《BCG:2025全球基礎設施投資展望報告:資產類別成熟下的戰略布局與價值創造路徑(英文版)(37頁).pdf》由會員分享,可在線閱讀,更多相關《BCG:2025全球基礎設施投資展望報告:資產類別成熟下的戰略布局與價值創造路徑(英文版)(37頁).pdf(37頁珍藏版)》請在三個皮匠報告上搜索。
1、INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY 2025How Investors Can Gain Advantage as the Asset Class MaturesMarch 2025 By Wilhelm Schmundt,Alex Wright,Benjamin Entraygues,Lauren Powers,Emmanuel Austruy,Thomas Bumberger,Sunil Chandrasekhar,Andrew Claerhout,David ONeil,and Julien VialadeContents03 Introduction 04 The Stat
2、e of the Industry10 Building for the Future 12 Geographic and Sector Analysis 26 The Expanding Infrastructure Mandate 34 ConclusionBOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 3Over the past two decades,private infrastructure investment has delivered a reliable
3、stream of steady returns and served as a major source of capital for the roads,seaports,airports,energy generation and transmission,broadband systems,data centers,and more on which our global society and global economy depend.In the past ten years alone,private infrastructure assets under management
4、(AuM)have more than quadrupled,to$1.3 trillion.But as this years report on the state of private infrastructure investing shows,while infrastructure assets under management continue to grow,deal volume declined in 2024 compared to the previous year,and fundraising is still down 43%from 2022s peak,des
5、pite growing 14%year-over-year.Moreover,the overall geopolitical situation remains unstable,even as interest rates have stabilized after falling from their recent peaks.The highly uncertain macroeconomic environment remains a concern as well,especially following the recent elections in the US.The ne
6、w administration is engaged in a major revamping of the countrys administration and budget,which is likely to create unforeseen changes in multiple areas related to government and regulation,with as yet unclear impacts on global trade.The situation is kinetic and is generating considerable uncertain
7、ty for investors of all kinds.Despite the headwinds,however,we believe that the near-term prospects for private investment in infrastructure assets has improved since last years report.We see indications of further momentum in both investment and dealmaking.We also believe that high-level data does
8、not fully reveal an underlying shift in how investors are approaching the infrastructure asset class.The industry is maturing,its mandate is changing,and both general partners(GPs)and limited partners(LPs)are responding in ways that will positively affect performance.Firms are consolidating to build
9、 scale or specialize,expanding their investment options,and improving their operational capabilities,resulting in offerings that are more carefully tuned to the current and future investment environment than ever.In this years report,we provide both the data needed to better understand the current s
10、tate of private infrastructure investing and an in-depth analysis of how the industry is upping its game in an increasingly complex environment.IntroductionBOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 4The past two years have been challenging for private investm
11、ents overall,including private infrastructure.High interest rates,inflation,and widespread economic uncertainty have weighed on fundraising,deal volume,and valuations.After reaching record highs in 2022,valuations slid in 2023 before beginning to recover in mid-2024 as the interest rate environment
12、in some regions of the world started to cool.Despite these challenges,LPs remain firmly committed to the infrastructure asset class,and expectations for new fundraising remain high.Private infrastructure continues to be a highly attractive investment,offering long-term stability and inflation protec
13、tion even in volatile markets.Infrastructure AuM Infrastructure AuM has grown significantly over the past ten yearsby an average of 16%per year from 2014 to 2024,versus average growth of 13%for all private capital over the same period.Despite the slowdown in fundraising from 2022 to 2024,the latest
14、available data on infrastructure AuM puts it at an all-time high of$1.3 trillion as of June 2024.(See Exhibit 1.)The industrys growth over the past ten years has trailed only that of venture capital.The stable and predictable cash flows that these assets offer and their resilience to economic cycles
15、 make infrastructure AuM an appealing defensive investment in volatile markets.The essential services that these assets providesuch as energy,transportation,and communicationsremain in demand regardless of economic conditions.More than two-thirds of infrastructure AuM are held in core and core-plus
16、strategy funds.Clearly,many investors still prefer lower-risk,income-generating assets,even though the gap between these investments and the yield from infrastructure debt has narrowed recently.In fact,funds that pursue higher-risk,value-added strategies have grown steadily,reaching$312 billion in J
17、une 2024.This suggests that many investors are gradually moving up the risk curve,diversifying and increasing their exposure to infrastructure assets that may have considerable growth potential,offer opportunities for incremental large-scale capex deployment,or can be de-risked and repositioned as c
18、ore or core-plus assets.The State of the Industry BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 5Still,infrastructure investors new appetite for risk goes only so far.AuM at the riskiest opportunistic funds has experienced relatively slow growth over the past dec
19、adea compound annual growth rate(CAGR)of just 6.8%compared to a CAGR of 16.2%for core funds,signaling that GPs prefer to maintain a balanced portfolio with respect to risk,in response to widespread LP investor demand for stable,broadly diversified assets across investment strategies.FundraisingInfra
20、structure funds raised a total of$87 billion in 2024,a 14%increase over the$76 billion raised in 2023 but still down 43%relative to 2022.(See Exhibit 2.)In addition to the negative impact of the interest rate environment and ongoing geopolitical concerns,fundraising continues to be affected by the s
21、lowdown in distributions to LPs,as funds hold investments longer than they did in the past.Net capital distributed back to LPs from infrastructure funds was negative$19.7 billion in 2023 and negative$28.7 billion in 2022.The lack of capital returned constrains the ability of LPs to recycle cash dist
22、ributions into new-vintage funds that are currently raising money.Further affecting the slowdown in fundraising are the sheer size of many infrastructure funds and the time it takes them to reach their fundraising targets in an increasingly competitive fundraising environment.The fully funded size o
23、f the average closed-end fund grew 92%from 2014 to 2024,and larger funds generally take longer to reach their final close.The average time to close a fund,which was 20 months just a decade ago,reached 31 months in 2024.(See Exhibit 3.)Still,the year-over-year increase in fundraising in 2024,offers g
24、rounds for optimism.Dry PowderWith the slowdown in fundraising and continued capital deploymentalbeit at a reduced leveldry powder as of June 2024 was down 9%from the end of 2023.(See Exhibit 4.)As fundraising accelerates,we expect to see dry powder rebound commensurately.EXHIBIT 1Infrastructure AuM
25、 Has Quadrupled over the Past DecadeSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:AuM=assets under management;CAGR=compound annual growth rate.1Data for 20142024 consists of actuals from Preqins Charts tool.Data for 2028F is a forward projection from Preqin.In all cases,data is global.2Latest AuM data available
26、is as of June 2024.3Infrastructure fundraising includes four fund strategies:core,core-plus,value-added,and opportunistic.CAGR20142024(%)516131313Total77181211312121220142.22.32.63.03.44.04.76.06.26.97.110.60.30.40.50.60.60.70.81.01.11.21.32.14.65.05.76.67.58.810.513.614.215.215.120.92015Private equ
27、ity20162017201820192020202120222023202422028FPrivate capital AuM by asset class($trillions)1CAGR20192024(%)Private debtVenture capitalInfrastructure3Real estateNatural resources13%Sources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:AuM=assets under management;CAGR=compound annual growth rate.1Data for 20142024 consist
28、s of actuals from Preqins Charts tool.Data for 2028F is a forward projection from Preqin.In all cases,data is global.2Latest AuM data available is as of June 2024.3Infrastructure fundraising includes four fund strategies:core,core-plus,value-added,and opportunistic.Infrastructure AuM Has Quadrupled
29、over the Past DecadeEXHIBIT 1BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 6EXHIBIT 2Fundraising Increased by 14%from the Low in 2023,Suggesting Increased Momentum Going into 2025EXHIBIT 3Fundraising Times Have Increased over the Past Decade to an All-Time High o
30、f 31 MonthsSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Because of rounding,not all bar segment totals equal the sum given above each bar.1Data as of December 31,2024.Infrastructure fundraising includes four fund strategies:core,core-plus,value-added,and opportunistic.2Including Russia.3Includes Australia,New Z
31、ealand,Papua New Guinea,and various Pacific islands.4Includes Africa,the Middle East,and Latin American and the Caribbean,as well as diversified multiregional funds.Sources:Preqin;BCG analysis.1Data as of December 31,2024.Infrastructure fundraising includes four fund strategies:core,core-plus,value-
32、added,and opportunistic.2Includes only final close for closedend fund sizes.Global infrastructure fundraising byprimary region focus($billions)1Global infrastructure fundraising byfund strategy($billions)120152650167201616591312201733353342018205533520194233201120205035515202149633752022134811520233
33、2153642024115618999910511310614115476721610201423211998751%+14%CoreCore-plusValue-addedOpportunistic2015264622016292732112017453915620185642772019453027142020487012324202177619720224130311192023224514620241056729999105113106141154987224201427192067651%+14%North AmericaOther4AsiaEurope2Australasia3So
34、urces:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Because of rounding,not all bar segment totals equal the sum given above each bar.1Data as of December 31,2024.Infrastructure fundraising includes four fund strategies:core,core-plus,value-added,and opportunistic.2Including Russia.3Includes Australia,New Zealand,Papua
35、New Guinea,and various Pacific islands.4Includes Africa,the Middle East,and Latin American and the Caribbean,as well as diversified multiregional funds.Fundraising Increased by 14%from the Low in 2023,Suggesting Increased Momentum Going into 2025EXHIBIT 2Average time to final close for infrastructur
36、e funds,20142024(months)1Months to final closeAverage fund size($millions)22020211923222721283101020304005001,0001,5002014201520162017Months to final closeAverage fund size201820192020202120222023202420Sources:Preqin;BCG analysis.1Data as of December 31,2024.Infrastructure fundraising includes four
37、fund strategies:core,core-plus,value-added,and opportunistic.2Includes only final close for closedend fund sizes.Fundraising Times Have Increased over the Past Decade to an All-Time High of 31 MonthsEXHIBIT 3BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 7EXHIBIT
38、4After Rising by 14%Annually over the Past Decade,Dry Powder Declined by 9%in the First Half of 2024 but Is Expected to Pick Up as Interest Rates DeclineSource:Preqin.Note:Because of rounding,not all bar segment totals equal the sum given above the bar.CAGR=compound annual growth rate.1Infrastructur
39、e dry powder as of June 2024.Infrastructure fundraising includes four fund strategies:core,core-plus,value-added,and opportunistic.Global infrastructure dry powder by fund type,JanuaryJune 2024($billions)CAGR20142023(%)454681102831081171161381461352528505453668284969993293638455264709585937918182722
40、20182020162017201820191720202021162022202317314171414TotalJune 20241 1520142015114129187228209257286312334357324+14%9%CoreCore-plusValue-addedOpportunisticSource:Preqin.Note:Because of rounding,not all bar segment totals equal the sum given above the bar.CAGR=compound annual growth rate.1Infrastruct
41、ure dry powder as of June 2024.Infrastructure fundraising includes four fund strategies:core,core-plus,value-added,and opportunistic.After Rising by 14%Annually over the Past Decade,Dry Powder Declined by 9%in the First Half of 2024 but Is Expected to Pick Up as Interest Rates DeclineEXHIBIT 4Limite
42、d Partner Allocations Despite the slowdown in fundraising and capital returned to investors,the average allocation to infrastructure across all types of LPs rose from 1.3%in 2019 to 2.1%in 2023,suggesting that LPs remained committed to allocating an increasing proportion of their funds to infrastruc
43、ture.This reflects growing confidence in the asset class,especially during periods of market volatility.Overall,31%of LPs plan to increase their allocation to infrastructure,the third most among all asset classes,and only 24%plan to decrease it.(See Exhibit 5.)Deal VolumeIn keeping with the trends g
44、overning fundraising,the number of infrastructure deals completed in 2024 declined by 8%,following a 19%decline in 2023.The average deal size,too,is trending below the 2023 mark and is 40%below the peak in 2021.(See Exhibit 6.)Several factors are contributing to the ongoing decline in deal activity.
