《奧特奇（Alltech）：2024年歐洲收獲季飼料樣品霉菌毒素調查報告（英文版）（15頁）.pdf》由會員分享，可在線閱讀，更多相關《奧特奇（Alltech）：2024年歐洲收獲季飼料樣品霉菌毒素調查報告（英文版）（15頁）.pdf（15頁珍藏版）》請在三個皮匠報告上搜索。

1、HarvestAnalysis|2024EUROPE3.4.5.6.8.10.12.14.IntroductionKey insightsA look around the regionsCornBarleyWheatForagesMycotoxin control solutionsHarvest Analysis|2024TABLE OF CONTENTS3Alltech Harvest Analysis|EUROPE 2024Meeting the mycotoxin challengeContinued collaboration with SGSAlltech is again wo

2、rking with SGS,a world leader in mycotoxin testing services,to expand the reach of this years European Harvest Analysis by collecting and analysing corn samples for Central-Southeast Europe.Combining these resources with findings from our Alltech 37+mycotoxin analysis allows us to continue to delive

3、r a robust assessment of the mycotoxin landscape right across the continent.We are delighted to once again present our Alltech European Harvest Analysis report,a vital resource for understanding the 2024 mycotoxin landscape in Europe.Continuing concerns related to the weathers impact on crop quality

4、 are fuelling unprecedented interest in this years report.This is reflected by the large volume of both grain and forage samples that have been arriving for testing at our Alltech 37+laboratory in Dunboyne,Ireland.As we learn more and more about mycotoxins,we are seeing the damaging effects their pr

5、esence can have on animal health and performance.We are confident that the insights presented here will be of great value to countering some of these challenges and informing the most effective mycotoxin-control decisions for your business over the coming months.Thank you for your continued commitme

6、nt to understanding and addressing these challenges.Whether your goal is to produce the highest-quality feeds or to optimise the performance of your livestock operation,our Alltech team is ready to support you.Yours sincerely,Patrick Charlton,vice president of Europe,Alltech 4Alltech Harvest Analysi

7、s|EUROPE 2024What are this years key insights?1,200new crop samples tested in total between Alltech 37+and SGSSample date range:03/07/2024 to 21/11/202420countries analysed across Europe6Average number of mycotoxins per sampleFigure 1:2024 Alltech European Harvest Analysis key figures A combination

8、of heavy early-season rains and late-season drought has created distinct challenges for crop producers in Central and Southeastern Europe.Aflatoxin levels in corn are once again a concern in Central and Southeastern Europe,and dairy producers should be aware of this challenge.Similar to last year,ba

9、rley shows the highest risk among the small grains,with higher levels of type B trichothecenes than we are seeing in wheat.Although emerging mycotoxins continue to be one of the most prevalent groups,deoxynivalenol(DON)is creating the highest level of risk.Penicillium mycotoxins are driving the majo

10、rity of risk in grass silages,while the majority of the risk in corn silage is due to elevated levels of type B trichothecenes.The final mycotoxin risk will ultimately depend on the animal species and groups being fed,as well as the mycotoxin concentrations and combinations in the finished diet.5All

11、tech Harvest Analysis|EUROPE 2024Western Europe Wheat and barley samples are generally low-to moderate-risk,although barley carries a higher risk compared to wheat.Emerging mycotoxins are the most commonly detected group in small grains,followed by type B trichothecenes and fumonisins.Type B trichot

12、hecenes,such as deoxynivalenol,as well as ergot alkaloids pose the greatest risk in small grains.Forages such as grass silage and corn silage are higher-risk,with average Penicillium toxin levels of 293 parts per billion(ppb).Northwestern Europe Central and Southern Europe Corn silage is at higher r

13、isk,with the main risk coming from type B trichothecenes.Barley and wheat are of similar quality and present moderate mycotoxin risk.Corn in this region is of moderate risk.The most prevalent mycotoxins in corn are aflatoxins,fumonisins and ochratoxin A,while the most risk comes from aflatoxin B1 an

14、d ochratoxin A.The average concentration of aflatoxin B1 is 10.4 ppb,while a maximum concentration of 506 ppb was found in Hungarian corn.Fumonisins are most prevalent in forages,but type B trichothecenes are driving most of the risk.Barley has a high mycotoxin risk,with the main risk contributors b

