%of Black teens and 16%of Latino teens use chatbots and tex

167、t genera-tors at least once per day compared with 8%of White teens.Image generatorsAI image generators allow users to create still images using text prompts(and in some cases,image prompts).The use of these image generators,such as DALL-E,Photoshop with gen AI features,or Bing Image Creator,is less

168、prevalent among teens;34%have used these tools,including 6%who use them at least once per day,7%several times a week,and 21%a few times per month or less.About two in three(65%)teens have never used gen AI image generators.Boys are more likely to have used gen AI image generators when compared with

169、girls(38%vs.30%),and Black and Latino youth are more likely than White youth to have used these tools(39%and 40%vs.30%).Video generatorsThe gen AI tools used the least frequently among teens are video generators,such as Midjourney,Stable Diffusion,or Google VideoPoetrapidly evolving tools that allow

170、 users to create videos from image or text prompts.In total,22%of teens say they have ever used video generators,with 6%saying they use these tools at least daily,5%several times per week,and 10%reporting that they use them a few times per month or less.About three in four(77%)teens say they have ne

171、ver used gen AI video tools.Black(32%)and Latino(31%)teens are nearly twice as likely to use video generators as White teens(16%).Greater percentages of teens use different types of generative AI than parents Percent of teens and parents who have used the following types of gen AI toolsVideo generat

172、orsImage generatorsChatbots/text generatorsAI-supported searchTeens Parents56%55%51%*38%34%*26%22%*15%Note:*Differences between teens and parents are statistically significant at the level of p .05.Q:How often,if ever,have you used the following kinds of generative AI systems?The chart reflects the

173、responses a few times a month or less to several times a day.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.Teens have explored a wider array of generative AI tools when compared with their parents.While teens and their pa

174、rents are equally likely to use search engines with AI-generated results(56%of teens and 55%of parents),teens are signifi-cantly more likely to have used:Chatbots/text generators(51%teens vs.38%parents)Image generators(34%vs.26%)Video generators(22%vs.15%)19 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND

175、THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Most parents are out of the loop around their teens use of generative AI Percent of parents whose teen has used at least one gen AI platform who indicate awareness of that use39%Not sure37%Yes23%NoNote:Q:To your

176、knowledge,has your 13-to 18-year-old child ever used generative AI?The respondents included in this chart were 763 young people age 1318 who have used at least one generative AI platform and their parents.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young peop

177、le age 1318 and their parents.Even though parents are generally aware of generative AI tools87%have heard at least a little about gen AImany have not discussed the topic with their teen.Almost half(49%)say they have not talked about gen AI with their child,while 45%have had discussions about the tec

178、hnology.Parents with higher levels of education are notably more likely to have dis-cussed the topic of generative AI with their teens;52%of those with a college degree have done so,compared with 37%of parents who have not graduated college.Most parents are in the dark about their childs generative

179、AI use;just 37%of parents whose teen reported using at least one gen AI platform thought their child had already used gen AI.We know from decades of research that media use by children and teens has an impact on their development,cognitively and socially.And as generative AI quickly and virally ente

180、rs kids livesboth in and out of schoolparents are often the first line of mediation for that use.Among all parents,28%say that,to their knowledge,their child has used generative AI.Another 31%believe their child has not used gen AI,and 40%say they are not sure.Parents of boys are more likely to say

181、their child has used these tools when compared with parents of girls(33%vs.24%).And parents of teens age 15 to 18 more often report that their child has used some type of generative AI compared with parents of teens age 13 to 14(31%vs.23%).Overall,gaps in parents awareness of their childs gen AI use

182、 are quite significant;just 37%of parents whose teen reported using at least one generative AI platform in our survey thought their child had used gen AI.About one in four(23%)of these parents believed their child had not used any of these plat-forms,and 39%said they were not sure whether their chil

183、d had used gen AI tools.THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 20 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Looking at differences by age,several functions of more formal,school-related generative AI become more common as teens get older.Using gen AI t

184、ools to help brainstorm ideas is considerably more common among youth age 15 to 18 when compared with those age 13 to 14(44%vs.27%).Older teens are also more likely to use gen AI to write a document or email(39%vs.27%)and summarize or synthesize information(37%vs.26%).Typically,with new and emerging

185、 technologies,the early adopters tend to be those in higher-earning households.In this case,that only applies to one gen AI activity:writing a docu-ment or email.Youth living in households earning at least$75,000 are more likely than those in families earning less to have used generative AI tools to

186、 assist them with writing a document or email(38%vs.29%).In contrast,a larger share of teens in families earning less than$75,000 per year have used gen AI to create a new image or video(38%vs.29%).Less formal,more personal generative AI usesIn this category of AI activities,the largest group of tee

187、ns(42%)say they have used gen AI to simply keep them from being bored.Other activities in this category are less common among teens;about one in five teens(19%)report using gen AI for less serious endeavors,noting they have used it to create content as a joke or to tease another person.Another group

188、 of teens say they have used AI to assist them when they needed to get advice,either on a personal issue(18%)or on a health-related topic(14%).Some teens also look for companionship when interacting with generative AI tools;15%note that they have used gen AI to keep them company and others use it to

