隱私訴訟趨勢：過去、現在與未來.pdf

《隱私訴訟趨勢：過去、現在與未來.pdf》由會員分享，可在線閱讀，更多相關《隱私訴訟趨勢：過去、現在與未來.pdf（20頁珍藏版）》請在三個皮匠報告上搜索。

1、PRIVACY LITIGATION TRENDS:PAST,PRESENT,AND FUTURETiana DemasPartner,Cooley LLPDanielle PierreLitigation Counsel,GoogleWELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONSPRIVACY LITIGATION TRENDSI.StatisticsII.Litigation Overview&Key Casesa.BIPAb.CCPAc.WiretapIII.Other Important Developments&TrendlinesSTATISTICSDATA PRIVACY F

2、EDERAL LAWSUITS FILED0200400600800100012001400160018002000201820192020202120222023STATISTICS:OUTCOME ANALYTICS02004006008001000120014001600180020192020202120222023Uncontested DismissalSettledDispositive MotionVerdictDocketed ElsewhereOtherDATA PRIVACY LITIGATION OUTCOMESUncontested Dismissal40%Settl

3、ed32%Dispositive Motion6%Verdict1%Docketed Elsewhere16%Other5%Uncontested DismissalSettledDispositive MotionVerdictDocketed ElsewhereOtherSource:Westlaw Litigation Analytics Data for Data PrivacyDATA PRIVACY DISPOSITIVE MOTIONSMotion to Dismiss78%Summary Judgment9%Default Judgment13%Motion to Dismis

4、sSummary JudgmentDefault JudgmentSource:Westlaw Litigation Analytics Data for Data PrivacyLITIGATION OVERVIEW&KEY CASESBIPA LITIGATION OVERVIEW BIPA litigation saw active participation across diverse industriesMajor court rulings increased from 74(2021)to 90(2022)Settlement amounts varied between$25

5、0,000 and$100 million,exceeding 2021 rangeFirst BIPA class-action trial resulted in a groundbreaking$228 million verdictBIPA LANDMARK DECISIONS(2022 PRESENT)Rogers v.BNSF Railway Co.(established vicarious liability under BIPA)Mora v.J&M Plating,Inc.(discussed timing of implementation of data retenti

6、on policies)McDonald v.Symphony Bronzeville Park,LLC(rejected preemption of BIPA by Illinois Workers Compensation Act)Barnett v.Apple:Clarified possession,capture,or collect of biometric data under BIPATims v.Black Horse Carriers(BIPA statute of limitations)Cothron v.White Castle System(claim accrua

7、l and distinct violations per fingerprint scan)CCPA A FOUR-YEAR REVIEWDecrease in new complaints in 2022,most in connection with data breaches.Plaintiffs claims under CCPA evolved,including attempts to apply the Act retroactively,extend its provisions to non-residents,and use the CCPA as a predicate

8、 for other claims.In Hayden v.Retail Equation,Inc.,C.D.Cal.provided further clarification on these issues.2023 introduced the California Privacy Rights Act(CPRA),enforced by the California AG and the new California Privacy Protection Agency from July 1,2023.CCPA KEY FINDINGSThe CCPA does not shield

9、a defendant from liability under Californias Unfair Competition Law,as seen in Kellman v.Spokeo,Inc.To properly articulate CCPA claims,plaintiffs must meet specific requirements,particularly concerning allegations of a lack of reasonable security.In re Waste Mgmt.Data Breach Litigation highlighted t

10、he inadequacy of stating that the data is still out there as a failure to cure a breach.WIRETAP2023 saw a surge of data privacy lawsuits,imposing wiretapping liability on website operators and service providers.Over 120 lawsuits across nine jurisdictions,with California and Pennsylvania being the fo

11、cal points.Second wave of lawsuits expanding scope beyond California and Florida.Major focus on live chat recording in this wave.Unique argument under California Invasion of Privacy Act(CIPA),Sections 631 and 632 being brought forward.WIRETAPCalifornia,the hub of new filings,hasnt seen significant c

12、hanges in law since the first wave.Noteworthy rulings include Ninth Circuits ruling in Javier v.Assurance IQ,LLC and Judge William Alsups decision in Williams v.What If Holdings,LLC.Pennsylvania witnessing surge in activity,triggered by the Third Circuits opinion in Popa v.Harriet Carter Gifts,Inc.K

13、ey issues to watch:Role of analytics companies under CIPA(tape recorder or eavesdropper),possible defenses in Pennsylvania,and potential rulings in other jurisdictions.OTHER IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENTS&TRENDLINESIMPORTANT DEVELOPMENTS&TRENDLINESFTC v.Kocheva(that harms are theoretically possible is insuf

14、ficient;now passed the MTD)Katz-Lacabe v Oracle America Inc.(allegation of compiling browsing activity,online communications,and offline activity sufficient to state a claim for invasion of privacy)WHATS NEXT?Utahs Notice of Intent to Sell Nonpublic Non-Personal Information Act,Utah Code Ann.13-37Li

15、ttle-used before 2023Bars class actionsOne D.Utah judge has held that class actions can be brought in federal court.Since that decision,there have been more cases filed in D.Utah against publishers concerning list rental businesses.How Did Things Go?(We Really Want To Know)Did you enjoy this session

16、?Is there any way we could make it better?Let us know by filling out a speaker evaluation.1.Open the Cvent Events app.2.Enter IAPP GPS24(case and space sensitive)in search bar.3.Tap Schedule on the bottom navigation bar.4.Find this session.Click Rate this Session within the description.5.Once youve answered all three questions,tap Done.