15、eing type B trichothecenes and type A trichothecenes.Wheat also has a high mycotoxin risk,with type B trichothecenes being the most prevalent group.Straw is high-risk again this year,with average type B trichothecene levels of 1,928 ppb.The average risk equivalent quantity(REQ)for wheat and barley i

16、s high,and that risk is higher than in 2023.Eastern Europe Type B trichothecenes and type A trichothecenes are the most prevalent and highest-risk mycotoxins in corn silage.Grass silage has a moderate mycotoxin risk,mainly driven by the other Penicillium mycotoxins.Corn from this region is high-risk

17、 due to the high prevalence of T-2/HT-2 toxins and deoxynivalenol.The average concentration of aflatoxin B1 is 49 ppb,with a maximum concentration of 566 ppb found in Ukrainian corn,indicating a high risk.A look around the regions 6Alltech Harvest Analysis|EUROPE 2024Corn resultsOccurrence(%)and ave

18、rage and maximum mycotoxin concentrations(ppb)Mycotoxin groupOccurrence(%)(above LOQ)Average(ppb)Maximum(ppb)Aflatoxins,total80.813.3566Ochratoxins39.5391,417Deoxynivalenol11183.61,766T2-HT2 toxins28.165.62,329Fumonisins54.5599.46,990Zearalenone2145.286418/08/2024 to 21/11/2024 Sampledate rangeHighe

19、st-risk mycotoxins Ochratoxin A Aflatoxin B1 T2-HT2 toxins2.9 Average tests per sampleFigure 2:The multiple mycotoxin risk in corn samples.Analysed by SGS.CORN7Alltech Harvest Analysis|EUROPE 202476.6%46.0%25.0%6.5%16.9%25.0%29.0%20.2%54.8%LowModerateHighPercentage of samples at lower,moderate or hi

20、gher risk for each species.REQ:A measurement of the cumulative impact of mycotoxins in reference to aflatoxin B1.How will this impact species and animal groups?Dairy cowsGrow/finish pigsBroilers-0.129+18.6Change in milk production,litres/cow/dayChange in average daily gain,grams/dayChange in average

21、 daily gain,grams/dayChange in somatic cell count,%Change in feed conversion rate,%Change in feed conversion rate,%-48.41+0.07-2.8+1.78Average REQ 56Average REQ 144Average REQ 109Figure 3:Analysis of the REQ and performance effects of mycotoxin contamination of corn samples.CORN8Alltech Harvest Anal

22、ysis|EUROPE 2024Barley resultsOccurrence(%)and average and maximum mycotoxin concentrations(ppb)Mycotoxin groupOccurrence(%)Average(ppb)Maximum(ppb)Emerging mycotoxins94.7262.62,847Type B trichothecenes81.1347.213,178Type A trichothecenes75.831.9266Fumonisins44.712.1126Ergot toxins13.645.42,768Zeara

23、lenone11.44.6240Fusaric acid8.30.830Other Penicillium mycotoxins6.81.5164Other Aspergillus mycotoxins5.30.2603/07/2024 to 30/10/2024 Sample date rangeHighest-risk mycotoxins Type B trichothecenes Type A trichothecenes Ergot alkaloids6.8 Average mycotoxins per sample98%Samples with 2 or more mycotoxi

24、nsFigure 4:The multiple mycotoxin risk in barley samples.Analysed by Alltech 37+BARLEY9Alltech Harvest Analysis|EUROPE 2024How will this impact species and animal groups?LowModerateHighPercentage of samples at lower,moderate or higher risk for each species.REQ:A measurement of the cumulative impact

25、of mycotoxins in reference to aflatoxin B1.Dairy cowsGrow/finish pigsBroilers-0.175+25.24Change in milk production,litres/cow/dayChange in average daily gain,grams/dayChange in average daily gain,grams/dayChange in somatic cell count,%Change in feed conversion rate,%Change in feed conversion rate,%-

26、26.22+0.04-1.77+1.75Figure 5:Analysis of the REQ and performance effects of mycotoxin contamination of barley samples.8.3%13.6%16.7%38.6%34.1%43.9%53.1%52.3%39.4%Average REQ 79.5Average REQ 78.2Average REQ 69.3BARLEY10Alltech Harvest Analysis|EUROPE 2024Wheat resultsOccurrence(%)and average and maxi

27、mum mycotoxin concentrations(ppb)Mycotoxin groupOccurrence(%)Average(ppb)Maximum(ppb)Type B trichothecenes91.9237.92,383Emerging mycotoxins90.1107.93,114Fumonisins78.420.382Type A trichothecenes63.111.793Zearalenone21.63.5172Ergot toxins17.114.7933Fusaric acid14.41.240Other Penicillium mycotoxins7.2