45、First,GPs bought some assets at relatively high valuations.But now,as multiples return to pre-COVID-19 levels,owners are holding them longer and waiting for a more favorable selling climate.(See Exhibit 7.)Meanwhile,some sponsors have resorted to more creative exit options,such as divesting pieces o
46、f assets,considering IPOs,and moving assets into continuation vehicles.Second,as investors look to complete more core-plus and value-added deals,ongoing valuation mismatches and a slower recovery in sponsor-to-sponsor transactions are constraining deal flow and contributing to smaller transaction si
47、zes.Still,some very large transactions have recently taken place,suggesting a continuing focus on asset quality and scale.These include KKR Infrastructures acquisition of Telecom Italias network business for around$20 billion and Blackstones and CPPs acquisition of AirTrunk for$16 billion.Yet there
48、is reason for optimism here as well,thanks largely to the need for sponsors to exit investments and return capital to LPs.Importantly,demand for infrastructure investment has not slowedif anything,it is growing.Private investors remain keen on identifying opportunities in high-growth sectors such as
49、 data centers and the energy transition,while governments worldwide are actively courting private capital to help fund public infrastructure projects.BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 8EXHIBIT 5Over 30%of LPs Plan to Increase Their Allocation to Infra
50、structure,the Third Most of Any Asset ClassEXHIBIT 6The Number of Infrastructure Deals Declined Again in 2024,as Did Average Deal SizeSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Results are in response to the following survey question:“How much capital do you plan to invest in the next 12 months compared with
51、the previous 12?”LP=limited partner.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.Sources:Preqin;BCG analysis.1Average deal size calculated based on a subset of 30%of global deals,per available data.2Megadeals are defined as deals with a value of$1 billion or more.Capital alloca
52、tion plans of LPs,2024(%of respondents)17288353224414851424744454335215018253116Private equity100%Venture capitalPrivate debtHedge fundsReal estateInfrastructureNatural resourcesIncrease allocationMaintain allocationDecrease allocationSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Results are in response to the f
53、ollowing survey question:“How much capital do you plan to invest in the next 12 months compared with the previous 12?”LP=limited partner.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.Over 30%of LPs Plan to Increase Their Allocation to Infrastructure,the Third Most of Any Asset C
54、lassEXHIBIT 5Infrastructure global deal count and average deal size,20192024Deal count(number)Average deal size($millions)12,9052,5322,6802,1611,98368643670954649742801,0002,0003,00002004006008002019202020212022202320242,602Average deal size($millions)1Global deals967483114709519%8%Number of megadea
55、ls2Sources:Preqin;BCG analysis.1Average deal size calculated based on a subset of 30%of global deals,per available data.2Megadeals are defined as deals with a value of$1 billion or more.The Number of Infrastructure Deals Declined Again in 2024,as Did Average Deal SizeEXHIBIT 6BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP
56、HOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 9EXHIBIT 7Public Infrastructure Company Multiples Have Decreased Since 2021Sources:CapIQ;Pitchbook;BCG analysis.1Multiples for each year are calculated as total enterprise value divided by EBITDA for the previous twelve months at years end.
57、Average of 9,144 publicly listed infrastructure companiesincluding companies in the energy,transportation,telecommunications,and utilities sectorsglobally.Public infrastructure multiples,20142024119.121.321.221.318.918.419.222.620.419.519.320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024+4%12%+1%+18%5%S
58、ources:CapIQ;Pitchbook;BCG analysis.1Multiples for each year are calculated as total enterprise value divided by EBITDA for the previous twelve months at years end.Average of 9,144 publicly listed infrastructure companiesincluding companies in the energy,transportation,telecommunications,and utiliti
59、es sectorsglobally.Public Infrastructure Company Multiples Have Decreased Since 2021EXHIBIT 7BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 10Although the past two years have seen a considerable slowdown in fundraising and deal volume,we believe that the situation
60、 will return to historical patterns.Beyond improving macroeconomic conditionsincluding stabilizing or declining interest rates in some regionsthe fundamental need for infrastructure remains significant across the globe.Core sectors such as energy,transport,and logistics continue to require major inv
61、estments if they are to support economic growth,modernization,and resilience.By 2040,according to the G20s Global Infrastructure Hub,the gap between required infrastructure investment and current spending trends will stand at$15 trillion and will continue to widen as the worlds population grows,urba
62、nization increases,and further economic development occurs.Moreover,the rapid expansion of digital infrastructuredriven by surging demand for data processing,cloud computing,and AIhas created a pressing need for additional investments in data centers,fiber networks,and next-generation connectivity s
63、olutions.Together,these dynamics present substantial opportunities for investors seeking exposure to essential infrastructure assets that can serve long-term growth and demand.Further investment will also be necessary to help global society adapt to climate change.But the rise of generative AI and t
64、he resulting increase in demand for connectivity are spurring the greatest interest,accelerating the need for high-capacity data infrastructure and fiber networks.Meanwhile,in developing economies,rising industrial activity,economic expansion,and population growth are sharpening the need for large-s
65、cale investment in roads,rail,and other transportation infrastructure to support trade,mobility,and supply chains.We see large opportunities to update aging infrastructure,too.In North America alone,the American Society of Civil Engineers anticipates an infrastructure investment gap of around$4 tril
66、lion through 2033,including$1 trillion in surface transportation and$60 billion in energy.Outside North America,significant investment is essential to modernize road networks,upgrade fiber-optic cables,expand mobile towers,and build electric vehicle(EV)charging infrastructure and smart meters.The wo
67、rlds power grids alone will require 8 million kilometers of upgrades,according to the International Energy Agency(IEA).Building for the FutureBOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 11Governments alone cannot meet these needs.Closing the infrastructure gap
68、by 2040 will necessitate strategic partnerships between the public and private sectors.Policies such as the European Green Deal,Chinas Belt and Road Investment,and the USs Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act have injected much-needed funds into infrastructure,but private investment will still be
69、crucial.To meet this demand,investors have increasingly been engaging in joint ventures,soliciting co-investments from LPs,and employing public-private partnerships(PPPs).For example,government planners adopted a design-build-finance-maintain mode to construct the replacement of the Goethals Bridge
70、between the US state of New Jersey and Staten Island in New York.Begun in 2014 and completed in 2018,the project was structured as a PPP between the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and a private consortium led by Macquarie and Kiewit Development.Similarly,the UKs$5.3 billion Thames Tideway
71、 Tunnel was funded entirely by private investors,led by Bazalgette Tunnel Ltd,a private consortium backed by Allianz Capital Partners,Dalmore Capital,IFM Investors,Amber Infrastructure Group,and Swiss Life Asset Managers.To truly spur long-term investment in public infrastructure,however,regulators
72、must do more to create investment frameworks that enable private investors to recapture their cost of capital predictably and sustainably.One step in the right direction is the UKs National Wealth Fund(NWF),which is using public capital to de-risk infrastructure projects and attract institutional in
73、vestors.With 5.8 billion in initial public funding and a goal of unlocking 70 billion in private investment,the NWF focuses on key sectors such as green hydrogen,gigafactories,and carbon capture and storage(CCS),demonstrating how government-backed co-investment can help bridge the infrastructure fin
74、ancing gap.In short,we believe that momentum for increased private-sector investment in infrastructure will continue to build in the coming years.BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 12Today,most infrastructure activity remains concentrated in developed
75、markets in Europe and North America,where 75%of the 932 portfolio companies held by the 58 largest infrastructure investors are located.(See Exhibit 8.)Faced with the challenges extending across the private infrastructure landscape in 2024,deal volume and deal size fell in almost every region and se
76、ctor.Average deal size in 2024 was flat or down compared to 2023 across all regions.As was the case last year,Australia had the highest average deal size in 2024,at approximately$900 million,while Asia had the lowest,at approximately$200 million.North America and Australia have the highest average d
77、eal size over the past five years,at$900 million,with Europe next,at$500 million.Deal size also declined across each of the four sectors analyzed,except for digital infrastructure,which saw an average deal size of$900 million in 2024.(See Exhibit 9.)Geographic and Sector AnalysisEXHIBIT 8Most Infras
78、tructure Activity Is Concentrated in Europe and North AmericaSource:BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing more than 75%of all infrastructure assets under management.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%
79、.Portfolio companies by geography and sector,2023 and 2024(total number)NorthAmericaEuropeAsiaLatin Americaand CaribbeanMiddle Eastand AfricaAustralasia20232024Energy and environmentTransport and logisticsSocial infrastructureDigital infrastructure202320242023202420232024202320242023202456%44%58%56%
80、55%43%42%36%36%49%52%84%71%44%27%26%21%21%8%8%15%14%17%18%12%13%22%22%24%4%4%8%8%4027097434631421481381438279324118%20%24%6%6%3%2%2%1%1%32%27%5%6%23%Sources:BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing more than 75%of all infrastructure a
81、ssets under management.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.Most Infrastructure Activity Is Concentrated in Europe andNorth AmericaEXHIBIT 8BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 13EXHIBIT 9Average Deal Size in 2024 Remained R
82、elatively Flat Across Most Sectors and RegionsSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.1Average deal value based on primary assets and direct project investment across all infrastructure investors,where deal value is reported.2Includes Africa,the Middle East,and Latin America and the Caribbean.Energy and environ
83、mentTransport and logistics2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 20242019 2020 2021 2022 2023 202401,0002,0003,000$millions$400 million$800 millionDigital infrastructure Social infrastructure2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024$800 million$1 billionEurope01,0002,0003,000$millions2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024$500 millio
84、nNorth America2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024$900 millionAsia2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024$300 million01,0002,0003,000$millions$900 millionAustralasia2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024$500 millionOther22019 2020 2021 2022 2023 20242019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Average infrastructure deal value by region and
85、 sector,20192024($millions)1Average deal size,20192024($millions)Sources:Preqin;BCG analysis.1Average deal value based on primary assets and direct project investment across all infrastructure investors,where deal value is reported.2Includes Africa,the Middle East,and Latin America and the Caribbean
86、.Average Deal Size in 2024 Remained Relatively Flat Across Most Sectors and RegionsEXHIBIT 9BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 14Despite the slowdown,investors remained active in many key sectors.Our analysis of the years shifts in investment indicates
87、 that investors are looking at a range of new and exciting investment spaces within traditional infrastructure sectorsand increasing activity in some entirely new sectors.(See Exhibit 10.)Energy and Environment The energy and environment sector remains the largest infrastructure asset class,comprisi
88、ng 50%of infrastructure portfolio assets held in 2024 by the top 58 infrastructure investors we analyzed and accounting for the majority of infrastructure deal volume.This category consists of two main segments:energy infrastructure,including power generation,renewables,utilities,storage,and midstre
89、am assets;and environmental infrastructure,including waste management,water utilities,and industrial sustainability solutions.Although these two segments differ in scope,both are shaped by regulatory pressures,emissions reduction targets,and evolving market demands,and as a result they are increasin
90、gly intertwined investment areas.EXHIBIT 10Although Deal Volume Has Slowed Since 2022 Across Sectors,Several Critical Subsectors Have Gained MomentumSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Includes only three sectors:energy and environment,transport and logistics,and digital infrastructure.Social infrastru
91、cture is not included,due to a lack of deals.Includes only primary portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing more than 75%of all infrastructure assets under management.EV=electric vehicle.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.Infrastructu
92、re primary asset investment volume by sector and subsector(number of deals)20197821%24%8%32%15%30%16%14%22%18%50202016%43%12%20%9%76202145%25%8%13%8%83202244%26%9%9%12%812023Wind andsolar power11142366103291Share change(%)20192024 202220241324317252214132Share change(%)20192024 20222024Processing an
93、ddistributionEnvironmentEnergyservicesOtherrenewables50202444%22%14%10%10%3%25%19%53%32201927%18%14%32%9%22202041%24%20%10%5%41 202142%16%22%10%10%50202250%15%6%18%12%342023EVchargingLogisticsRailRoadAir andsea40%20%27%13%15202461640321419417Share change(%)20192024 2022202436%22%14%22%6%36201950%19%
94、3%19%8%36202037%19%16%18%11%57202157%18%14%7%4%56202228%39%9%15%9%462023Other digital infrastructure and servicesMobile data and end user servicesMobile towersData centersFixed broadband40%37%17%7%302024Energy and environmentDigital infrastructureTransport and logisticsSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.No
95、te:Includes only three sectors:energy and environment,transport and logistics,and digital infrastructure.Social infrastructure is not included,due to a lack of deals.Includes only primary portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing more than 75%of all infrastructure as
96、sets under management.EV=electric vehicle.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.Although Deal Volume Has Slowed Since 2022 Across Sectors,Several Critical Subsectors Have Gained MomentumEXHIBIT 10BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS
97、MATURES 15EXHIBIT 11Deal Activity in the Energy and Environment Sector Slowed in 2024,and Renewables Continued to Drive Most InvestmentSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing more than 75%of all infrastructure assets u
98、nder management.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Includes only investments in primary assets,not investments in individual infrastructure projects.2Hydrogen,biomass,low-carbon solutions,and hybrid wind and solar assets.3Includes heating,conventional power,utilities
99、,industrial parks,and other energy services.4Includes investments in waste,water,and environmental services sectors.5Includes assets that Preqin marked as solar or wind;does not include hybrid renewables assets.Environment4Energy services3Processing and distributionOther renewables2Wind and solar po
100、wer5EuropeEnergy and environment primary asset investment volume(number of deals)1North AmericaAsia and Australasia10713149820192020202120222023202429%14%14%29%14%30%31%23%23%8%7%7%71%14%25%50%67%20%3428352319182019202020212022202320249%22%7%6%13%11%53%11%16%11%30%17%22%17%34%20%37%14%11%54%14%28%17
101、%22%11%15%26%47%3%3%342629472017 20192020202120222023202418%21%21%9%32%12%15%14%11%10%35%15%30%10%47%6%30%6%45%7%14%21%12%27%38%8%47%18%6%18%15%13%13%20%22%11%20%10%Sources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing more than 75%
102、of all infrastructure assets under management.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Includes only investments in primary assets,not investments in individual infrastructure projects.2Hydrogen,biomass,low-carbon solutions,and hybrid wind and solar assets.3Includes heatin
103、g,conventional power,utilities,industrial parks,and other energy services.4Includes investments in waste,water,and environmental services sectors.5Includes assets that Preqin marked as solar or wind;does not include hybrid renewables assets.Deal Activity in the Energy and Environment Sector Slowed i
104、n 2024,and Renewables Continued to Drive Most InvestmentEXHIBIT 11Investor interest in energy and the environment remains strong,but deal activity declined by 38%from 2023 to 2024.Most transactions in this segment occurred in North America and Europe,both of which saw a continued focus on expanding
105、energy access in rural and remote regions,from both renewable and nonrenewable sources.(See Exhibit 11.)North Americas deal volume remained relatively flat in 2024,but policy changes may now tip the balance in favor of traditional energy investments.In contrast,Europes continued focus on renewables
106、could create a widening divergence in the two regions,as they take increasingly different approaches to the energy transition and fossil fuel infrastructure.Meanwhile,investment volume in Asia-Pacific remained steady,with a strong focus on wind and solar projects.The future of each of these three ke
107、y investment subsectors will depend on a mix of public and private demand,policy and regulatory changes,and the rise of new energy-related technologies.Traditional EnergyTraditional energy processing and distribution remain critical infrastructure assets,particularly in midstream oil and gas,fuel di
108、stribution,and downstream processing.These assets continue to play a key role in global energy markets,particularly in regions where fossil fuels are still dominant.In the US,recent political rhetoric has emphasized expanding domestic oil and gas production through increased drilling,expedited LNG e
109、xport approvals,and reduced regulatory barriers.Nevertheless,stable oil prices and a global surplus of crude make it unclear how much production will change.Only time will tell whether producers increase capacity in response to these policy efforts.Meanwhile,midstream and downstream investments such
110、 as deepwater oil exports continue to progress.The push for fossil fuel expansion introduces policy-driven volatility,however,as regulatory priorities remain subject to political shifts.To navigate this dynamic environment effectively,infrastructure investors should closely monitor evolving policies
111、 and market responses.BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 16EXHIBIT 12The Energy Sector Is Responsible for 75%of GHG Emissions,Primarily from Industry and BuildingsSources:European Environmental Agency;Edgar 5.0 GHG Inventory;World Resources Institute C
112、AIT database;International Energy Agency;Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN;BCG analysis.Note:CO2e=carbon dioxide equivalent;GHG=greenhouse gas;Gt=gigaton.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.Iron and steel(33%)Petrochemicals(15%)Commercial(38%)Aviation(12%)Roa
113、d transport(73%)Unallocatedfuel combustion(51%)Fugitiveemissions(38%)Rice cultivation(7%)Cropland(8%)Deforestation(12%)Crop burning(19%)Agricultural soil(23%)Livestock andmanure(32%)Shipping(10%)Residentialbuildings(62%)Paper(2%)Others(46%)Energy in industry13.0(24%)9.4(18%)8.7(16%)8.2(15%)2.8(5%)9.
114、9(18%)1.7(3%)Energy for buildingsEnergy in transportsOther energyIndustry Agriculture,forestry,and land useWasteFood(4%)Energy in agricultureand fishing(11%)Other(4%)Cement(58%)Chemicals(42%)Wastewater(41%)Landfill(59%)Total of energy-linked emissions in industry and buildings 22.4 Gt/year(42%)Total
115、 of all energy-linked emissions 40 Gt/year(75%)Total of all GHG emissions:53.8 Gt/yearGHG emissions per year by segment(billions of tons of CO2e per year)Sources:European Environmental Agency;Edgar 5.0 GHG Inventory;World Resources Institute CAIT database;International Energy Agency;Food and Agricul
116、ture Organization of the UN;BCG analysis.Note:CO2e=carbon dioxide equivalent;GHG=greenhouse gas;Gt=gigaton.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.The Energy Sector Is Responsible for 75%of GHG Emissions,Primarily from Industry and BuildingsEXHIBIT 12The Energy Transition
117、With energy production and consumption responsible for 75%of global greenhouse gas emissions,investment in renewables,energy efficiency,and energy storage continues to accelerate.(See Exhibit 12.)Renewables including wind,solar,and other renewable sourcesaccounted for more than 50%of all energy deal
118、s in 2024,with investors concentrating on solar farms and energy storage,and more than a third of portfolio companies were engaged in wind,solar,and other renewable sources.(See Exhibit 13.)Growing demand for battery energy storage systems and alternative energy sources such as renewable natural gas
119、 and sustainable aviation fuel reflects a broader push toward decarbonizing industrial processes and improving grid stability.Investors are addressing this sector with dedicated funds that are increasingly popular among LPs,including TPG Rise,and transition funds from KKR,Brookfield,and EQT.One rece
120、nt deal in this area was BlackRock and ADIAs investment in JSW Energy,which generates power using gas produced from steel plants,demonstrating investor interest in projects that integrate emissions reduction with industrial energy production.Beyond renewables,energy efficiency is becoming an increas
121、ingly important investment focus,particularly in technologies related to district heating,smart grids,and waste heat recovery.At the same time,investors are expanding into CCS projects,which,while still an emerging asset class,are gaining traction due to regulatory incentives and rising corporate ne
122、t-zero commitments.BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 1723%22%30%23%24%34%17%21%31%10%19%35%11%10%13%12%27%36%16%10%Environment4Energy services3Processing and distributionOther renewables2Wind and solar power5Energy and environment portfolio companies
123、by geography and subsector,2024(number of companies)33014%17%25%11%9%27170EuropeNorth America52Australasia81AsiaOther1Sources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing more than 75%of all infrastructure assets under management.B
124、ecause of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Africa,the Middle East,and Latin American and the Caribbean.2Hydrogen,biomass,low-carbon solutions,and hybrid wind and solar assets.3Includes heating,conventional power,utilities,industrial parks,and other energy services.4Includes i
125、nvestments in waste,water,and environmental services sectors.5Includes assets that Preqin marked as solar or wind;does not include hybrid renewables assets.More Than a Third of Companies Active in Energy and Environment Focus on Renewables,and 75%Are Based in Europe and North AmericaEXHIBIT 13EXHIBI
126、T 13More Than a Third of Companies Active in Energy and Environment Focus on Renewables,and 75%Are Based in Europe and North AmericaSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing more than 75%of all infrastructure assets unde
127、r management.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Africa,the Middle East,and Latin American and the Caribbean.2Hydrogen,biomass,low-carbon solutions,and hybrid wind and solar assets.3Includes heating,conventional power,utilities,industrial parks,and other energy servic
128、es.4Includes investments in waste,water,and environmental services sectors.5Includes assets that Preqin marked as solar or wind;does not include hybrid renewables assets.Environmental Alongside the energy transition,investment in environmental infrastructureprimarily waste management and water asset
129、sis gaining momentum,with activity across Europe,North America,Australia,and Asia accounting for most of the environmental deals in 2024.These assets have attractive infrastructure characteristics when assessed on a standalone basis,and they benefit from regulatory and corporate commitments in many
130、geographies.Waste management and water infrastructure offer strong investment opportunities,particularly in light of the tailwinds from global construction and manufacturing activity.Activity is especially strong in developed parts of Asia,such as South Korea,and Australia.Specialized waste manageme
131、nt assetsparticularly those that focus on hazardous waste and liquid waste removalare seeing increased differentiation,making them attractive investment targets.Waste collection,while not a traditional part of infrastructure portfolios,has caught investors interest,especially where linked to long-te
132、rm contracts.Meanwhile,water-related assets are drawing more investor attention as industries such as data centers and semiconductor manufacturing face growing scrutiny over their water-intensive processes.Investors are also targeting opportunities for privatizing water utilities outside the US,wher
133、e regulatory frameworks permit private-sector participation in essential services.Despite the decline in infrastructure deals,total global investment in energy is projected to have exceeded$3 trillion for the first time in 2024,according to the IEA,underscoring the sectors long-term importance.As en
134、ergy demand continues to rise,investment will likely remain bifurcated,with ongoing capital flows into both energy transition assets and fossil fuel infrastructure,shaped by evolving policy,market demand,and emission reduction imperatives.Environmental infrastructure investment is expected to follow
135、 a similar trajectory,driven by tighter regulatory requirements,growing demand for industrial sustainability,and the rising need for waste and water solutions globally.BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 18Transport and Logistics Investments in primary
136、transport and logistics assets have declined substantially since 2022.Activity slowed considerably in 2024 across virtually all of the sectors key investment areas,including over-the-road logistics,warehousing,port operations,bus and rail operators,and EV charging.(See Exhibit 14.)Europe and North A
137、merica currently control around 65%of privately held transportation and logistics assets.(See Exhibit 15.)Among the top 58 investment firms,however,investments in the sector are down 44%globally.Europe and North America have seen a disproportionate slowdown in deal volume,too,with both down approxim
138、ately 40%.And no transport-sector-specific fund raised any new capital through the first half of 2024.As is the case with other sectors,the decline in this sectors volume reflects the same range of economic headwinds noted above.However,it is also uniquely affected by the softer traffic and lower fr
139、eight volume and prices that have prevailed since 2022,particularly in the US,limiting the near-term attractiveness of these assets given the dynamics of freight cycles.Traffic,freight volume,and rates have since stabilized,but uncertainty regarding the timing and scope of tariffs in North America m
140、ay impact transportation and logistics going forward,depending on their exposure to specific commodities and trade lanes.Several themes and specific opportunities have emerged across five key subsectors.EXHIBIT 14Investments in Transportation Have Declined Globally Since 2022,with Sectors Exposed to
141、 Freight Costs Hit the HardestSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing more than 75%of all infrastructure assets under management.EV=electric vehicle.1Includes only investment in primary assets;does not include investme
142、nts in individual infrastructure projects.2Includes air and ship leasing,airports,and ports/terminals.3Includes route-based services.EuropeNorth AmericaAsia and AustralasiaTransport and logistics primary asset investment volume(number of deals)1LogisticsEV chargingAir and sea2Rail3Road21%11%63%5%8%1
143、7%42%25%17%29%42%8%14%32%29%18%7%5%11%58%45%18%27%57%43%14%43%43%14%43%22%57%25%11%11%56%43%75%33%14%43%14%29%17%50%67%33%100%33%67%29%21%5%9%14%20192020202120222023202420192020202120222023202420192020202120222023202419128%4%002428191177797437Data notavailable643Sources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Incl
144、udes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing more than 75%of all infrastructure assets under management.EV=electric vehicle.1Includes only investment in primary assets;does not include investments in individual infrastructure projects.2Includes air and ship le
145、asing,airports,and ports/terminals.3Includes route-based services.Investments in Transportation Have Declined Globally Since 2022,with Sectors Exposed to Freight Costs Hit the HardestEXHIBIT 14BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 19EXHIBIT 15Two-Thirds o
146、f Privately Held Transport and Logistics Assets Are in Europe and North AmericaSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing 75%or more of all infrastructure assets under management.EV=electric vehicle.Because of rounding,no
147、t all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Africa,the Middle East,and Latin American and the Caribbean.2Including air and ship leasing,airports,and ports and terminals.3ncludes route-based services.LogisticsEV chargingAir and sea2Rail3Road2%9%27%23%58%15%49%7%8%8%13%62%15%16%45%20%19%34%30%29%3%3
148、%4%Transport and logistics portfolio companies by geography and subsector,2024(number of companies)North AmericaAsiaAustralasiaEuropeOther119667266031Sources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing 75%or more of all infrastruc
149、ture assets under management.EV=electric vehicle.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Africa,the Middle East,and Latin American and the Caribbean.2Including air and ship leasing,airports,and ports and terminals.3Includes route-based services.Two-Thirds of Privately Hel
150、d Transport and Logistics Assets Are in Europe and North AmericaEXHIBIT 15Air and SeaActivity in seaports has continued,especially in Europe and Asia,where operations have historically been privatized,but the prospect of US tariffs may have some adverse downstream effects on volume at ports in both
151、regions.Although it is beginning to subside,the Red Sea crisis has created lasting uncertainties around global trade routes,indirectly affecting infrastructure investments.Meanwhile,investment risks in the maritime sector have increased,driven by concerns over inflation,the restructuring of alliance
152、 among global shipping lines,and shifting service patterns.Some port assets continue to come to market,but investor sentiment remains mixed,as many investors take a wait-and-see approach.Given these factors,investors are increasingly favoring minority stakes or joint ventures in major port assets,su
153、ch as Sohar Marine Port,as a way to enhance revenue visibility and reduce risk exposure.Ports,in particular,often present attractive joint venture opportunities with private shipping companies,benefiting investors through stable returns and operators through preferred rates.In the airport subsector,
154、airline schedule volatility,weaker passenger revenue,and growing scrutiny into aviations carbon footprint(around 5%of global emissions)post-COVID-19 have made airports a more challenging investment.Still,investor interest remains relatively strong.While large new airport deals remain rare,passenger
155、volume is reaching pre-pandemic levels,and some COVID-19-delayed transactions have closed.A lot of investment activity is concentrated on ownership stake rotations in major hubs,such as Londons Heathrow and Gatwick airports,as well as adjacent businesses like ground services,rather than on new acqui
156、sitions.Global Infrastructure Partners and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority recently partnered with Malaysias sovereign wealth fund to privatize the Kuala Lumpur International Airport,for example.BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 20Beyond airports,i
157、nterest is increasing across the aviation landscape,including in ground support equipment,MRO(maintenance,repair,and overhaul),cargo handling,and aircraft leasing.In particular,leasing has grown rapidly and now accounts for just over half of the global aircraft fleet.Recent deals in key segments inc
158、lude Stonepeaks take-private of Air Transport Services Group for$3.1 billion,and the sale by Chorus Aviation(previously owned by Brookfield)of Falko Regional Aircraft Limited to HPS Investment Partners for$1.9 billion.Falko followed with an additional acquisition of a portfolio of 25 regional jets f
159、rom Nordic Aviation Capital to form a leading global aircraft lessor focused on smaller regional aircraft,with over 200 planes in total.We expect further growth and consolidation in aircraft leasing to continue in 2025.Road Despite higher freight costs and an overall slowdown in road-related assets,
160、some opportunities remain.In developed economies,investors continue to target high-cash-flow road assets such as parking structures.In developing economies,toll roads and highway infrastructure remain attractive,particularly in Latin America and Southeast Asia,as ongoing privatization efforts create
161、 new deal flow.Europe,too,has seen some recent deals,such as I Squared Capitals acquisition of Arriva Group,a major provider of bus transport.EV Charging EV charging deal activity remains low,as EV adoption has been slower than projected,reducing the pace of infrastructure expansion,particularly in
162、the US.Softening policy support for EVs in the US will further delay the expected timetable for widespread adoption,affecting investments in charging infrastructure and efforts toward fleet electrification.One factor that could help unlock transaction activity is the emergence of new financing struc
163、tures to address current investment challenges.EV charging networks require significant upfront capital,yet utilization rates remain low,which makes traditional funding models less viable.If more innovative financing solutions see wider adoption,they could help utilities,oil and gas companies,and ot
164、her EV investors scale EV infrastructure while attracting more private capital into the space.These developments remain to be seen,however,and momentum heading into 2025 remains limited.Logistics and Warehousing Logistics deal activity has been focusing more and more on specialty assets,including co
165、ld-chain storage and specialty fuel storage,rather than on traditional logistics investments.Investor demand remains strong for contract logistics and warehousing,with higher pricing power for infrastructure players.In line with this,EQT recently acquired Constellation,a European cold storage networ
166、k,reflecting growing interest in specialty logistics and assets that focus on specific commodities or trade lanes in 2025.We expect the emphasis on specialty logistics and commodity-focused assets to persist in 2025,particularly as supply chain fragmentation and nearshoring trends drive demand for l
167、ocalized,high-value logistics solutions.Beyond traditional logistics assets,investors show increasing interest in leasing markets,including trailers,containers,and cranes,where demand for flexible logistics solutions continues to grow.These assets offer strong pricing power and predictable cash flow
168、s,making them resilient even in volatile freight cycles.Digital Infrastructure Digital infrastructureincluding fixed and mobile networks,fiber rollouts,mobile towers,data centers,subsea cables,and satellitesremains a key focus for infrastructure investors.As with other asset classes,however,investme
169、nt activity in 2024 is far below its peak in 2022.Investors in Europe and North America,which hold most digital portfolio assets,saw a disproportionate decline in primary asset deals,with Europe down 52%and North America down 24%year-over-year.(See Exhibits 16 and 17.)High valuations weighed on tran
170、sactions,limiting large-scale M&A and consolidation activity in the areas of fixed broadband,data centers,and mobile towers.Nevertheless,ongoing structural shifts in telecom and fiber markets,together with the expansion of AI-driven demand for new data centers and related energy security considerati
171、ons,will continue to drive investor interest heading into 2025.Investment interest is particularly strong in the digital subsectors of fixed broadband,data centers,and mobile towers.In addition,two emerging themes are likely to help shape the 2025 digital infrastructure investing environment:market
172、restructuring and investments in resiliency.Fixed BroadbandFiber and fixed broadband infrastructure remained a hive of investment activity,particularly for assets expanding rural broadband access and those leveraging PPPs.The trend among telecom companies to carve out their networking operations fro
173、m their customer service activities and sell them off as separate companies has gained further traction,especially in mature markets where fiber relayering and buybacks are driving restructuring efforts.Retailer involvement in fiber infrastructure is increasing,too,as some companies seek to secure l
174、ong-term supply through investments in networking companies.This trend signals a broader transformation in fiber strategies,where securing reliable,high-capacity infrastructure is now a priority beyond traditional telecom players.BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET C
175、LASS MATURES 21EXHIBIT 17Interest in Data Centers Is Growing Globally,but Most Digital Infrastructure Assets Are Still in Europe and North AmericaSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing 75%or more of all infrastructure
176、 assets under management.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Africa,the Middle East,and Latin American and the Caribbean.Digital infrastructure portfolio companies by geography and subsector,2024(number of companies)EuropeNorth AmericaOther1159104Asia3517Australasia56
177、%11%8%29%31%9%18%41%6%16%9%18%26%6%18%26%9%23%37%6%32%26%16%26%19Fixed broadbandMobile data and end user servicesMobile towersData centersOther data infrastructure and servicesSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing 75
178、%or more of all infrastructure assets under management.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Africa,the Middle East,and Latin American and the Caribbean.Interest in Data Centers Is Growing Globally,but Most Digital Infrastructure Assets Are Still in Europe and North Ame
179、ricaEXHIBIT 17EXHIBIT 16Deal Activity in Digital Infrastructure Has Softened,but Interest in Fixed Broadband and Mobile Towers Remains Strong in Europe and AsiaSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing more than 75%of al
180、l infrastructure assets under management.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Includes only investment in primary assets;does not include investment in individual infrastructure projects.Digital infrastructure primary asset investment volume(number of deals)1EuropeNort
181、h AmericaAsia and Australasia201976%12%12%202048%13%4%22%13%202120%5%5%10%60%202222%9%9%48%13%202345%18%36%202420172329231179%10%3%7%20192020202120222023202411131918171327%23%8%32%21%11%44%11%29%24%12%29%38%46%45%18%38%8%23%26%39%6%11%6%15%2019202020212022202350%25%25%50%50%20%10%60%29%29%43%50%25%1
182、7%33%50%20244410746Fixed broadbandMobile data and end user servicesMobile towersData centersOther data infrastructure and services9%10%25%Sources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:Includes only portfolio investments made by 58 key infrastructure investors,representing more than 75%of all infrastructure asset
183、s under management.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Includes only investment in primary assets;does not include investment in individual infrastructure projects.Deal Activity in Digital Infrastructure Has Softened,but Interest in Fixed Broadband and Transmission To
184、wers Remains Strong in Europe and AsiaEXHIBIT 16BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 22Data CentersInvestor activity in data centers remained strong in 2024,driven by growing AI adoption and the increasing need for scalable computing infrastructure.Altho
185、ugh demand for hyperscale and co-location facilities remains high,energy security has become a central challenge for operators,as AI workloads significantly increase power consumption.Ensuring reliable,cost-effective power access has become a priority,as operators consider onsite generation,investme
186、nts in nuclear power plants,and proximity to stable energy sources.Sustainability concerns persist,but the immediate investor focus is on securing energy supplies rather than pursuing long-term green initiatives.(See the sidebar,“The Data Center Boom.”)Telecom Mobile TowersWith most large-scale tele
187、com tower M&A activity completed,investors have shifted their focus from new acquisitions of tower companies to operational efficiencies and asset performance.Improving tenancy ratios remains a priority,with operators working to maximize site utilization and optimize revenue per tower.In addition,so
188、me tower companies are investigating the possibility of sharing active equipment.Digitization of tower operations has gained momentum as well,with investors deploying predictive maintenance,AI-powered forecasting models,and digital twins to improve operational efficiency.As telecom towers shift clos
189、er to a real estate investment modelthrough,among other things,land lease acquisitionsinvestors are placing greater emphasis on automation and asset performance optimization.Investors have also pursued take-private deals of underperforming regional tower units,particularly in Europe and Asia,where s
190、ome telcos have divested loss-making business units.These transactions reflect growing opportunities in value-added strategies,where investors can enhance asset performance through operational improvements rather than outright expansion.Market RestructuringMature digital markets are undergoing signi
191、ficant restructuring,creating opportunities for investors through geographic and value chain consolidation.In markets such as the UK and Spain,investors are leveraging consolidation trends to optimize assets and expand market share.Meanwhile,the trend for telcos to carve out their networking operati
192、ons is driving a realignment of fiber and broadband investments.At the same time,many smaller digital infrastructure players are struggling to remain competitive,accelerating M&A activity as investors seek opportunities to acquire and consolidate underperforming assets in an evolving competitive lan
193、dscape.Resilience InvestmentsAs governments prioritize network reliability and security and data sovereignty,digital infrastructure investors are increasingly factoring resilience into their investment strategies.Cybersecurity risks,weather-related disruptions,and capacity constraints are driving a
194、shift toward redundancy-focused investments and infrastructure-hardening efforts.The 2024 Valencia floods,which temporarily disrupted emergency communication networks,underscored the risks associated with insufficiently resilient digital infrastructure,reinforcing the case for fail-safe networks and
195、 built-in redundancy.As digital infrastructure plays a more critical role in global economies,governments are demonstrating greater willingness to pay for reliability,which could influence investment frameworks in 2025 and beyond.Although deal flow slowed in 2024,the long-term investment outlook for
196、 digital infrastructure remains strong,with AI-driven computing demand,high-speed broadband expansion,and telecom network resilience continuing to be key investment themes.Market restructuring,networking carve-outs,energy security,and cybersecurity risks will shape investment strategies going forwar
197、d,as investors focus on expansion and infrastructure stability.BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 23The Data Center BoomInvestor interest in data centers has surged,fueled by unprecedented demand associated with AI and cloud computing.In a sign of grow
198、ing private-sector involvement,2024 saw the largest-ever data center transaction,with Blackstone and CPP acquiring AirTrunk,a network of hyperscale data centers in Asia-Pacific,for$16 billion from Macquarie Asset Management.Total investment in the sector reached$49.7 billion in 2024,up from just$10.