189、 plan an activity(16%).Teens from families earning less than$75,000 per year are more likely to have used gen AI to assist with personal tasks,such as when they want to plan an activity(20%vs.11%)or have these tools keep them company(18%vs.11%).How and Why Teens Use Generative AIMore than two in fiv

190、e teens say they use gen AI for schoolwork,language translation,and addressing boredom.Teens report many different uses of generative AI tools,ranging from practical and problem-solving to creative and comforting.We asked about 14 different activities in this survey that fall roughly into two catego

191、ries:1)formal or edu-cational activities and 2)personal activities.Formal or educational activities focus on using generative AI to summa-rize or translate content,make images or videos,brainstorm ideas,help with homework,and write documents,email,or code.Personal activities include using gen AI to

192、beat boredom,keep oneself company,get advice on personal or health issues,create content as a joke or to tease someone,and create content using a persons image or voice.Many more young people engage in education-related activi-ties,with between one-third and up to one-half of all teens turning to ge

193、n AI for these more formal tasks,not including writing code or creating an app(12%).Fewer young people engage in the more personal activities,with between 12%and 19%reporting these activities,with the exception of the 42%of teens who say they use gen AI to fight boredom.Education-related and formal

194、uses of generative AIMore than any other activity,teens report that they have turned to gen AI to get help with homework;53%say they have used generative AI tools to assist them in this way.About 4 in 10(41%)say they have used it to translate something from one language to another.In keeping with ot

195、her recent research22 on young peoples use of gen AI,this survey finds that brainstorming ideas continues to be one of the more popular functions(38%of teens).Similarly,just over one-third(35%)say they have used genera-tive AI tools to help them write a document or email.One in three(33%)also say th

196、ey have used gen AI to create a new image or video,and the same share say they have used it to summarize or synthesize information(33%).22 See Common Sense Media.(2024,June 3).Teen and young adult perspectives on generative AI:Patterns of use,excitements,and concerns.https:/monsensemedia.org/researc

197、h/teen-and-young-adult-perspectives-on-generative-ai-patterns-of-use-excitements-and-concerns21 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Just over 1 in 10(12%)teens have generated new digital content using a pers

198、ons voice or image.Among the more novel uses of generative AI,12%of teens say they have generated new content from a persons voice or image.The same share(12%)say they have used it to write code or create an app.Notably,there are a few gender differences in the use of gen-erative AI tools.23 Girls a

199、re more likely than boys to have used gen AI to keep them company(17%vs.11%),while boys are more likely than girls to have used the tools to help them write code or create an app(16%vs.9%).23 The number of youth who report a different gender identity other than boy/man or girl/woman and use generati

200、ve AI(n=15)was too small to report findings for this group.Similarly,the number of LGBTQ+youth who use generative AI(n=64)was below a reasonable threshold for reporting findings when compared with non-LGBTQ+youth.Teen purpose of generative AI use,by gender and ageNote:Items with different superscrip

201、ts differ significantly across rows within each category(p .05).Q:Have you ever used generative AI to assist you with any of the following?The respondents included in this table were 763 young people age 1318 who have ever used generative AI.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March

202、15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.Among teens who use gen AI,the percentage who have ever used it to assist them in the following ways.Teens who use gen AITotalGirlsBoys13 to 1415 to 18Help with homework53%55%a50%a49%a55%aKeep me from being bored42%38%a45%a44%a41%aTr

203、anslate something from one language to another41%39%a41%a43%a40%aBrainstorm ideas38%33%a41%a27%a44%bWrite a document or email35%36%a34%a27%a39%bCreate a new image or video33%29%a37%a34%a32%aSummarize or synthesize information33%30%a34%a26%a37%bCreate content as a joke or to tease another person19%16

204、%a23%a18%a20%aGet advice on a personal issue18%18%a17%a18%a18%aPlan an activity16%19%a13%a15%a17%aKeep me company15%17%a11%b18%a13%aSeek health-related advice14%16%a13%a11%a16%aGenerate new content from a persons voice or image12%12%a12%a12%a12%aWrite code or create an app12%9%a16%b9%a14%aTHE DAWN O

205、F THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 22 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.In addition,larger shares of both Black and Latino youth say they have used generative AI tools to create content as a joke or to tease another person when compared with White yo

206、uth(24%and 24%vs.15%).And Black and Latino youth are more likely than White youth to say they have used gen AI tools to help them plan an activity(24%and 22%vs.10%),keep them company(26%and 18%vs.11%),seek health-related advice(16%and 22%vs.8%),and generate new content from a per-sons voice or image

207、(20%and 17%vs.9%).Black and Latino youth report a much wider range of generative AI use.The relationship that Black and Latino youth have with gen AI tools is markedly different when compared with White youth.24 For instance,Black youth are more likely than White youth to report using gen AI for hel

208、p with homework(59%vs.47%)and to get advice on a personal issue when compared with White youth(25%vs.14%).They also more often report using the technology to help them write code or create an app(17%vs.7%).Latino youth,by comparison,are more likely than White and Black youth to use gen AI to transla