28、2.1206Ochratoxin/Citrinin2.72.7279Figure 6:The multiple mycotoxin risk in wheat samples.Analysed by Alltech 37+08/08/2024 to 29/10/2024 Sample date rangeHighest-risk mycotoxins Type B trichothecenes Type A trichothecenes7.6 Average mycotoxins per sample99%Samples with two or more mycotoxinsWHEAT11Al

29、ltech Harvest Analysis|EUROPE 2024How will this impact species and animal groups?LowModerateHighPercentage of samples at lower,moderate or higher risk for each species.REQ:A measurement of the cumulative impact of mycotoxins in reference to aflatoxin B1.Dairy cowsGrow/finish pigsBroilers-0.09+12.95C

30、hange in milk production,litres/cow/dayChange in average daily gain,grams/dayChange in average daily gain,grams/dayChange in somatic cell count,%Change in feed conversion rate,%Change in feed conversion rate,%-16.14+0.02-0.95+1.73Figure 7:Analysis of the REQ and performance effects of mycotoxin cont

31、amination of wheat samples.51.4%59.5%4.5%17.1%9.9%6.3%78.4%38.7%34.2%Average REQ 39.9Average REQ 48.7Average REQ 37.5WHEAT12Alltech Harvest Analysis|EUROPE 2024Forage results Grass silage,corn silage and strawOccurrence(%)and average and maximum mycotoxin concentrations(ppb)Mycotoxin groupOccurrence

32、(%)Average(ppb)Maximum(ppb)Type B trichothecenes73.2748.99,446Emerging mycotoxins43.6168.15,900Fumonisins42.317.8288Other Penicillium mycotoxins40.31652,090Fusaric acid20.845.92,021Type A trichothecenes19.58160Zearalenone6.79.8545Ergot toxins2.72.3255Other Aspergillus mycotoxins2.00.17Figure 8:The m

33、ultiple mycotoxin risk in forage samples.Analysed by Alltech 37+01/08/2024 to 31/10/2024 Sample date rangeHighest-risk mycotoxins Other Penicillium mycotoxins Type B trichothecenes3.7 Average mycotoxins per sample78%Samples with two or more mycotoxinsFORAGE13Alltech Harvest Analysis|EUROPE 2024How w

34、ill this impact species and animal groups?LowModerateHighPercentage of samples at lower,moderate or higher risk for each species.REQ:A measurement of the cumulative impact of mycotoxins in reference to aflatoxin B1.Dairy cowsCalf/HeiferBeef cattle-0.46+66.42Change in milk production,litres/cow/dayCh

35、ange in somatic cell count,%Figure 9:Analysis of the REQ and performance effects of mycotoxin contamination of forage samples.34.9%22.2%39.6%37.6%57.7%34.2%27.5%20.1%26.2%Average REQ 193.6Average REQ 58.3Average REQ 174FORAGE14Alltech Harvest Analysis|EUROPE 20240204050301A proven program from Allte

36、ch Mycotoxin ManagementAlltech believes that effective mycotoxin management is about seeing the whole challenge,from the farm to the feed mill and from risk assessment to feed management.To effectively manage the inevitability of feed mycotoxin contamination,it is crucial to understand the level of

37、mycotoxin challenge so that the right steps can be taken to mitigate any adverse effects on animal performance,production efficiency and food safety.Learn more about Alltech Mycotoxin Management,our services and solutions,and the latest information on the threat of mycotoxins at .The mycotoxin testi

38、ng methods used across both the Alltech 37+and SGS laboratories will differ and utilise separate limits of quantification(LOQ).The mycotoxin occurrence numbers in corn reported on page 6 are based on a higher LOQ than the barley and wheat data on pages 8 and 10.RiskeducationRiskidentificationRiskqua

39、ntificationRiskmitigationRiskevaluationHarvest analysis programsPodcasts and Alltech 37+Alltech RAPIREADMycotoxin Management PortalAlltech PROTECT(REQ)Alltech DIET EstimatorMycosorb family of mycotoxin adsorbentsMycotoxin technical teamOn-farm supportFeed mill servicesA UKAlltech House|Ryhall Road|Stamford|Lincolnshire|PE9 1TZTel:+44(0)1780764512 Email: