中國最高人民法院：中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況報告（2022年）（68頁）.pdf

《中國最高人民法院：中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況報告（2022年）（68頁）.pdf》由會員分享，可在線閱讀，更多相關《中國最高人民法院：中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況報告（2022年）（68頁）.pdf（68頁珍藏版）》請在三個皮匠報告上搜索。

1、前 言1一、充分發揮審判職能，服務創新驅動發展2二、激勵保障科技創新，促進科技自立自強5三、加強商標司法保護，助推品牌培育發展7四、強化著作權審判，服務文化強國建設 9五、維護競爭法治環境，激發創新創造活力 11六、深入推進司法改革，提升整體保護效能 13七、堅持依法平等保護，促進國際交流合作 17八、發揮黨建引領作用，鍛造一流審判隊伍 18結束語 20附件：2022 年全國法院新收知識產權案件類型與數量圖 21目錄中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 12023/4/17 15:51:28CONTENTSIntroduction.25I.Fully Utilized Trial

2、 Functions to Support Innovation-Driven Development.26II.Encouraged and Assured Scientific and Technological Innovation to Promote Self-reliance and Strength.32III.Increased the Judicial Protection of Trademarks to Enable the Growth of Successful Brands .37IV.Strengthened Copyright Trials to Contrib

3、ute to the Building of a Country with a Strong Culture .41V.Maintained a Sound Legal Environment for Competition to Stimulate Innovation and Creativity.44VI.Deepened Judicial Reforms to Improve Efficiency and Quality of IPRs Protection.48VII.Upheld the Legal Equality in IPRs Protection and Promoted

4、International Communication and Cooperation.58VIII.Leveraged the Guiding Role of Party Building to Build a First-Class Judicial Team.60Conclusion.63中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 22023/4/17 15:51:28特別說明：中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022 年）以中英兩種文本發布，以中文文本為準。Special Remarks:This paper is published in both Chinese and En

5、glish.The Chinese version shall be the authoritative version for interpretation purposes.中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 32023/4/17 15:51:281-中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022 年）前 言黨的二十大報告強調實現高質量發展是中國式現代化的本質要求之一，明確堅持創新在我國現代化建設全局中的核心地位，并專門就加強知識產權法治保障作出部署。2022 年，人民法院堅持以 習近平新時代中國特色社會主義思想為指導，全面貫徹落實黨的二十大精神，深入貫徹習近平法治思想，心懷國之大

6、者，緊緊圍繞“努力讓人民群眾在每一個司法案件中感受到公平正義”目標，增強做好新時代知識產權審判工作的責任感使命感，推動知識產權司法保護水平不斷提升。中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 12023/4/17 15:51:282-一、充分發揮審判職能，服務創新驅動發展2022 年，人民法院著力強化審判職能作用，依法公正高效審理各類知識產權案件，新收一審、二審、申請再審等各類知識產權案件 526165 件，審結 543379 件（含舊存，下同），比 2021 年分別下降 18.17%和 9.67%。地方各級人民法院新收知識產權民事一審案件 438480 件，審結 457805 件，比

7、 2021 年 分 別 下 降 20.31%和 11.25%。其 中，新收專利案件 38970 件，同比上升 23.25%；商標案件 112474 件，同比下降 9.82%；著作權案件 255693 件，同比下降 29.07%；技術合同案件 4238 件，同比上升 5.55%；競爭類案件 9388 件，同比上升 11.51%；其他知識產權民事糾紛案件 17717 件，同比下降15.66%。地方各級人民法院新收知識產權民事二審案件 46524 件，審結 46563 件，同比分別下降 5.22%和上升 2.41%。最高人民法院新收知識產權民事案件 3786 件，審結 3073 件，比 2021 年

8、分別下降10.77%和 13.61%。地方各級人民法院新收知識產權行政一審案件 20634 件，審結17630 件，比 2021 年分別上升 0.35%和下降 8.85%。其中，新收專利案件 1876 件，同比上升 3.65%；商標案件 18738 件，比 2021 年增加 4 件；著作權案件 12 件，比 2021 年減少 7 件；其他案件 8 件。地方各級人民法院新收知識產權行政二審案件 5897 件，審結 7285件，比 2021 年分別下降 28.22%和 1.79%。其中，維持原判 5518件，改判 1650 件，發回重審 3 件，撤訴 78 件，駁回起訴 10 件，其中國法院知識產

9、權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 22023/4/17 15:51:283-他 26 件。最高人民法院新收知識產權行政案件 1456 件，審結 1542件，比 2021 年分別下降 48.95%和 38%。地方各級人民法院新收侵犯知識產權刑事一審案件 5336 件，審結 5456 件，比 2021 年分別下降 14.98%和 9.76%。其中，新收侵犯注冊商標類刑事案件 4971 件，審結 5099 件，同比下降 15.3%和9.86%；新收侵犯著作權類刑事案件 304 件，審結 302 件，同比下降 8.71%和 7.93%；新收其他刑事案件 61 件，審結 55 件，比 2021年減少

10、 13 件和 6 件。地方各級人民法院新收涉知識產權的刑事二審案件 979 件，審結 977 件，同比分別下降 6.76%和 2.01%。2022 年，人民法院受理的知識產權案件呈現以下主要特點。技術類案件數量持續上升，中西部等地知識產權保護需求強勁，知識產權司法服務高質量發展作用進一步凸顯。2022 年，最高人民法院知識產權法庭新收技術類知識產權民事二審實體案件數量保持較高增長。地方各級人民法院新收涉專利、技術合同一審案件數量增幅明顯。江蘇法院新收技術性較強的知識產權權屬、侵權糾紛案件 1817 件，同比增長 17.61%。山西、海南法院新收知識產權案件數量同比增長達 22.21%和 72.

11、58%。河北法院知識產權案件收結案數同比增長 45.94%和 106.01%。遼寧法院新收知識產權民事案件數同比增長 61%。江西法院新收知識產權民事一審案件數同比增長22%。湖南、黑龍江、新疆生產建設兵團等地法院收案量也延續了穩定增長的態勢。知識產權案件互聯網審判機制不斷創新，智慧法院建設深入推進，司法便民利民機制持續健全。各地法院依托互聯網審判平臺，中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 32023/4/17 15:51:294-全面開展知識產權案件線上庭審、送達等工作，有效縮短訴訟周期，降低訴訟成本。上海法院全年知識產權案件線上立案 38505 件，組織在線開庭、談話等 2

12、萬余場，電子送達超 17 萬次。河南法院知識產權一審案件網上立案 16023 件，網上立案率超 90%。青海法院知識產權案件網上立案率達 62.7%，通過送達平臺電子送達 898 次。廣西貴港中院利用數字賦能，全年網上立案量約占全部受理知識產權案件的 70%。青島知識產權法庭建設互聯網異步質證系統，當事人在線上傳電子化證據材料完成質證，庭前程序更加高效便捷。糾紛實質性化解持續加強，權利人權益保障更加全面，人民群眾知識產權司法獲得感日益增強。2022 年，全國法院知識產權民事一審案件調解結案 44155 件，調解結案率 9.64%，比 2021 年增加 0.78 個百分點。知識產權民事二審案件解

13、調結案 2894 件，調解結案率 6.22%，比 2021 年增加 0.57 個百分點。天津法院知識產權民事一審案件調撤率達 75.51%。河北法院知識產權案件調撤率達73.48%。廣東法院知識產權民事一審案件調撤率為 52.94%。黑龍江法院全年知識產權案件總體調撤率達 66.6%。當事人訴累有效減輕，社會和諧穩定得到充分維護。江蘇法院審理適用懲罰性賠償的知識產權案件 97 件，同比增長 21.25%。上海浦東法院全年審理 25 件適用懲罰性賠償知識產權案件。深圳中院在 29 件知識產權案件中適用懲罰性賠償，累計判賠金額達 1.69 億元。湖南法院開展專項行動，執結涉知識產權案件 3796

14、件，執行到位金額 6043.15 萬元。廣東法院不到 20%的知識產權民事案件進入強制執行，執行案件結收比約98%。江蘇法院針對涉食品、藥品等重點民生領域侵犯知識產權犯中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 42023/4/17 15:51:295-罪行為，發放“從業禁止令”近百份。貴州貴陽中院全年辦理知識產權財產保全案件 25 件，依申請查封、凍結財產 4010 萬元。知識產權侵權違法成本顯著提高，權利人損失得到有效彌補。審判重心有序下沉，中級、高級法院管轄分工更加完善，知識產權案件審判質效穩步提升。2022 年，江蘇基層法院知識產權案件受理數占全省知識產權案件總數的 65.25

15、%，同比上升 10.52個百分點，中級法院和高級法院案件受理數占比減少至 31.56%和3.19%。重慶基層法院新收知識產權案件數占全市知識產權案件總數的 75.2%，同比增長 28.1 個百分點；中級法院占 21.3%，同比下降 29.9 個百分點；高級法院占 3.5%，同比增長 1.8 個百分點。知識產權案件審理“金字塔”格局逐步形成。地方各級人民法院審結的知識產權民事一審案件中，有 320 件結案方式為上級法院提級管轄，數量是 2021 年的 3 倍多。江西法院全年提級審理 63 件知識產權民事一審案件，廣東法院全年提級審理 15 件新類型、疑難復雜或者具有法律適用指導意義的知識產權案件

16、，有效促進裁判規則統一。二、激勵保障科技創新，促進科技自立自強加快實現高水平科技自立自強，是推動高質量發展的必由之路。人民法院充分發揮知識產權審判對科技創新的激勵和保障作用，通過高質量知識產權司法，支持基礎研究，保障原創性引領性科技攻關，打通制約推進高質量發展的卡點瓶頸。中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 52023/4/17 15:51:296-（一）持續推動技術類案件裁判標準統一人民法院以強化保護為導向，加強對專利授權確權行政行為合法性的嚴格審查，推動行政標準與司法標準統一，促進專利授權確權質量提升。充分發揮司法裁判在科技創新成果保護中的規則引領和價值導向功能，總結提煉司法

17、保護新規則，促進技術和產業不斷創新升級。2022 年，最高人民法院合理定位四級法院審判職能，明確發明專利、實用新型專利、植物新品種、集成電路布圖設計、技術秘密、計算機軟件的權屬、侵權糾紛案件由知識產權法院、省會城市中級法院和最高人民法院確定的中級法院集中管轄，有效促進全國技術類案件裁判標準統一，提升重大科技創新的司法保障水平。發布上一年度中國法院 10 大知識產權案件和 50 件典型知識產權案例，其中包括 11 件技術類案件，分別涉及侵害技術秘密、侵害植物新品種權、侵害發明專利權等，有效指導審判實踐。對關于審理申請注冊的藥品相關的專利權糾紛民事案件適用法律若干問題的規定等司法解釋的實施情況進行