199、8 billion in 2020,and average deal size grew by 22%annually over the past four years.(See the exhibit.)However,while data center investments are scaling rapidly,concerns about energy security,sustainability,potential overcapacity,and valuations are beginning to emerge.Much of the data center momentu
200、m has been driven by the explosive rise of AI-related computing demand,with cloud giants such as Amazon,Google,and Microsoft spending unprecedented sums on hyperscale data centers.Hyperscalers,which historically built much of their infrastructure in-house,are now increasingly turning to leasing,crea
201、ting major opportunities for private investors.At the same time,large-scale AI deployments are accelerating demand for co-location facilities,heightening the need for private capital to fund development.More than 80%of the data center investments made by top firms in 2024 have been in hyperscale ass
202、ets,as investors seek exposure to high-demand,long-term lease structures backed by major tech firms.Recognizing the capital-intensive nature of the sector,investors are increasingly turning to joint ventures and co-investments to scale their exposure.In addition to the Blackstone and CPP deal,variou
203、s companies have formed partnerships to expand their presence in the space,including Silver Lake and DigitalBridge;Stonepeak and ATC;and Equinix,GIC,and CPP.This shift reflects a growing recognition that private capital is essential to meeting surging demand,as hyperscalers cannot build everything o
204、n their own.Investment in Data Centers Hit a New High in 2024 and Will Continue to Be a Key Theme for Investors in 2025 and BeyondSources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:The data in this exhibit covers four types of data centers:enterprise data centers(data centers owned and operated by a single organizati
205、on for internal use);edge data centers(data centers located as close to end users as possible);co-location data centers(large data centers with multiple smaller tenants);and hyperscale data centers(large data centers with one or more large anchor tenants).1Total investment in data center assets incl
206、udes deal values from greenfield,brownfield,and primary asset deals across all infrastructure investors,where deal value is reported.42%of deals had a reported value in 2020;39%in 2021;32%in 2022;38%in 2023;and 45%in 2024.Total capital deployed on data centers,20202024($billions)1 Data center averag
207、e deal size,20202024($millions)1 202020212022202320242020202120222023202410.836.422.321.549.7225616371352492+46%+22%Sources:Preqin;BCG analysis.Note:The data in this exhibit covers four types of data centers:enterprise data centers(data centers owned and operated by a single organization for interna
208、l use);edge data centers(data centers located as close to end users as possible);co-location data centers(large data centers with multiple smaller tenants);and hyperscale data centers(large data centers with one or more large anchor tenants).1Total investment in data center assets includes deal valu
209、es from greenfield,brownfield,and primary asset deals across all infrastructure investors,where deal value is reported.42%of deals had a reported value in 2020;39%in 2021;32%in 2022;38%in 2023;and 45%in 2024.Investment in Data Centers Hit a New High in 2024 and Will Continue to Be a Key Theme for In
210、vestors in 2025 and BeyondBOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 24Yet this rapid expansion is not without risks.Long lead times for development mean that supply-demand imbalances could emerge,particularly if demand projections prove overly optimistic.Some
211、 investors have begun raising concerns that if hyperscale demand slows,pricing pressure could weigh on valuations,creating a more challenging investment landscape.Capacity levels have been constrained in recent years,but there are signs that this trend may begin to reverse as new capacity comes onli
212、ne.Beyond expansion,the industry faces another challenge:the immense energy and resource consumption of data centers.With power demands escalating,companies are actively seeking new energy solutions to ensure long-term sustainability.In the US,Microsoft has begun investing in nuclear power to secure
213、 dedicated energy supply for its data centers.Meanwhile,in Europe,some operators are integrating their facilities into district heating systems,repurposing excess heat to warm local communities.At the same time,water consumption is receiving increased scrutiny,prompting investment in low-and no-wate
214、r cooling technologies to reduce environmental impact.These trends suggest that although AI-driven demand continues to encourage investment,the long-term viability of data centers will depend in part on their energy efficiency and regulatory adaptability.Aside from their interest in new builds,inves
215、tors are exploring opportunities to repurpose existing infrastructure to support growth.Former factories and warehouses are being converted into data centers,leveraging existing power and fiber connectivity to minimize development costs and accelerate deployment timelines.Demand for supporting infra
216、structure and services is expanding,too,with investors eyeing opportunities in fiber connectivity,third-party maintenance,and specialty data center services.Although they are not traditional infrastructure assets,these services are critical to the operation of data centers and are typically retained
217、 for long periods,making them attractive investment opportunities that offer stable,long-term revenue streams.Data centers remain one of the most attractive infrastructure investment opportunities,as the surge in AI-driven demand has driven record-breaking growth,but the market is approaching an inf
218、lection point.Going forward,balancing capacity expansion,energy sustainability,and long-term investment returns will be essential to ensuring the subsectors continued stability.BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 25Social Infrastructure As in years past
219、,of the four key infrastructure sectors,social infrastructure saw the lowest level of activity among the 58 key infrastructure investors in 2024.This specific group of top investors signed just four major transactionsall in Europein 2024,down from five in 2023.Beyond this group of investors,however,
220、investment in social infrastructure continues among a wide range of private capital sources,particularly in health care and education.Health care infrastructure is an especially lively focus of private investment,particularly in ambulatory and outpatient care,where smaller-scale transactions often a
221、ttract interest from non-infrastructure specialist funds.At the same time,larger multiunit health care investments remain viable,most notably in Europe and North America,where aging populations are driving demand for retirement homes and hospital infrastructure.In Europe,demographic shifts are rapid
222、ly outpacing the availability of elderly care facilities,creating a structural funding gap that private capital could help address.However,increased public-sector scrutiny of private health care investment is reshaping the risk profile of these assets,particularly in the case of facilities that rely
223、 heavily on government reimbursements.Education infrastructure has seen continued interest,particularly in the K-12 sector.Much of the higher education investment activity has been concentrated in Europe and is emerging as a potential growth area in markets such as the Middle East.Beyond health care
224、 and education,the leisure sector is beginning to show signs of renewed transaction activity.That sector has been relatively inactive in recent years,following COVID-19-related volatility and the post-pandemic peak in travel and hospitality demand.As market conditions normalize,however,more exits ar
225、e expected,with investors looking to recycle capital from pandemic-era investments.New investment in leisure assets remains limited among the 58 key infrastructure investors,but the sector is likely to generate secondary transactions as owners seek to monetize stabilized assets.Looking ahead,we expe
226、ct health care and education to continue to drive social infrastructure investment,with deal flow among the 58 key investors remaining smaller than for other infrastructure asset classes.The potential for public-private partnerships remains strongest in health care,although scrutiny by governments o
227、f their health care budgets could temper the pace of investment in certain markets.Aging populations in Europe are expected to drive long-term demand for elderly care facilities and hospitals,but education infrastructureparticularly in connection with K-12 schoolsis an emerging area of interest.Cruc
228、ially,investment in social infrastructure extends well beyond the 58 key investors analyzed here,and broader private capital flows will continue to shape the sectors growth.BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 26Over the past two decades,the infrastructu
229、re asset class has firmly established itself as an indispensable part of capital allocations.As it has matured,and in light of recent challenges in the fundraising environment,GPs are expanding their mandates to create differentiated avenues for their LPs commitments.In parallel,they are focusing ev
230、en more deliberately on their operational approaches to sustain investment performance.This evolution is reflected in three core trends shaping the private infrastructure space:An expanded investment mandate to increase scale,partly through M&A-driven consolidation Increased focus on innovative ways
231、 to attract new capital Concerted efforts to boost portfolio value creation through operational excellence Evolving Strategies In addition to growing AuM by increasing allocations from existing LPs and by attracting new LPs into established strategies,infrastructure GPs are actively expanding their
232、mandates to capture a larger share of investors that seek greater and more differentiated exposure in three key areas:risk-return profiles,sectors,and geographies.By doing so,they can accomplish two goals.The first is to establish themselves either as a“one-stop shop”for infrastructure investments a
233、cross the entire asset class or as a niche specialist in areas such as digital infrastructure to create differentiated investment opportunities.The second is to fully leverage their investment platforms,from fundraising and deal sourcing to operational expertise,to grow AuM and create synergies acro
234、ss strategies,including efforts to gain earlier exposure to high-growth companies and emerging technologies.This rationale is driving consolidation among GPs,too,as M&A has become a key tool to reinforce both broad-based and specialist strategies,helping some GPs scale into one-stop-shops and enabli
235、ng others to strengthen their niche,geographic,or sector focus.The Expanding Infrastructure Mandate BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 27Increased Risk AppetiteIn their search for return profiles that exceed those of traditional core assets,GPs have be
236、en moving up the risk curve,launching various core-plus,value-added,and opportunistic funds.On an absolute basis,core-plus funds have attracted the most investment in recent years.In 2023,58%of all funds raised by the 58 largest infrastructure investors were in the core-plus segment,up from 11%five
237、years earlier.(See Exhibit 18.)Value-added funds,too,have grown in popularity,although fund-raising for these funds has fluctuated more on an annual basis.A common feature of value-added funds is the continuous expansion of the definition of infrastructure to include next-generation infrastructure.I
238、ncreasingly,these funds invest in infrastructure-related services,such as testing,inspection,and certification services;software supporting infrastructure operations;and contract manufacturing.Rather than strictly adhering to traditional infrastructure characteristicssuch as contracted revenues,asse
239、t intensity,and inflation protectionvalue-added funds demonstrate greater flexibility,targeting assets that are a step removed from core infrastructure.Next-generation infrastructure also includes businesses that provide critical services to traditional infrastructure sectors,such as utility service
240、 providers and digital infrastructure enablers.EXHIBIT 18GPs Are Moving Up the Risk Curve,Allocating More Dollars to Core-Plus Funds Since 2014 Sources:Infralogic;Preqin;Pitchbook;infrastructure investors;BCG analysis.Note:AuM=assets under management;GP=general partner.Because of rounding,not all ba
241、r segment percentages add up to 100%.1Year fund was launched to start raising;top 20 GPs by infrastructure AuM of the 58 largest infrastructure investors.2Data for 20142024 is shown as funds raised since launch.Annual closed-end funds raised by fund launchyear by investment strategy for top 20 GPsby