209、te something from one language to another(53%vs.37%and 31%).Latino youth are also more likely than White youth to use gen AI to write a document or email(41%vs.29%)and to create a new image or video(43%vs.27%).Teen purpose of generative AI use,by race/ethnicityAmong teens who use gen AI,the percenta

210、ge who have ever used it to assist them in the following ways.Teens who use gen AI,by race/ethnicityTotalWhite Black Latino Help with homework53%47%a59%b57%abKeep me from being bored42%39%a42%a48%aTranslate something from one language to another41%37%a31%a53%bBrainstorm ideas38%35%a37%a43%aWrite a d

211、ocument or email35%29%a39%ab41%bCreate a new image or video33%27%a32%ab43%bSummarize or synthesize information33%31%a30%a35%aCreate content as a joke or to tease another person19%15%a24%b24%bGet advice on a personal issue18%14%a25%b22%abPlan an activity16%10%a24%b22%bKeep me company15%11%a26%b18%bSe

212、ek health-related advice14%8%a16%b22%bGenerate new content from a persons voice or image12%9%a20%b17%bWrite code or create an app12%7%a17%b12%a Note:Items with different superscripts differ significantly across rows within each category(p .05).Q:Have you ever used generative AI to assist you with an

213、y of the follow-ing?The respondents included in this table were 763 young people age 1318 who have ever used generative AI.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.24 These overall trends are similar to recent data g

214、athered from a different survey for Common Sense Media in November 2023.See Common Sense Media.(2024,June 3).Teen and young adult perspectives on generative AI:Patterns of use,excitements,and concerns.https:/monsensemedia.org/research/teen-and-young-adult-perspectives-on-generative-ai-patterns-of-us

215、e-excitements-and-concerns23 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Parents experience with generative AI tools for specific tasks is less varied than their teens,but their patterns of use are quite similar.Par

216、ents who say they have used gen AI were asked a similar battery of questions to teens about how they use gen AI and for what purpose.The range of activities they are likely to engage in is somewhat more limited when compared with their teens,but many of the ways that parents use generative AI tools

217、are remarkably similar to their children.The only activity that parents are more likely to use gen AI to assist them with is seeking health-related advice;20%of parents have done this,compared with 14%of teens who are generative AI users.In comparison,teens are more likely than their parents to use

218、gen AI to brainstorm ideas(38%vs.27%),create a new image or video(33%vs.24%),use generative AI tools to keep them company(15%vs.7%),and create content as a joke or to tease another person(19%vs.10%).Teen and parent purpose of generative AI useAmong teens and parents who use gen AI,the percentage who

219、 have ever used it to assist them in the following ways.Users of gen AITotal TeensTotal ParentsHelp with homework53%n/aLearn a new skilln/a22%Keep me from being bored42%n/aTranslate something from one language to another41%a39%aBrainstorm ideas38%a27%bWrite a document or email35%a37%bCreate a new im

220、age or video33%a24%bSummarize or synthesize information33%a30%aCreate content as a joke or to tease another person19%a10%bGet advice on a personal issue18%a17%aPlan an activity16%a19%aKeep me company15%a7%bSeek health-related advice14%a20%bGenerate new content from a persons voice or image12%a11%aWr

221、ite code or create an app12%a12%aNote:Items with different superscripts differ significantly between rows within each category(p .05).Q for teens and parents:Have you ever used generative AI to assist you with any of the following?The respondents included in this table were 763 young people age 1318

222、 and 693 of their parents who have ever used generative AI.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 24 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL

223、RIGHTS RESERVED.Somewhat similar to trends among teens,parents of Black and Latino teens are more likely than parents of White teens to use generative AI tools to assist them with specific activities.For instance,parents of Black(23%)and Latino teens(18%)are about four times as likely as parents of

224、White teens(5%)to generate new content from a persons voice or image,and nearly twice as likely to say that they use these platforms to seek health-related advice(29%for parents of Black teens and 28%for parents of Latino teens vs.15%for parents of White teens).In addition,echoing patterns observed

225、among teens,parents of Latino youth are more likely than parents of Black and White teens to use generative AI to translate something from one language to another(51%vs.34%and 32%).However,unlike teens,there are additional differences between parents of Black and Latino teens in gen AI usage.Parents

226、 of Black teens(40%)are about twice as likely as parents of Latino teens(21%)and nearly three times as likely as those of White teens(15%)to report they have used gen-erative AI to plan an activity.They are also significantly more likely to say they have used these tools to learn a new skill(36%vs.2

227、7%and 19%).Similarly,close to 4 in 10 parents of Black teens(37%)use generative AI to brainstorm ideas,com-pared with about 2 in 10 parents of Latino teens(21%).Parent purpose of generative AI use,by child race/ethnicity,parent education,and household incomeAmong parents who use gen AI,the percentag

228、e who have ever used it to assist them in the following ways.Parents by Child Race/Ethnicity,Parent Education,and HH IncomeTotal ParentsWhite Black Latino College GradCollege Grad+$75K$75K+Translate something from one language to another39%32%a34%a51%b36%a41%a42%a37%aWrite a document or email37%33%a

229、36%a44%a31%a45%b25%a41%bSummarize or synthesize information30%32%a30%ab20%b23%a39%b26%a31%aBrainstorm ideas27%28%ab37%a21%b21%a33%b22%a28%aCreate a new image or video24%24%a28%a21%a21%a25%a26%a21%aLearn a new skill22%19%a36%b27%a20%a20%a24%a19%aSeek health-related advice20%15%a29%b28%b21%a15%a25%a16

230、%bPlan an activity19%15%a40%b21%a17%a19%a20%a17%aGet advice on a personal issue17%13%a26%b20%ab16%a15%a21%a13%bWrite code or create an app12%7%a14%a13%a10%a13%a10%a12%aGenerate new content from a persons voice or image11%5%a23%b18%b11%a7%a12%a8%aCreate content as a joke or to tease another person10%

231、10%a17%a8%a8%a11%a11%a9%aKeep me company7%4%a20%b10%c5%a7%a9%a4%bNote:Items with different superscripts differ significantly across rows within each category(p .05).Q:Have you ever used generative AI to assist you with any of the following?The respondents included in this table were 763 young people

232、 age 1318 and 693 of their parents who have ever used generative AI.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.25 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE M

233、EDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Generative AI platforms have quickly become widely acces-sible and multifunctional tools for education.They can accompany teens both in the classroom and when doing homework,and can assist teachers during instruction and lesson preparation.25 Generative AI has the potential

234、to constructively scaffold learning by adapting to students diverse needs and chal-lenges.26 While generative AI holds promise for improving student learning and supporting educators,there are con-cerns that advances in the technology are outpacing the development of school regulations and guidance

235、for students and teachers,27 leaving teens and families confused about permitted and appropriate uses,and exposing students to disciplinary action.28 AI use in classrooms raises existential questions about the foundations of learning:Is it OK to lean on artificial intelli-gence to generate new ideas

236、 or synthesize the main takeaways from a book?What are the tradeoffs for learning when we cede these functions to large language models instead of exer-cising our own mental muscles?Going forward,it will remain critically important to under-stand which gen AI tools teens currently use for school,as

237、well as whether they check the veracity of content created by generative AI and how they navigate school regulations,if any have been implemented.Likewise,understanding teens per-spectives on teachers lessons and discussions about generative AI within the classroom is crucial to understanding how te

238、ens perceive teachers management and implementa-tion of gen AI at school.Furthermore,understanding parents perceptions about the use of gen AI in their childs school can help bridge the com-munication gaps between children,parents,and schools.Two in five teens report having ever used generative AI t

239、o help with school assignments.While a majority of teens have used generative AI,a smaller proportion of teens use these tools for school.Among teens,two in five(40%)report having ever used gen AI to help with school assignments,while three in five(60%)say they have never used gen AI to help with sc

240、hool assignments.Although there were no differences in school-related genera-tive AI use by age,gender,or parent education,in terms of race/ethnicity,Latino teens are more likely to say that they have used gen AI to help with school assignments compared to their White peers(45%vs.36%).Having a paren

241、t who is familiar with generative AI also means a teen is more likely to use gen AI for schoolwork than teens with a parent who is less familiar with AI(47%vs.28%).Among teens who say they have used generative AI to help with schoolwork,more than 6 in 10 have used chatbots or text generators for tha

242、t schoolwork,while a little more than half have used search engines with AI-generated text.Teens who have used generative AI to help with their school assignments have used a range of types of gen AI for their work.More specifically,the majority(63%)have used chatbots or text generators(e.g.,ChatGPT

243、,Google Gemini,or Snaps My AI)and search engines with AI-generated results(57%),such as Bing,Google SGE,or Brave Summarizer.Around 2 in 10(23%)have used image generators(e.g.,DALL-E,Photoshop with gen AI features,or Bing Image Creator)for schoolwork,and about 1 in 10(13%)used video generators(e.g.,M

244、idjourney,Stable Diffusion,or Google VideoPoet).Part 2:How Teens Use and Experience AI in School and for School25 Bryant,J.,Heitz,C.,Sanghvi,S.,&Wagle,D.(2020,January 14).How artificial intelligence will impact K12 teachers.McKinsey&Company.https:/ Office of Educational Technology.(2023,May).Artific

245、ial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning:Insights and recommendations.U.S.Department of Education.https:/www2.ed.gov/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf27 Miao,F.,&Holmes,W.(2023).Guidance for generative AI in education and research.UNESCO Publishing.https:/doi.org/10.54675/EWZM953528

246、Dwyer,M.,&Laird,E.(2024,March).Up in the air:Educators juggling the potential of generative AI with detection,discipline,and distrust.Center for Democracy&Technology.https:/cdt.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2024-03-21-CDT-Civic-Tech-Generative-AI-Survey-Research-final.pdf THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEE

247、NS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 26 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Chatbots/text generators are the most common platform teens use for schoolwork Percent of teens who have used various types of generative AI to help with school assignmentsChatbots/text generato

248、rs63%Search engines with AI-generated results57%Image generators23%Video generators13%Note:Q:What types of generative AI have you used for school assignments?The respondents included in this chart were 420 young people age 1318 who have used generative AI to help with school assignments.Source:Commo

249、n Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.Although there are no differences based on age,grade,or gender,the types of generative AI used for assignments vary by race and ethnicity.White teens are more likely to have used chatbots

250、/text generators(68%)compared to Latino teens(53%).Conversely,Latino teens are more likely to have used image generators for schoolwork(30%)than White teens(18%),echoing patterns of overall use of each gen AI tool,where Latino and Black teens are significantly more likely to use this type of gen AI.

251、Again,similar to findings in overall use by tool,both Black(20%)and Latino teens(18%)are about three times as likely as White teens(6%)to say they have used video generators for school.Variations also surface in use of generative AI for school by the educational background of parents.Among teens who

252、 have used gen AI to help with school assignments,those whose parent has a college degree are more likely to have used chat-bots/text generators(71%)than those whose parent does not have a college degree(55%).However,teens who have a parent without a college degree are more likely to report using se

253、arch engines with AI-generated results(64%)than teens whose parent has a college degree(50%).Generative AI in the ClassroomVery few teens(7%)report that their teachers mostly allow students to use generative AI.A little over 4 in 10 teens(42%)say that teachers mostly do not allow students to use gen

254、 AI.Only 7%of teens age 13 to 18 report that their teachers mostly allow students to use generative AI,compared to 42%who say their teachers mostly do not allow students to use gen AI.More than one-quarter of teens(27%)say their teachers have not mentioned generative AI,and 23%are not sure.More than

255、 one-third(37%)of teens report that their teachers talked with them about new rules at their school to restrict the use of AI for graded assignments.Many teens report that teachers do not allow generative AI Percent of teens who indicate that their teachers have discussed use of gen AI in the follow

256、ing waysMostly do not allow students to use gen AI42%Teachers have not mentioned gen AI27%Mostly allow students to use gen AI7%Not sure23%Note:Q:When it comes to generative AI,do your teachers?The respondents included in this chart were 1,045 young people age 1318.Source:Common Sense Media survey co

257、nducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.Reports of teachers allowing or not allowing students to use generative AI vary by race and ethnicity.Black teens(13%)are more likely to say their teachers mostly allow students to use generative AI than White(

258、7%)and Latino teens(7%).27 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Among teens who use generative AI for school assignments,almost equal proportions of teens do so with or without their teachers permission.Teens

259、 who report using generative AI to help with school assignments were prompted to think about the most recent time they used generative AI to help with a school assignment and whether this use of generative AI was with their teachers permission.About 4 in 10(41%)teens who use generative AI to help wi

260、th schoolwork did the most recent assignment with their teachers permission,and almost the same proportion of teens,46%,used gen AI for the assignment without the teachers permission.Only 12%of teens are not sure whether they used these platforms with their teachers permission.2929 Another possible

261、option is that teens may not have been given explicit permission or specifically denied permission to use these tools.We attempted to capture this using the not sure option.The sample sizes for certain subgroups were relatively small for this question,and there were no significant differences by age

262、,grade,gender,race/ethnicity,or LGBTQ+identity.Two in five teens say they use generative AI for schoolwork,with a nearly even split between those using with and without teacher permission Percent of teens who have used gen AI for school assignments,and those who did so with or without teachers permi

263、ssion60%No,I have not used gen AI to help with schoolwork40%Yes,I have used gen AI to help with schoolwork46%Yes,without my teachers permission41%Yes,with my teachers permission12%Yes,but unsure if with teachers permissionNote:Total amounts may not sum to 100%from the reported subtotals due to round

264、ing and nonresponse.Q:Have you ever used generative AI to help with your school assignments?If a teen answered yes,they were given the following question:As a reminder,this survey is entirely confidential.Thinking about the most recent time when you used generative AI to help with a school assignmen

265、t,was it with your teachers permission or not?The respondents included in this chart were 452 young people age 1318 who have ever used generative AI to help with school assignments.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their pa

266、rents.THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 28 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Teens who participated in class discussions with teachers about allowing or restricting the use of generative AI were more likely to have their schoolwork submitt

267、ed by teachers to AI detection software.According to teens,a notable number of teachers discuss gen AI rules or use programs to check for student gen AI use in the classroom.Over one-third(37%)say that their teachers talked about new rules at their school to restrict the use of AI for graded assignm

268、ents.Among teens who reported that teach-ers talked to them about allowing or restricting the use of gen AI,almost 3 in 10(29%)indicate that teachers submitted their writing to software to detect whether they had used generative AI.Differences emerge by age,with teens age 15 to 18 more likely than t

269、hose age 13 to 14 to say that teachers have submit-ted their writing to gen AI detection software(32%vs.23%).Compared to their White and Latino peers,Black teens are about twice as likely to report that teachers flagged their schoolwork as being created by generative AI when it was not.Only 1 in 10(

270、10%)teens report that teachers have flagged their schoolwork as being created by generative AI when it was not.About 70%of young people who had their work flagged by a teacher have also had their work submitted to AI detection software,and 27%of them say their work had not been submitted.Black teens

271、 are more likely than White or Latino teens to say that teachers flagged their schoolwork as being created by generative AI when it was not(20%vs.7%and 10%,respec-tively).Such a finding is particularly concerning given that the use of gen AI among teens for schoolwork may exacer-bate existing discip

272、line disparities among historically marginalized groups.30,31 In the United States,Black students face the highest rate of disciplinary measures in both public and private schools32despite being no more likely to misbehavewhich contributes to negative impacts such as lower academic performance.33 Ov

273、er half of teens(53%)say they have not had class discussions or lessons about generative AI.Overall,a bit more than a third of teens report having class discussions or lessons about generative AI(37%).Over half of teens age 13 to 18(53%)say they have not had class discus-sions or lessons about gener

274、ative AI in school.One in 10 teens are not sure(10%).Over a third of teens report having had class discussions or lessons about generative AI Percent of teens who indicate whether they had class discussions or lessons about gen AI10%Not sure37%Yes53%NoNote:Q:Have you had any class discussions or les

275、sons about generative AI?The respondents included in this chart were 1,045 young people age 1318.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.30 Woelfel,K.(2023,December 18).Brief Late applications:Disproportionate effec

276、ts of generative AI-detectors on English learners.Center for Democracy&Technology.https:/cdt.org/insights/brief-late-applications-disproportionate-effects-of-generative-ai-detectors-on-english-learners/31 Peterson,E.(2021).Racial inequality in public school discipline for Black students in the Unite

277、d States.Ballard Center.https:/ballardbrief.byu.edu/issue-briefs/racial-inequality-in-public-school-discipline-for-black-students-in-the-united-states32 Institute of Education Sciences.(2019,February).Indicator 15:Retention,suspension,and expulsion.National Center for Education Statistics.https:/nce

278、s.ed.gov/programs/raceindicators/indicator_rda.asp33 Morris,E.W.,&Perry,B.L.(2016).The punishment gap:School suspension and racial disparities in achievement.Social Problems,63(1),6886.https:/doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv02629 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HO

279、ME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Only 11%of teens report that their teachers have asked them to look for false information,bias,or harmful stereotypes in generative AI outputs,highlighting a potential area for teacher education and support.Few teens report that their teachers hav

280、e suggested that teens use generative AI as part of a homework assignment(11%),but boys(14%)are more likely than girls(9%)to indicate that teachers suggested they use a gen AI platform as part of a homework assignment.A minority of teachers have asked teens to look for bias,harmful stereotypes,or fa

281、lse informa-tion in generative AI outputs(11%).Teens report various types of generative AI use by teachers in the classroom Percent of teens whose teachers mostly do or do not allow the use of gen AI,who indicate that their teachers do the followingFlagged your schoolwork as being created by gen AI

282、when it was notSuggested you use a gen AI platform as part of a homework assignmentAsked you to look for bias,harmful stereotypes,or false info in gen AI outputsAsked you to enter your writing into a gen AI platform for help editing or organizing your thoughtsUsed gen AI to brainstorm ideas as a par

283、t of a lesson or projectSubmitted your writing to software to detect whether you have used gen AITalked about new rules at school to restrict the use of AI for graded assignments37%29%20%14%11%11%10%Note:Q:Thinking about the following,have any of your teachers?The respondents included in this chart

284、were 771 young people age 1318 whose teachers mostly do or do not allow students to use generative AI.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.Black teens are most likely to have schoolwork incorrectly flagged as cre

285、ated by generative AI Percent of teens whose teacher(s)flagged their schoolwork as being created by gen AI when it was not,by race/ethnicityBlack Latino WhiteYes20%*10%7%No68%66%79%*Not sure13%13%23%*Note:Total amounts may not sum to 100%from the reported subtotals due to rounding and nonresponse.Ba

286、rs with an asterisk differ significantly from the other bars within each response option(p .05).Q:Thinking about the following,have any of your teachers?The respondents included in this chart were 771 young people age 1318 whose teachers mostly do or do not allow students to use generative AI.Source

287、:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.Teens report that some teachers integrate generative AI into lessons,brainstorming,editing,or planning their work.Some teachers have begun to integrate generative AI into their teac

288、hing,with 2 in 10(20%)teens reporting that their teachers have used generative AI to brainstorm ideas in class as part of a lesson or project.Black teens are more likely than White and Latino teens to say that their teachers used genera-tive AI for this type of brainstorming(30%vs.19%and 19%,respect

289、ively).Slightly over 1 in 10 teens(14%)say their teach-ers have asked them to enter their writing into a generative AI platform for help with editing or organizing their thoughts.Black teens more often say that their teachers asked them to use generative AI for help with writing,editing,or organizin

290、g thoughts than White and Latino teens(27%vs.11%and 13%).THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 30 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.34 Google Cloud.(n.d.).What are AI hallucinations?https:/ who had class discussions or lessons about generative

291、 AI are more likely to say they have checked other sources or verified the accuracy of gen AI outputs.Class discussions or lessons may have important implications for teens inclination to verify generative AI.Teens who had class discussions or lessons about gen AI are more likely than teens who have

292、 not had class discussions to report having checked other sources to verify the accuracy of their genera-tive AI outputs(55%vs.43%).Similarly,parents use of generative AI is also linked to teens accuracy verification practices.Teens whose parent has used any generative AI at all are more likely to v

293、erify the accuracy of gen AI(53%)compared to teens whose parent has never used gen AI(36%).More than two in five(43%)teens have not checked other sources to verify the accuracy of generative AI outputs for school assignments.As gen AI has rolled out,concerns have emerged about its challenges around

294、accuracy and tendency toward hallucina-tions34 in the results it returns.These concerns are especially acute in the school setting,where educators and other adults worry about learners new to a topic being misled by inaccu-rate content.Among teens who have used generative AI for school assignments,a

295、lmost half(49%)have ever checked other sources to verify the accuracy of their gen AI outputs created for school assignments.A little less than half(43%)have not checked other sources to verify their gen AI outputs for school assignments.Significant differences in verifying the accuracy of at least

296、some generative AI outputs emerge by age.Older teens age 15 to 18(55%)are significantly more likely to check other sources to verify the accuracy of their gen AI outputs created for school assignments than younger teens age 13 to 14(35%).Older teens are more likely than younger teens to verify accur

297、acy of generative AI outputs for schoolwork Percent of teens who have used gen AI for school assignments and who indicate whether they have checked other sources to verify gen AI outputsYesNoNot sureTeens age 1314 Teens age 151835%55%*51%*38%14%*6%Note:*Differences between teens age 1314 and teens a

298、ge 1518 are statistically significant at the level of p .05.Q:Do you ever check other sources to verify the accuracy of your generative AI outputs created for school assignments?The respondents included in this chart were 452 young people age 1318 who have used generative AI to help with school assi

299、gnments.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.31 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Some notable differences emerge by

300、race/ethnicity and parent education.Parents of Black teens are more likely than parents of White teens to say that their childs school has com-municated with them about how generative AI will be used in the classroom(17%vs.8%).Parents of Latino teens are more likely to say that their childs school h

301、as not communicated with them about gen AI compared to parents of Black teens(86%vs.76%).In terms of parent education,parents with no college degree more often report that their childs school had not communicated with them about generative AI(89%)com-pared with parents who have a college degree(77%)

302、.Over one-third of teens(35%)report that their school has rules for how generative AI can be used,and teens tend to be more knowledgeable about school rules than parents.Understanding teens AI use for schoolwork requires under-standing the rules and policies in place from teachers,administrators,and

303、 school systems around AI use at and for school.Slightly over one-third of teens(35%)report that they have school rules for how generative AI might be used,and about one-quarter(27%)say they do not have any school rules around gen AI.Still,a substantial number of teens are uncer-tain about the statu

304、s of AI rules at school,with 37%of teens saying they are not sure if there are school rules for gen AI.35 Parents are even more uncertain than their teens.Six in 10 parents(60%)are not sure whether their childs school has rules,while a mere 16%say their teens school has rules,and another quarter(24%

305、)say it does not have rules.Given parents reports of lack of communication from schools,its not surprising that many parents are not sure whether their teens school has rules about the use of gen AI.The share of teens who report whether rules are in place differs by age,ethnicity,and parent educatio

306、n.Teens age 15 to 18 are more likely to say that their school has rules for how generative AI can be used(39%)than teens age 13 to 14(30%).Black teens,compared to their Latino peers,are more likely to report that their school has no rules for how gen AI can be used(34%vs.22%).Teens with a parent who

307、 has a college degree are more likely to say that their school has rules for how generative AI can be used compared to teens with a parent without a college degree(42%vs.30%).Generative AI School Rules and Policies Most parents of teens say that their teens school has not communicated with them abou

308、t generative AI.Around 8 in 10(83%)parents of a teen age 13 to 18 say that their childs school has not communicated with them about generative AI;16%of parents report that the school has com-municated with them.Among all parents,only 10%report that their childs school discussed how generative AI wil

309、l be used in the classroom,and a mere 4%say the school relayed informa-tion about school policy banning generative AI.Most parents have not heard from schools about generative AI Percent of parents who indicate the following about how and if their childs school has communicated with them about gen A

310、I4%Yes,about banning it83%No,they have not communicated about it10%Yes,about how it will be used in the classroom3%Yes,about something elseNote:Q:Has your 13-to 18-year-old childs school communicated with you about generative AI?The respondents included in this chart were 1,045 parents of young peop

311、le age 1318.Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.35 We did not ask specifically about what type of rules or guidance the schools had.If parents or teens indicate that there are generative AI rules at school,these

312、 could be rules that allow the use of generative AI under certain circumstances.THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 32 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Parents report lack of school communication about generative AI school policies Percent

313、of parents who say that their teens school communicated or did not communicate with them about gen AINo School RulesNo Communication Yes,about banning itYes,about how it will be used in the classroomYes,about something else.Has School Rules66%9%20%5%91%2%5%1%Note:Q for parents:Has your 13-to 18-year

314、-olds school communicated with you about generative AI?Q for teens:To your knowledge,does your school have rules for how generative AI can be used?Source:Common Sense Media survey conducted by Ipsos,March 15April 20,2024,with 1,045 young people age 1318 and their parents.Taken together,differences i

315、n knowledge between teens and parents regarding school rules about generative AIand gaps in communication between schools and parentssuggest that teens may be more aware of their schools policies than their parents,and that more communication about gen AI seems to be happening in the classroom and a

316、t school,rather than externally for parents and caregivers.Two-thirds of parents have not received communication about generative AI from their teens school,despite the school having rules for gen AI.Among teens age 13 to 18 who report attending a school that has rules for how generative AI can be u

317、sed,only 35%of their parents say that their childs school has communicated with them about generative AI,while 66%have not received any communication.Among the 35%of parents who have received communication,9%heard from the school about banning it,20%learned about how it will be used in the classroom

318、,and 5%heard about something else.33 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL 34 COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Ge

319、nerative AI presents an array of opportunities and chal-lenges in the educational space.On the one hand,these systems can promote learning gains by meeting students where they are and adapting to their needs,36 supporting stu-dents on creative tasks,37 and encouraging project-based learning and coll

320、aboration.On the other hand,gen AI tools can widen educational divides,38 provide inaccurate information,39 facilitate cheating,and amplify concerns related to privacy and bias.40 Recent research suggests that many teens are optimistic about the potential impact of generative AI on education,with 45

321、%agreeing that these systems,such as AI chatbots,may help students learn more and faster.41 Students who are famil-iar with these tools are more likely to endorse the promises of generative AI.Many parents,too,see the possible advantages;research indicates that over two-thirds of parents feel that t

322、he potential upsides of using AI in K12 education outweigh or are equal to the possible downsides.42 In order to maximize benefits while minimizing risks,it is crucial to understand how youth,together with their parents,think about the current impact that generative AI is already having in schools,a

323、s well as their expectations for how it might change in the future.43 Teens See Positives and Negatives of AI for Learning in School Comparable shares of teens believe that generative AI plat-forms will have a somewhat to very positive impact44 on their learning,both in school45(44%)and outside of s

324、chool(45%).On the other hand,more teens indicate that AI platforms will have a somewhat to very negative impact46 on their learning in school(25%),versus outside of it(17%).Black and Latino youth are more likely to believe that generative AI could improve learning in school,but Latino youth are more

325、 likely to have negative views about the impact on out-of-school learning.Black and Latino youth are more likely than White youth to indicate that gen AI platforms will have a positive impact on their learning in school(55%and 50%vs.38%).At the same time,nearly twice as many Latino teens as Black te

326、ens believe that these platforms will have a negative impact on their learn-ing outside of school(20%vs.12%).Part 3:Generative AI in Education:Exploring the Benefits,Risks,and Impacts on Equity with Teens and Parents36 Office of Educational Technology.(2023,May).Artificial intelligence and the futur

327、e of teaching and learning:Insights and recommendations.U.S.Department of Education.https:/www2.ed.gov/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf37 Milne,S.(2023,September 25).Q&A:Can AI in school actually help students be more creative and self-directed?Phys.org.https:/phys.org/news/2023-09-qa-ai-school-stu

328、dents-creative.html38 Imada,B.(2024,April 1).Generative AIs impact on students of color and diverse students.USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.https:/annenberg.usc.edu/research/center-public-relations/usc-annenberg-relevance-report/generative-ais-impact-students-color39 Office of

329、 Educational Technology.(2023,May).Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning:Insights and recommendations.U.S.Department of Education.https:/www2.ed.gov/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf40 Akgun,S.,&Greenhow,C.(2022).Artificial intelligence in education:Addressing ethical chall

330、enges in K12 settings.AI and Ethics,2(3),431440.https:/doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-741 Walton Family Foundation.(2024,June 11).AI chatbots in schools:Findings from a poll of K12 teachers,students,parents,and college undergraduates.https:/www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org/learning/the-value-of-ai-i

331、n-todays-classrooms42 National Parents Union.(2023,October 17).New poll:Parents see potential of artificial intelligence to enhance learning,but uncertainty persists.https:/nationalparentsunion.org/2023/10/17/new-poll-parents-see-potential-of-artificial-intelligence-to-enhance-learning-but-uncertain

332、ty-persists/43 Holmes,W.,&Miao,F.(2023).Guidance for generative AI in education and research.UNESCO Publishing.https:/doi.org/10.54675/EWZM953544 In the remainder of Part Three,positive refers to somewhat or very positive.45 Please note that in school refers to both learning at school and to out-of-

333、school academic work.The question reads:What kind of impact do you think AI platforms like generative AI will have on your learning at school/school related?46 In the remainder of Part Three,negative refers to somewhat or very negative.35 THE DAWN OF THE AI ERA:TEENS,PARENTS,AND THE ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE AI AT HOME AND SCHOOL COMMON SENSE MEDIA.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.In a shift from other data in th