18、調研，及時總結案件審判經驗。最高人民法院審理“氣化爐除塵裝置及系統”專利權權屬案，合理界定技術來源方和技術改進方獲得權利的基礎。審理齊魯制藥與四環制藥專利無效行政糾紛案，明確藥品專利創造性和說明書充分公開的判斷標準。審理“整體式土工格室”侵害實用新型專利權糾紛案，明確合法來源抗辯中是否盡到合理注意義務的審查思路。（二）著力服務保障基礎研究及原始創新人民法院立足“四個面向”，加強關鍵領域、核心技術、新興產業知識產權司法保護，維護創新主體合法權益，服務保障打贏關鍵中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 62023/4/17 15:51:297-核心技術攻堅戰。最高人民法院深入貫徹落實黨

19、中央關于種業振興決策部署，與農業農村部等部門聯合印發關于保護種業知識產權打擊假冒偽劣套牌侵權營造種業振興良好環境的指導意見，發布第二批人民法院種業知識產權司法保護典型案例 10 件，支持設立人民法院知識產權司法保護種質資源研究（海南）基地并首次以基地名義召開種質資源知識產權司法保護研討會。審理的“金粳 818”水稻品種侵權案入選“新時代推動法治進程 2021 年度十大案件”。審結全國首例藥品專利鏈接訴訟案，推動藥品專利鏈接制度落地完善，入選“新時代推動法治進程 2022 年度十大提名案件”。在兩起“蜜胺”專利及技術秘密侵權關聯案件中，判令各被告連帶賠償權利人經濟損失合計 2.18 億元，切實體

20、現大力保護科技創新的司法導向。審理“油氣微生物勘探”技術秘密侵權案，釋放加強技術秘密保護的強烈信號。江蘇高院與省有關部門圍繞知識產權助力產業強鏈和自主可控現代產業體系建設簽署備忘錄，建立服務重點產業鏈發展工作機制。蘇州知識產權法庭在涉美國公司侵害發明專利權糾紛案中促成當事雙方達成一攬子和解，有力維護創新主體合法權益。合肥知識產權法庭與行政執法機關及省內企業座談，聽取回應市場創新主體維權需求。三、加強商標司法保護，助推品牌培育發展人民法院持續加強商標權司法保護，不斷提高商標授權確權行政案件和商標民事案件審理質量，維護商標申請注冊及使用秩序，中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 72

21、023/4/17 15:51:298-引導權利人依法申請注冊并規范使用商標，堅決維護市場法治環境，助力新時代品牌強國建設。（一）提升商標授權確權質量提高商標授權確權行政案件審理質量，堅決打擊不以使用為目的的商標惡意注冊行為，科學合理界定商標權權利邊界與保護范圍，促進商標申請注冊秩序正?；鸵幏痘?。最高人民法院與國家知識產權局開展座談，征集全國法院意見，為商標法修改、地理標志立法等法律修改制定工作提供高質量建議參考，推動商標類法規制度不斷健全，商標授權確權規則更加完善。最高人民法院審結的“陳麻花”商標無效行政案入選“新時代推動法治進程 2022 年度十大案件”，為判斷其他缺乏顯著特征的標志提供了

22、有效指導。審理“BIODERMA”商標申請駁回復審案，明確英文商標顯著性的判斷標準。審理“友聯”商標無效宣告案，闡明違反誠信原則，未合理避讓他人在先商標的商標不應予以注冊。北京高院組建商標駁回復審案件、普通商標行政案件審判團隊，推進案件集約化辦理，商標駁回復審行政案件平均審理周期縮短至 35 天，切實實現簡案快審、繁案精審。（二）加大商標司法保護力度不斷強化商標使用對確定商標權保護范圍的作用，積極引導權利人持續實際使用商標，發揮商標的識別功能，保護消費者合法權益。加強馳名商標、傳統品牌和老字號司法保護，依法支持商標品牌建設。完善地理標志司法保護規則，遏制侵犯地理標志權利行為。最高人民法院審理“

23、南廟”豆腐商標侵權案，依法保護其他經營者中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 82023/4/17 15:51:299-對注冊商標中所含地名的正當使用。審理“一品石”商標侵權案，依法制止惡意取得商標并提起侵權訴訟的權利濫用行為。北京高院和北京知識產權法院積極為北京冬奧會和冬殘奧會的奧運品牌保護工作提供支持，收到組委會發來的感謝信。四川高院依法處理“青花椒”商標維權案，維護商標使用秩序，保護誠信經營。浙江高院組織開展地理標志商標司法保護重點課題調研，助力地理標志司法保護水平提升。海南自由貿易港知識產權法院調研形成地理標志司法保護指南，探索知識產權保護與鄉村振興融合發展。北京西城法院