242、 infrastructure AuM,201420241Annual closed-end funds launched by fund launchyear by investment strategy for top 20 GPsby infrastructure AuM,201420241Funds raised($billions)2 Number of funds launched 80%6%201421%68%11%201546%1%42%11%201627%9%64%201753%11%35%1%201816%49%28%7%201925%7%68%202033%43%19%5
243、%2021Launch yearMany funds launchedin 2023 and 2024are still raising fundsLaunch year24%45%31%202222%58%12%8%202386%15%12%2024254021452%666571123125436654%15%201427%45%27%201533%17%33%17%201650%10%40%201739%17%33%11%201829%29%18%24%201925%17%58%202025%30%30%15%202150%25%25%202231%50%6%13%202363%31%2
244、5%2024131161013%1712202016818CoreCore-plusValue-addedOpportunisticSources:Infralogic;Preqin;Pitchbook;infrastructure investors;BCG analysis.Note:AuM=assets under management;GP=general partner.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Year fund was launched to start raising;
245、top 20 GPs by infrastructure AuM of the 58 largest infrastructure investors.2Data for 20142024 is shown as funds raised since launch.GPs Are Moving Up the Risk Curve,Allocating More Dollars to Core-Plus Funds Since 2014 EXHIBIT 18BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET C
246、LASS MATURES 28More Sector-Specific FundsGPs are launching new sector-specific funds to tap into more thematic and localized opportunities as well.This activity comes in response to increased demand from LPs for dedicated products,especially in the energy,digital,and transport sectors,and for new fu
247、nd products such as infrastructure technology.In 2023,generalist funds accounted for most of the AuM in newly launched funds.But funds focused on the energy sector in particularincluding those with climate,energy transition,and renewables mandatesproved popular,too,accounting for 43%of all funds lau
248、nched in 2023,up from 36%in 2021 and just 11%in 2022.(See Exhibit 19.)And GPs have launched various funds since 2018 that focus on digital assets,although the precise number has fluctuated from year to year.A further reason for GPs increased interest in sector funds is to gain more exposure to emerg
249、ing technologies,and to leverage their existing sector expertise and relationships in the M&A ecosystem.Deeper Geographic FocusRecently we have seen diversification in sector exposure among many new funds,but there has been little change in their geographic focus.In the past several years,multiconti
250、nental funds accounted for more than 70%of all dollars raised and 50%or more of new funds launched.(See Exhibit 20.)Still,interest in funds with a specific focus on Asia-Pacific has grown,indicating a burgeoning desire among investors to expand beyond the traditional European and North American mark
251、ets.Relevant offerings include Stonepeaks Asia Infrastructure Fund,KKRs Asian Infrastructure Fund II,and Macquaries Asia-Pacific Infrastructure Fund 3.EXHIBIT 19Funds Focused on Energy Have Attracted the Most Capital Among Sector-Focused Funds Since 2014Sources:Infralogic;Preqin;Pitchbook;infrastruc
252、ture investors;BCG analysis.Note:AuM=assets under management;GP=general partner.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Year fund was launched to start raising;top 20 GPs by infrastructure AuM of the 58 largest infrastructure investors.2Data for 20142024 is shown as funds
253、 raised since launch.3Includes transition and renewables funds.Annual closed-end funds raised by fund launchyear for top 20 GPs by infrastructure AuM1Annual closed-end funds launched by fund launchyear for top 20 GPs by infrastructure AuM1Funds raised($billions)2 Number of funds launched Many funds
254、launchedin 2023 and 2024are still raising fundsLaunch yearLaunch yearGeneralEnergy3DigitalTransport19%2%201481%19%201599%1%201658%33%9%201778%15%6%201875%20%2%3%201971%14%16%202057%36%7%202180%11%7%3%202256%43%2%202331%69%79%254021456620246571123125436638%8%201455%45%201583%17%201650%40%10%201767%28
255、%6%201853%35%6%6%201950%17%33%202045%35%20%202150%30%5%15%202244%44%13%202375%54%13%2024131161013%1712202016818Sources:Infralogic;Preqin;Pitchbook;infrastructure investors;BCG analysis.Note:AuM=assets under management;GP=general partner.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 1
256、00%.1Year fund was launched to start raising;top 20 GPs by infrastructure AuM of the 58 largest infrastructure investors.2Data for 20142024 is shown as funds raised since launch.3Includes transition and renewables funds.Funds Focused on Energy Have Attracted the Most Capital Among Sector-Focused Fun
257、ds Since 2014EXHIBIT 19BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 29EXHIBIT 20Multicontinental Funds Account for Most of the Capital Raised Since 2014,but Asia-Pacific-Focused Funds Are Gaining InterestSources:Infralogic;Preqin;Pitchbook;infrastructure investo
258、rs;BCG analysis.Note:AuM=assets under management;GP=general partner.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Year fund was launched to start raising;top 20 GPs by infrastructure AuM of the 58 largest infrastructure investors.2Data for 20142024 is shown as funds raised sinc
259、e launch.3Asia-Pacific comprises four regions:East Asia,Southeast Asia,South Asia,and Oceania.Annual closed-end funds raised by fund launchyear for top 20 GPs by Infrastructure AuM1Annual closed-end funds launched by fund launchyear for top 20 GPs by Infrastructure AuM1Funds raised($billions)2 Numbe
260、r of funds launched 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 20242014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024254021456666657112312543131161018171220201681%6%6%13%MulticontinentalNorth AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific3Middle EastLatin America69%61%42%68%80%81%82%74%80%92%95%46%27%33%60%56
261、%59%67%60%55%69%50%3%2125%17%6%12%7%10%3%8%27%17%20%6%6%25%20%15%13%13%17%1822%11%11%6%14%6%2%31%36%33%10%11%24%8%10%15%13%25%11%1%7%2%1%7%5%9%15%9%17%10%22%12%10%15%11%7%2%1%1%Many fundslaunched in 2023and 2024 arestill raising fundsLaunch yearLaunch yearSources:Infralogic;Preqin;Pitchbook;infrastr
262、ucture investors;BCG analysis.Note:AuM=assets under management;GP=general partner.Because of rounding,not all bar segment percentages add up to 100%.1Year fund was launched to start raising;top 20 GPs by infrastructure AuM of the 58 largest infrastructure investors.2Data for 20142024 is shown as fun
263、ds raised since launch.3Asia-Pacific comprises four regions:East Asia,Southeast Asia,South Asia,and Oceania.Multicontinental Funds Account for Most of the Capital Raised Since 2014,but Asia-Pacific-Focused Funds Are Gaining InterestEXHIBIT 20Gaining Scale Through Acquisitions One major trend that bo
264、th drives the maturation of the infrastructure asset class and reflects its changing mandate is GPs increasing use of M&A to acquire infrastructure specialist funds.Many multiasset managers that havent previously offered infrastructure to their LPs are entering the infrastructure sector by acquiring
265、 specialist firms.In the past 12 years,44 infrastructure specialist firms have been acquired by other GPs,and more and more of these acquisitions are being carried out by firms that had no prior infrastructure investing capabilities.(See Exhibit 21.)Examples include CVCs acquisition of DIF,General A
266、tlantics acquisition of Actis,and Bridgepoints acquisition of Energy Capital Partners.Entering this appealing and still fast-growing asset class provides acquiring GPs with a hedging portfolio,while also enabling them to attractively de-risk their overall portfolios and gain scale.BOSTON CONSULTING
267、GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 30Meanwhile,established infrastructure investors are further consolidating their positions,as evidenced by BlackRocks$12.5 billion acquisition of Global Infrastructure Partners in 2024,Apollos purchase of Argo Infrastructure Partners i
268、n 2025,and others.(See Exhibit 22.)These moves allow GPs to diversify their offerings,increase operational scale,enhance their portfolio capabilities,and expand their infrastructure AuM.For these players,the resulting growth and consolidation allow them to reinforce their leadership as infrastructur
269、e investors.Innovative Fundraising Confronted with the fundraising challenges of the past several years,GPs are devising and carrying out new strategies to expand the funding base and attract new LP dollars.These include expanding their geographic presence,offering attractive co-investment structure
270、s,and providing opportunities to retail investors.New Geographies for New LPs Expanding their presence outside their traditional markets enables GPs to build stronger relationships with institutional investors in new markets.By establishing a local presence,infrastructure funds can engage directly w
271、ith LPs,better understand their preferences,and provide tailored opportunities that align with regional market dynamics.EXHIBIT 21GPs Are Increasingly Acquiring Infrastructure Specialists,Reflecting the Growing Consolidation and Importance of the Infrastructure Asset ClassSources:Infralogic;Preqin;P
272、itchbook;infrastructure investors;BCG analysis.Note:Analysis run on 78 firm M&A transactions in which the acquiring or acquired firm has infrastructure focused investments.GP=general partner.1Real estate and infrastructure specialists invest broadly in real assets.2General asset managers with infras
273、tructure assets under management.M&A activity of GP firms with infrastructure exposure,20132024(number of acquired firms)200220062007201220132018Number of acquired firmsInfrastructure specialist26152920192024General asset manager2 23311Real estate and infrastructure specialist10281220132015201420172
274、016201820192020202120222023202422664224225113522163219612944111713212572312Acquired company typeSources:Infralogic;Preqin;Pitchbook;infrastructure investors;BCG analysis.Note:Analysis run on 78 firm M&A transactions in which the acquiring or acquired firm has infrastructure focused investments.GP=ge
275、neral partner.1Real estate and infrastructure specialists invest broadly in real assets.2General asset managers with infrastructure assets under management.GPs Are Increasingly Acquiring Infrastructure Specialists,Reflecting the Growing Consolidation and Importance of the Infrastructure Asset ClassE
276、XHIBIT 21BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 31EXHIBIT 22Example M&A Deals Across the Private Infrastructure SpaceSources:Infralogic;Preqin;Pitchbook;infrastructure investors;BCG analysis.Note:Analysis run on 78 firm M&A transactions in which the acquir
277、ing or acquired firm has infrastructure focused investments.ESG=environmental,social,and governance;GP=general partner;LP=limited partner.1General asset managers with infrastructure assets under management.2Real estate and infrastructure specialists invest broadly in real assets.Select M&A activity
278、among GP firms with infrastructure exposure AcquirerAcquisitionAcquisition typeYearPress release excerpts on rationaleAmundiAlphaAssociatesGeneral asset manager12024“This acquisition will position Amundi as a leading Europeanplayer in this space.with an enhanced multi-manageroffering spanning across
279、 private debt,infrastructure,private equity and venture capital,and an enlarged client and geographical footprint.”BlackRockGlobalInfrastructurePartnersInfrastructure specialist2024Infrastructure represents a generational investment opportunity.Through the combination of BlackRock and GIP,we are wel
280、l positioned to capitalize on the long-term structural trends that will continue to drive the growth of infrastructure.”BridgepointGroupEnergy CapitalPartnersInfrastructure specialist2024“Our platforms are complementary,as are our geographicfootprints,and at a critical time for energy security and t
281、heglobal energy transition.”CommerzbankAquila CapitalInfrastructure specialist2024“With the transaction,Commerzbank accelerates its growthin the sustainability business.”EnTrustGlobalOMP CapitalInfrastructure specialist2024“This transaction will enable EnTrusts Blue Ocean team toexpand its presence
282、in the maritime and energy industry,whiletapping into key talent in Oslo,Norway.”GeneralAtlanticActisInfrastructure specialist2024“Actis will operate as General Atlantics SustainableInfrastructure business alongside its existing strategies inGrowth Equity,Credit,and Climate.”PatriaInvestmentsNexus C
283、apitalPartnersReal estate andinfrastructure specialist22024“Nexus has a robust portfolio within the Colombian Real Estatemarket.it will be a great addition to our real estate platform,contributing to our growth goals and strengthening ourrelationships with investors in Colombia and the region.”Vinci
284、PartnersMAV CapitalReal estate andinfrastructure specialist22024“Strengthening our presence in agribusiness,this transactionaligns with our long-term goals of expanding business lines andbuilding leading franchises.AlquityVAM FundsGeneral asset manager12023“The company aims to shake up the internati
285、onal advisorymarket ESG offering,tapping into the increasing global demand or sustainable investment strategies.”CVC CapitalPartnersDIFReal estate andinfrastructure specialist22022“This strategic acquisition provides CVC with a leadinginfrastructure platform,adjacent and highly complementary toits e
286、xisting private equity,secondary&credit strategies.”Sources:Infralogic;Preqin;Pitchbook;infrastructure investors;BCG analysis.Note:Analysis run on 78 firm M&A transactions in which the acquiring or acquired firm has infrastructure focused investments.ESG=environmental,social,and governance;GP=genera
287、l partner;LP=limited partner.1General asset managers with infrastructure assets under management.2Real estate and infrastructure specialists invest broadly in real assets.Example M&A Deals Across the Private Infrastructure SpaceEXHIBIT 22BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE
288、 ASSET CLASS MATURES 32This approach is particularly evident in regions such as the Middle East,where global GPs have been creating a presence in order to build relationships with local LPs.For instance,French private equity firm Ardian opened an office in Abu Dhabi in early 2023 after forming a par
289、tnership with Mubadala Capital.Similarly,Tikehau Capital and Blue Owl Capital have established offices in the region,recognizing the growing investment opportunities and sophistication of local investors.Australian GPs,too,are seeking to get closer to sources of capital by establishing a presence in
290、 North America and Europe.Co-investment Structures The number of co-investment funds that allow LPs to participate directly in preferred deals has grown significantly over the past several years,a trend that we expect will continue.(See Exhibit 23.)Offering generous co-investment structures enables
291、GPs not only to attract capital for specific projects but to build stronger LP relationships,potentially resulting in increased allocations.Retail Investment Opportunities There has also been an uptick in GPs that target new funding sources such as family offices and retail investors to diversify an
292、d expand their capital base.Retail investors represent a major,largely untapped pool of potential capital.Until recently,however,few investment vehicles focused on infrastructure assets available to them.To attract this capital,GPs are creating new vehicles for retail investors,ranging from“mass aff
293、luent”investors that have from$25,000 to$1 million in investable assets to high-net-worth individuals that have up to$30 million to invest,either individually or through family offices.In the US,enabled by Securities and Exchange Commission reforms and other regulatory changes,lower minimum investme
294、nt thresholds and enhanced liquidity structures are making infrastructure investments more accessible while still offering retail investors a level of stability similar to that of traditional institutional infrastructure funds.EXHIBIT 23The Upward Trend in the Number of Co-investment Funds Shows LPs
295、 Increasing Demand for These OpportunitiesSources:Preqin;infrastructure investors;BCG analysis.Note:AuM=assets under management;GP=general partner;LP=limited partner.1Includes all co-investment funds tagged specifically to infrastructure industries,as well as diversified co-investment funds that inc
296、lude infrastructure;does not include direct co-investment in deals.Top 20 GPs by infrastructure AuM of the 58 largest infrastructure investors.2013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320244456876314161723Annual co-investment funds by fund vintage year fortop 20 GPs by infrastructure AuM(number of
297、 funds)1+7%+31%Sources:Preqin;infrastructure investors;BCG analysis.Note:AuM=assets under management;GP=general partner;LP=limited partner.1Includes all co-investment funds tagged specifically to infrastructure industries,as well as diversified co-investment funds that include infrastructure;does no
298、t include direct co-investment in deals.Top 20 GPs by infrastructure AuM of the 58 largest infrastructure investors.The Upward Trend in the Number of Co-investment Funds Shows LPs Increasing Demand for These OpportunitiesEXHIBIT 23BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET
299、CLASS MATURES 33Several asset managers have already launched retail-accessible infrastructure funds.For example,Blackstones BXINFRA targets individuals with at least$5 million in investable assets,offering a range of semi-liquid infrastructure investments.Similarly,DWS Groups DWS RREEF Global Infras
300、tructure Fund gives retail investors exposure to diversified infrastructure assets with strong cash-yield potential.Meanwhile,Schroders Capital,through Schroders Greencoat,allows retail and intermediary investors to participate in renewable energy infrastructure.The growing interest that retail inve
301、stors are showing in infrastructure assets reflects a broader shift in the sector,where capital traditionally dominated by institutional investors is increasingly being supplemented by individual investors and alternative funding sources.This trend aligns with a wider movement toward expanding acces
302、s to private market investments,as regulatory changes and innovative fund structures make infrastructure more accessible to a broader range of investors.Value Creation Through Operational ExcellenceStrengthening operational value creation remains a focus for infrastructure investment funds,as we not
303、ed last year.The investment playbooks of different GPs are evolving along varied paths,but firms generally tackle the task through some combination of five approaches.Dedicated Operational TeamsGPs have been experimenting in recent years with how to up their game in operational value creation.Perfor
304、mance is paramount.To that end,they have institutionalized their in-house operational capabilities by hiring dedicated specialists or teams,and by formalizing agreements with industry senior advisors and other third-party experts.The task is to support portfolio company management teams with a combi
305、nation of hands-on operational expertise and strategic advisory support to accelerate value creation across all aspects of the enterprises operations.Funds are trying a range of setups,often leveraging the structures and playbooks that already prevail in private equity.Examples include KKR Capstone
306、and Blackstones Portfolio Operations Group.Pull-Forward of Detailed Value Creation PlansBefore signing deals on new investments,funds are demanding increasingly detailed value creation plans(VCPs)during the due diligence stage.These plans include comprehensive benchmarks and strategic blueprints for
307、 value creation opportunities that should help to de-risk deals immediately after closing and quickly align on immediate priorities.When designing their VCPs,leading players incorporate input from all aspects of the business,including commercial,operational,finance,and IT functions.Post-Acquisition
308、De-risking As GPs face a more challenging growth environment for their portfolio companies,they are doubling down on the need to boost value early on.The first 100 days post-acquisition are crucial for improving operational efficiency and financial performance.Areas of focus include immediate screen
309、ing of activitieseven large capex projectswith savings potential,optimization of the procurement function,and implementation of potential improvement levers to optimize the working capital position.Target Operating Model Leading GPs work to develop and refine a lean target operating model for the ne
310、w portfolio company soon after they acquire it.This ensures that the company will deliver on critical value creation initiatives and potential efficiencies.Successful operating models include detailed guidance on any gaps in the key capabilities needed,and on the constitution of the operational team
311、.They also show where efficiencies may be captured,such as in the optimization of selling,general,and administrative expenses.Leveraging benchmarks around common efficiency opportunitiessuch as nearshoring,automation through AI,function consolidation,and delayeringis becoming increasingly common.Fin
312、ance Excellence Positive value creation will depend to a great extent on the strength of the portfolio companys finance function.To that end,leading GPs establish robust financial oversight and systems to optimize cash flow,monitor covenants,and rigorously drive profitability.In doing so,they enhanc
313、e operational control,reduce inefficiencies,and improve financial discipline.Often enough,early enforcement of data quality initiatives and early establishment of standardized financial reporting are critical to providing real-time insights into a companys performance to management and investors,all
314、owing them to identify inefficiencies,optimize operations,and actively manage risks.Optimally,the companys finance function should apply innovative planning approaches,such as zero-based budgeting.BOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 34The infrastructure
315、 asset class continues to demonstrate resilience in a challenging macroeconomic environment,and the sectors structural attractiveness remains strong.Investors continue to be drawn to infrastructure for its stable,long-term returns,high revenue visibility,and core value.The critical nature of infrast
316、ructure assets ensures their continued relevance and reinforces the need for private capital investment in them.This dynamic will drive ongoing innovation in fund strategies as GPs adapt to a more complex investment landscape.The essential role that private capital plays in addressing global challen
317、ges,from the energy transition to digital connectivity,highlights the asset classs importance.As the industry matures,infrastructure investing will remain a core allocation for investors seeking stability,long-term growth,and real-world impact.ConclusionBOSTON CONSULTING GROUPHOW INVESTORS CAN GAIN
318、ADVANTAGE AS THE ASSET CLASS MATURES 35About the Authors Wilhelm Schmundt is a managing director and senior partner in the Munich office of Boston Consulting Group.You may contact him by email at .Benjamin Entraygues is a managing director and senior partner in BCGs Paris office.You may contact him
319、by email at .Emmanuel Austruy is a managing director and partner in BCGs Paris office.You may contact him by email a .Sunil Chandrasekhar is a managing director and partner in BCGs Singapore office.You may contact him by email at .David ONeil is a principal in BCGs Boston office.You may contact him
320、by email at .Julien Vialade is a partner and associate director in the firms Paris office.You may contact him by email at .Alex Wright is a managing director and partner in the firms Boston office.You may contact him by email at .Lauren Powers is a partner in the firms Boston office.You may contact
321、her by email at .Thomas Bumberger is a managing director and partner in the firms Vienna office.You may contact him by email at .Andrew Claerhout is a partner and director in the firms Singapore office.You may contact him by email at .For Further ContactIf you would like to discuss this report,pleas
322、e contact the authors.AcknowledgmentsThe authors wish to thank their many colleagues who made valuable contributions to this report:Stevan Jovanovic,Bora Goekbora,Mark Harris,Braden Holstege,Vinay Shandal,Souail Cherqaoui-Fassi,Maarten Bekking,Laura Borland,Guillaume Darrieus,Maria Enderiz,Roman Fri
323、edrich,Valentina Giacometti,Mads-Peter Langhorn,Eric Ritsema,Emmanuele Belsito,James Loughridge,Sudeep Maitra,Miles Mattson,David Parlongue,Guillaume Rubens,Filip Saelens,Daniel Tanuri,Dieuwertje ten Feld,Thomas Vikenes,Christian Wagener,Daniel Selikowitz,Roger Linares,Samuel Winiger,Nolan Harte,Gle
324、n Gubbay,Dev Chhokra,Daniel Lilienfeld,and Drew Townsend.Boston Consulting Group partners with leaders in business and society to tackle their most important challenges and capture their greatest opportunities.BCG was the pioneer in business strategy when it was founded in 1963.Today,we work closely
325、 with clients to embrace a transformational approach aimed at benefiting all stakeholdersempowering organizations to grow,build sustainable competitive advantage,and drive positive societal impact.Our diverse,global teams bring deep industry and functional expertise and a range of perspectives that
326、question the status quo and spark change.BCG delivers solutions through leading-edge management consulting,technology and design,and corporate and digital ventures.We work in a uniquely collaborative model across the firm and throughout all levels of the client organization,fueled by the goal of hel
327、ping our clients thrive and enabling them to make the world a better place.For information or permission to reprint,please contact BCG at .To find the latest BCG content and register to receive e-alerts on this topic or others,please visit .Follow Boston Consulting Group on LinkedIn,Facebook and X(formerly Twitter).Boston Consulting Group 2025.All rights reserved.3/25