24、走訪轄區老字號企業，建立涉老字號知識產權案件掛賬審理機制，促進“老字號”煥發“新活力”。四、強化著作權審判，服務文化強國建設人民法院充分發揮著作權審判對于優秀文化的引領和導向功能，加強著作權和相關權利保護，促進文化和科學事業發展與繁榮，服務社會主義文化強國建設。（一）大力弘揚社會主義先進文化立足司法審判職能，以社會主義核心價值觀為引領，堅持弘揚社會主義先進文化，促進中華優秀傳統文化創造性轉化、創新性發展，激發全民族文化創新創造活力，增強實現中華民族偉大復興的精神力量。依法審理涉及紅色經典傳承和英烈合法權益保護案件，大力弘揚社會主義核心價值觀。加強遺傳資源、傳統文化、傳統知識、民間文藝等著作權保

25、護，促進非物質文化遺產的整理和利用。中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 92023/4/17 15:51:2910-高度重視網絡直播、短視頻、動漫游戲、文化創意等新領域著作權保護，打擊盜版、抄襲行為，繁榮發展文化事業和文化產業。北京、天津、上海法院對盜播北京冬奧會、卡塔爾世界杯等行為及時作出禁令，促進優化數字文化市場環境。江蘇宿遷中院分析研判當地圖書盜版案件特點，向行政主管機關發送司法建議，有效遏制圖書侵權盜版行為。廣西欽州中院審結跨省制售盜版教材教輔著作權犯罪案，獲評 2022 年全國青少年版權保護十大典型案件。北京互聯網法院發布“版權鏈天平鏈協同治理平臺”2.0 版本，實現

26、數字版權確權、授權、交易、維權各環節全覆蓋，推動版權要素市場健康有序發展。福建泉州德化法院構建陶瓷知識產權“1234”保護機制，推動破解證據保全、執法監管、社會認同、糾紛化解四大難題，獲世界知識產權組織高度評價。（二）提升新時代著作權司法水平人民法院全面貫徹實施著作權法，保護著作權以及與著作權有關的權益。最高人民法院不斷總結審判經驗，組織地方法院共同開展調研，起草著作權司法解釋，著力解決著作權審判領域法律適用疑難問題。依法提審并改判“大頭兒子”美術作品著作權侵權案，厘清著作權歸屬認定規則，取得良好社會效果。辦理侵害作品信息網絡傳播權管轄請示案，明確侵害信息網絡傳播權民事案件管轄問題及司法解釋適

27、用標準，有效指導著作權審判實踐。北京高院就圖片侵權案件許可使用費標準的確定形成答復，促進轄區圖片侵權案件裁判尺度統一。湖北法院在著作權類型化案件審判中積極推廣表格化裁判文書，大幅縮短審理周期。四川、重慶高院聯合印發會議中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 102023/4/17 15:51:2911-紀要，統一兩地同類侵害信息網絡傳播權案件裁判標準。黑龍江高院與省版權局等九家單位就打擊侵犯著作權違法犯罪會簽通知文件，加強銜接配合，加大著作權刑事保護力度。北京知識產權法院統籌處理中文學術文獻網絡數據庫企業間著作權侵權互訴系列案，一攬子促成全市 1000 余起案件調解，妥善化解潛在糾

28、紛。五、維護競爭法治環境，激發創新創造活力人民法院持續加強反壟斷和反不正當競爭司法，強化競爭政策基礎地位，維護公平競爭的市場法治環境，優化營商環境，服務構建高水平社會主義市場經濟體制。（一）加強反壟斷、反不正當競爭司法2022 年，人民法院不斷完善競爭領域法律適用規則，強化公平競爭司法審判，維護市場競爭法治秩序。最高人民法院出臺關于適用中華人民共和國反不正當競爭法若干問題的解釋，對反不正當競爭法“一般條款”、仿冒混淆、虛假宣傳、商業詆毀、網絡不正當競爭行為等問題作出細化規定，統一裁判標準，回應新領域新業態司法需求。研究起草新的反壟斷民事訴訟司法解釋，面向社會公開征求意見，推動健全完善反壟斷案件

29、裁判規則，明確壟斷行為判斷標準。召開人民法院加強反壟斷和反不正當競爭司法新聞發布會，發布人民法院反壟斷和反不正當競爭典型案例各 10 件，增強全社會尊重和保護公平競爭的法治意識，指導各級法院依法制裁壟斷行為、維護公平競爭秩序。各級人民法院加強對平臺經濟、核心技中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 112023/4/17 15:51:2912-術、醫藥、通信等重點領域和關鍵環節的司法審判力度，嚴厲打擊壟斷協議，制止濫用市場支配地位等排除、限制競爭行為。完善涉互聯網平臺壟斷行為認定標準，細化流量劫持、干擾等不正當競爭行為認定，依法規范和引導資本健康發展。最高人民法院審理“張百年”商標

30、侵權及不正當競爭糾紛案和柏瑞潤興不正當競爭糾紛案，明確反不正當競爭糾紛案件中銷售者責任。審理“幼兒園”橫向壟斷協議案和給排水公用企業濫用市場支配地位案，積極回應社會對事關百姓民生的市場競爭行為的關切，及時制止排除、限制競爭行為，切實保障人民群眾從公平競爭中獲益。（二）依法促進數字經濟健康發展積極探索加強數字經濟領域知識產權司法保護，為充分發揮數據要素作用、提高數據要素治理效能提供有力司法服務和保障，促進數字經濟實現高質量發展。加強數據云存儲、數據開源、數據確權、數據交易、數據服務、數據市場不正當競爭等案件審理，切實維護數據安全。開展數據權益知識產權司法保護調研和數字經濟時代公平競爭與知識產權司

31、法保護調研，指導地方法院探索數字經濟審判模式，促進數字經濟創新成果的司法保護。最高人民法院審理“爬蟲平臺數據信息”技術秘密侵權案，明確平臺數據信息可以作為技術秘密保護客體，強化對平臺經營者通過合法經營形成的具有競爭優勢和競爭價值的數據權益保護。江西高院制定知識產權審判服務保障數字經濟發展的意見，提出 13 項服務與保障舉措。廣東深圳中院出臺加強數字經濟知識產權司法保護的實施意見，助力深圳數字經濟高質量發展。北京知識產權法院完成“數字經濟下新業態、中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 122023/4/17 15:51:2913-新模式競爭行為司法規制研究”等課題，妥善審結多起數據

32、侵權案，不斷探索適用反不正當競爭法保護數據的裁判規則。六、深入推進司法改革，提升整體保護效能人民法院深入推進知識產權審判領域改革創新，不斷完善知識產權專門化審判體系，健全知識產權訴訟制度，深化知識產權審判“三合一”改革，統一法律適用標準，加強糾紛多元化解，強化行政執法和司法銜接，促進知識產權司法保護效能全面提升。（一）推進審判體系現代化提升司法能力以最高人民法院知識產權審判部門為牽引、4 個知識產權法院為示范、27 個地方中級人民法院知識產權法庭為重點、地方各級人民法院知識產權審判庭為支撐的專業化審判格局進一步完善。最高人民法院制定關于第一審知識產權民事、行政案件管轄的若干規定，配套發布關于印

33、發基層人民法院管轄第一審知識產權民事、行政案件標準的通知和關于涉及發明專利等知識產權合同糾紛案件上訴管轄問題的通知，健全管轄科學的司法保護體制，合理定位四級法院審判職能，優化審判資源配置，全國具有知識產權民事案件管轄權的基層法院包括互聯網法院已經達 558 家。最高人民法院不斷完善國家層面知識產權案件上訴審理機制，優化知識產權申請再審案件辦理流程，加強監督指導，確保法律正確統一適用。地方各級人民法院調配審判資源、依法適用案件提級管轄等機制，推動知識產權案件的高效審理和當事人權益的充分保障。中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 132023/4/17 15:51:2914-最高人民

34、法院加大指導力度，推進全國 25 個高級法院、236 個中級法院和 275 個基層法院開展知識產權民事、行政和刑事案件“三合一”審判機制改革，十地法院已實現轄區內知識產權案件“三合一”審理機制全覆蓋。積極推動相關規范性文件研究制定，會同最高人民檢察院起草關于辦理侵犯知識產權刑事案件適用法律若干問題的解釋（征求意見稿）并向社會公開征求意見。黑龍江高院協調有關部門為省內受理知識產權案件的中級、基層法院審判庭加掛“知識產權審判庭”牌子，印發實施方案，指導“三合一”工作落地見效。安徽、浙江、河南、青海等地高院與省檢察院、省公安廳聯合出臺完善知識產權刑事案件管轄的指導文件，明確程序銜接，健全協調機制，全

35、面落實“三合一”改革目標。持續完善多元化技術事實查明機制，加強“全國法院技術調查人才庫”建設，超 500 名技術調查專家入庫，全國范圍按需調派和人才共享機制不斷深化，有效緩解技術類案件事實查明難題。廣西、西藏等地高院出臺技術調查官參與知識產權訴訟案件辦理的相關規定，結合地方實際完善制度機制。南京、蘇州知識產權法庭充分發揮技術調查官作用，參與 751 件技術類案件事實調查，參與勘驗、保全 66 次，庭審、聽證 490 次，出具技術調查報告 388 份。人民法院積極探索健全完善知識產權司法保護規則。最高人民法院出臺關于加強中醫藥知識產權司法保護的意見，促進中醫藥傳承創新發展。針對知識產權訴訟特點，

36、推動知識產權訴訟特別程序法研究制定。開展知識產權惡意訴訟規制、懲罰性賠償精準適用等領域的專項調研，著力遏制濫用權利，加強權利人保護。上海高中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 142023/4/17 15:51:2915-院印發知識產權小額訴訟案件辦理意見，推動知識產權案件繁簡分流、小額訴訟程序優化調整。北京、山東、廣東、新疆、內蒙古等地高院及中院，起草或出臺懲罰性賠償的適用指引，發布典型案例，促進懲罰性賠償制度依法嚴格準確落實。（二）參與構建知識產權大保護格局持續加強司法審判與行政執法銜接協作，促進行政執法標準與司法裁判標準統一。最高人民法院會同最高人民檢察院、農業農村部、商務

37、部、文化和旅游部、國家市場監督管理總局、國家知識產權局、國家中醫藥管理局等單位，完善協同配合機制，推進業務交流、數據交換和信息共享。與國家知識產權局、最高人民檢察院等部門印發關于加強知識產權鑒定工作銜接的意見，深化知識產權管理執法部門與司法機關在知識產權鑒定工作中的合作。與國家知識產權局聯合印發關于強化知識產權協同保護的意見，健全知識產權行政保護與司法保護銜接的 13 項具體舉措。陜西高院牽頭與13 家省級機關及院校單位成立秦創原知識產權司法保護中心，建立聯席會議制度，搭建合作平臺。廣州知識產權法院、上海知識產權法院與國家知識產權局開展協作，探索專利行政確權和法院侵權糾紛審理同步進行，有效縮短

38、專利侵權案件審理周期，提升保護效果。積極推進知識產權糾紛多元化解機制建設，深化落實“總對總”在線訴調對接工作機制，完善行政調解協議司法確認制度，促進形成知識產權保護合力。全國 30 個地區實現知識產權調解組織全覆蓋，入駐調解組織、調解員持續增長，人民法院委派訴前調解糾紛 9 萬余件，調解成功率超過 80%，有效化解知識產權糾紛。最高中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 152023/4/17 15:51:2916-人民法院加強與國家版權局、中國作家協會、中國文聯等單位的溝通，推動建立版權保護領域“總對總”在線訴調對接機制。河北高院與省市場監管局聯合簽署知識產權糾紛行政調解協議司法

39、確認工作合作備忘錄，推動 5 件專利糾紛通過行政調解協議司法確認機制化解。山東法院全年辦理知識產權糾紛行政調解協議司法確認案件 146 件。遼寧高院聯合省知識產權局印發關于建立知識產權糾紛在線訴調對接機制的通知，成立 11 個調解組織，110 名調解員入駐，2834 件知識產權糾紛調解成功，成功率達 96.29%。黑龍江高院配合省司法廳組建設立知識產權仲裁院，下發關于依法妥善辦理仲裁保全案件的通知，推動訴訟與仲裁、調解銜接，強化協同治理。推動構建區域知識產權保護機制，加強知識產權誠信體系建設，擴大知識產權司法保護法治宣傳。最高人民法院持續指導相關法院，積極服務京津冀協同發展、長江經濟帶發展、長

40、三角一體化發展、粵港澳大灣區建設、東北全面振興、海南自由貿易港建設、成渝地區雙城經濟圈建設等，助推區域協同創新。湖南、湖北、江西高院推動“長江中游城市群”審判工作協作機制，指導岳陽、咸寧、九江等地中院和有關市場監管部門簽訂跨域知識產權保護協議，探索解決跨區域、規?；?、群體性知識產權侵權新問題。四川、重慶高院聯合舉辦 2022 川渝知識產權保護研討會，強化兩地知識產權一體化保護。北京知識產權法院與天津市三中院、雄安新區中院簽署關于加強知識產權司法保護合作框架協議，推動人才培養、協同審判、經驗分享等方面合作。海南自由貿易港知識產權法院向海中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 1620

41、23/4/17 15:51:2917-南省市場監管局、省知識產權局發出司法建議，將 9 起侵犯知識產權刑事案件的 12 人列入知識產權嚴重違法失信主體名單，向社會公示。遼寧大連中院向當地市場監管局發出司法建議，對 4 名主體故意侵害知識產權的行為予以公示。天津濱海新區法院出臺規定，將知識產權案件被執行人不履行義務的信息向市場監管部門、金融機構及行業協會等通報。知識產權宣傳周期間，最高人民法院召開新聞發布會，組織系列活動，全方位、多視角、深層次展示人民法院知識產權司法保護成果。吉林、甘肅、青海、寧夏、新疆生產建設兵團等地法院精心組織發布典型案例，開展公開庭審、公開執行等活動，促進增強全社會尊重和

42、保護知識產權意識。七、堅持依法平等保護，促進國際交流合作深入推進國際知識產權訴訟優選地建設，妥善審理與國際貿易有關的重大知識產權糾紛，營造公開透明的法治環境和平等競爭的市場環境，積極服務高水平對外開放。2022 年，全國法院審結涉外知識產權一審案件近 9000 件。最高人民法院審理馬諾婁布拉尼克與國家知識產權局等商標權無效行政糾紛案，平等保護外國當事人在先權利，西班牙駐中國大使館發函表示感謝。江蘇法院新收涉外知識產權案件 527 件，審結涉外國知名品牌商標侵權及不正當競爭糾紛案，依法適用懲罰性賠償，全額支持外方權利人 5000 萬元賠償請求。廣東法院妥善化解系列涉外標準必要專利糾紛，促成當事方

43、達成全球一攬子和解。福建廈門思明法院與一帶一路國際商事調解中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 172023/4/17 15:51:2918-中心共同設立海絲中央法務區知識產權專業調解室，拓寬涉外知識產權糾紛調解途徑。堅持人類命運共同體理念，積極參與世界知識產權組織框架下的全球知識產權治理，深化同其他國家和地區知識產權司法合作，推動完善相關國際規則和標準。參加第 3 屆中國東盟大法官論壇、中國新加坡最高法院聯合工作組第四次會議，與歐盟舉辦知識產權專門訴訟程序研討會，參加 2022 年世界知識產權組織法官論壇、替代性爭議解決機制平行論壇、執法咨詢委員會第十五屆會議，參加商務部舉辦的

44、中俄知識產權工作組第 13 次會議等會議，與香港特別行政區政府律政司共同舉辦內地與香港知識產權糾紛案件法律適用與司法合作研討會，參與世界知識產權組織國際專利案件管理司法指南中國專章的編寫和遠程教育中文項目高級課程授課。福建高院與世界知識產權組織仲裁與調解中心簽署加強知識產權領域替代性爭議解決交流與合作協議，制定配套對接工作辦法。八、發揮黨建引領作用，鍛造一流審判隊伍人民法院始終堅持以黨的政治建設為統領，堅決筑牢政治忠誠，公正廉潔司法，努力鍛造一支政治堅定、顧全大局、精通法律、熟悉技術、具有國際視野的知識產權審判隊伍。黨的二十大是在全黨全國各族人民邁上全面建設社會主義現代化國家新征程、向第二個百

45、年奮斗目標進軍的關鍵時刻召開的一次十分重要的大會，擘畫了以中國式現代化全面推進中華民族偉大中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 182023/4/17 15:51:2919-復興的宏偉藍圖，專門就加強知識產權法治保障作出部署。人民法院牢牢堅持黨對知識產權司法工作的絕對領導，堅定擁護“兩個確立”、堅決做到“兩個維護”，全面學習、全面把握、全面落實黨的二十大精神，堅持不懈用習近平新時代中國特色社會主義思想凝心鑄魂，堅持用習近平法治思想指導新時代知識產權司法，深入開展“兩個確立”主題教育，鞏固深化黨史學習教育和政法隊伍教育整頓成果，不斷推動人民法院知識產權司法審判工作實現高質量發展。嚴

46、格執行防止干預司法“三個規定”、新時代政法干警“十個嚴禁”等鐵規禁令，落實近親屬“禁業清單”，規范離任從業行為，全面準確落實司法責任制、規范司法權力運行、完善知識產權領域審判權力運行和制約監督機制，確保公正廉潔司法。不斷加大教育培訓力度，提升干警政治理論水平和業務能力素質，增強斗爭精神和斗爭本領。最高人民法院就新制定的知識產權類司法解釋和司法政策性文件召開新聞通報會，發布理解與適用文章，指導地方各級人民法院準確適用。組織力量完成中國民法典適用大全知識產權與競爭卷內容的編寫，開展裁判要旨梳理提煉工作，進一步有效指導審判實踐。四川、重慶高院與兩地?。ㄊ校z察院共同舉辦知識產權司法保護業務培訓班，指

47、導成都中院與重慶一中院共同承辦知識產權法官論壇。云南高院與省市場監管局聯合舉辦知識產權行政執法與司法保護培訓班，提升知識產權法官眼界視野。遼寧丹東中院結合邊境口岸城市特點，聯合海關開展培訓，促進知識產權審判工作人員了解國際品牌保護。中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 192023/4/17 15:51:2920-結束語2023 年是全面貫徹落實黨的二十大精神的開局之年，人民法院知識產權審判將堅持以習近平新時代中國特色社會主義思想為指導，全面貫徹落實黨的二十大和二十屆一中、二中全會精神，深入貫徹習近平法治思想，深刻領悟“兩個確立”的決定性意義，增強“四個意識”、堅定“四個自信”、

48、做到“兩個維護”，牢牢堅持黨的絕對領導，堅定不移走中國特色社會主義法治道路。緊緊圍繞“努力讓人民群眾在每一個司法案件中感受到公平正義”目標，堅持講政治顧大局、促公正提效率、重自律強隊伍，始終做到司法為民、公正司法。進一步“加強知識產權法治保障，有力支持全面創新”，營造開放、公平、公正、非歧視的科技發展環境，以及市場化、法治化、國際化一流營商環境，為全面建設社會主義現代化國家開好局起好步貢獻力量。中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 202023/4/17 15:51:2921-附件：2022 年全國法院新收知識產權案件類型與數量圖4 3 8 4 8 0 件9 4.4 1%2 0

49、6 3 4 件4.4 4%5 3 3 6 件1.1 5%民事案件行政案件刑事案件圖 12022年全國地方人民法院新收知識產權一審案件類型與數量中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 212023/4/17 15:51:3122-著作權案件商標案件專利案件競爭類案件技術合同案件其他案件03 0 0 0 06 0 0 0 09 0 0 0 01 2 0 0 0 01 5 0 0 0 01 8 0 0 0 02 1 0 0 0 02 4 0 0 0 02 7 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 03 3 0 0 0 03 6 0 0 0 02 0 2 1 年2 0 2 2 年1 1 2 4

50、 7 41 2 4 7 1 63 8 9 7 03 1 6 1 89 3 8 84 2 3 88 4 1 94 0 1 51 7 7 1 72 1 0 0 6(單位：件)3 6 0 4 8 92 5 5 6 9 3圖 22022年與2021年全國地方人民法院新收知識產權民事一審案件 數量對比著作權案件商標案件專利案件技術合同案件競爭類案件其他案件2 5 5 6 9 3 件5 8.3 1%1 1 2 4 7 4 件2 5.6 5%3 8 9 7 0 件8.8 9%4 2 3 8 件0.9 7%9 3 8 8 件2.1 4%1 7 7 1 7 件4.0 4%圖 32022年全國地方人民法院新收知識

51、產權民事一審案件類型與數量中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 222023/4/17 15:51:3123-（單位：件）專利案件商標案件著作權案件02 0 0 04 0 0 06 0 0 08 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 2 0 0 01 4 0 0 01 6 0 0 01 8 0 0 02 0 2 1 年2 0 2 2 年1 8 7 3 81 8 7 3 41 8 7 61 8 1 01 21 9圖 42022年與2021年全國地方人民法院新收知識產權行政一審案件 數量對比著作權案件1 2 件0.0 6%其他案件8 件0.0 4%專利案件 1 8 7 6 件9.0 9%商

52、標案件1 8 7 3 8 件 9 0.8 1%圖 52022年全國地方人民法院新收知識產權行政一審案件類型與數量中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 232023/4/17 15:51:3124-（單位：件）侵犯注冊商標犯罪案件侵犯著作權犯罪案件其他案件01 5 0 03 0 0 04 5 0 06 0 0 07 5 0 02 0 2 1 年2 0 2 2 年4 9 7 13 3 35 8 6 93 0 47 46 1圖 62022年與2021年全國地方人民法院新收知識產權刑事一審案件 數量對比4 9 7 1 件9 3.1 6%3 0 4 件5.7%6 1 件1.1 4%侵犯注冊

53、商標犯罪案件侵犯著作權犯罪案件其他案件圖 72022年全國地方人民法院新收知識產權刑事一審案件類型與數量中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 242023/4/17 15:51:3225-Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Chinese Courts(2022)IntroductionIn the Report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China,it was emphasized that pursuing high

54、-quality development is one of the essential requirements of the Chinese path to modernization;it was clearly defined that innovation will remain at the heart of Chinas modernization drive;and special deployment was made to strengthen the legal protection of intellectual property rights.In 2022,Chin

55、ese courts adhered to Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era,put the guiding principles from the 20th National Congress into action,and fully implemented Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law,while keeping in mind the top priorities of the country.In order to make

56、 the people feel justice has been served in each and every judicial case,Chinese 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 252023/4/17 15:51:3226-courts enhanced the sense of responsibility and mission in improving the trial of intellectual property(hereinafter“IP”)cases in the new era and continued to improve judi

57、cial protection of IP rights.I.Fully Utilized Trial Functions to Support Innovation-Driven DevelopmentIn 2022,Chinese courts focused on bolstering their trial functions,while trying various IP cases fairly and efficiently in accordance with the law.The courts newly accepted 526,165 IP cases of first

58、 instance,second instance,and remanded for retrial,and concluded 543,379 cases(including carried over cases,ditto hereinafter),a year-on-year decrease of 18.17%and 9.67%,respectively.In 2022,local peoples courts at all levels newly accepted 438,480 civil IP cases of first instance and concluded 457,

59、805,a year-on-year decrease of 20.31%and 11.25%,respectively.In these newly accepted cases,the number of patent cases increased by 23.25%to 38,970 respectively from the previous year;trademark cases dropped by 9.82%to 112,474 year on year;copyright cases decreased by 29.07%to 255,693;technology cont

60、ract cases grew by 5.55%to 4,238;competition cases increased by 11.51%to 9,388;other cases of civil IP disputes fell by 15.66%to 17,717 year on year.中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 262023/4/17 15:51:3227-In 2022,local courts newly accepted 46,524 civil IP cases of second instance,down 5.22%year on year,an

61、d concluded 46,563,up 2.41%on a year-on-year basis.The Supreme Peoples Court newly accepted 3,786 civil IP cases and concluded 3,073,a year-on-year drop of 10.77%and 13.61%,respectively.In 2022,local courts newly accepted 20,634 administrative IP cases of first instance and concluded 17,630,a year-o

62、n-year increase of 0.35%and decrease of 8.85%,respectively.Among those newly accepted cases,the number of patent cases increased by 3.65%to 1,876,trademark cases grew by 4 to 18,738,and copyright cases fell by 7 to 12.In addition,local courts newly accepted 5,897 administrative IP cases of second in

63、stance and concluded 7,285,down 28.22%and 1.79%respectively compared to 2021.Of those cases,5,518 were sustained,1,650 were reversed,3 were remanded for retrial,78 were withdrawn,10 were dismissed,and 26 were resolved in other means.The Supreme Peoples Court newly accepted 1,456 administrative IP ca

64、ses,a drop of 48.95%compared to 2021,and concluded 1,542,down 38%year on year.Local courts newly accepted 5,336 criminal IP infringement cases of first instance and concluded 5,456,down 14.98%and 9.76%respectively.In particular,4,971 trademark infringement criminal cases were newly accepted,and 5,09

65、9 were concluded,a year-中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 272023/4/17 15:51:3228-on-year drop of 15.3%and 9.86%,respectively;304 copyright infringement criminal cases were newly accepted,and 302 were concluded,down 8.71%and 7.93%.Other criminal cases newly accepted reached 61,and 55 were concluded,down 13 a

66、nd 6 respectively compare to the figures of 2021.Local courts newly accepted 979 criminal IP cases of second instance and concluded 977,a decrease of 6.76%and 2.01%compared to 2021,respectively.In 2022,IP cases accepted by Chinese courts are mainly characterized by the following features:The number

67、of technology-related cases continued to increase,the demand for IPR protection in central and western China was high,and the importance of IPR judicial services to high-quality development was emphasized further.In 2022,the IP Court of the Supreme Peoples Court continued to accepted a significant n

68、umber of new civil non-procedural cases in second instance involving technical IPRs.Significantly more case of first instance involving patent and technology contract were accepted by local peoples courts at all levels.Courts in Jiangsu province newly accepted 1,817 new cases of disputes over owners

69、hip and infringement of technical IP rights,a 17.61%increase from the previous year.Year-on-year,the number of new IPR cases received by the courts in Shanxi province and Hainan province rose by 22.21%and 72.58%,respectively.中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 282023/4/17 15:51:3229-In Hebei province,the numb

70、er of IP cases newly accepted and concluded by local courts increased by 45.94%and 106.01%year on year.The number of new civil IPR cases received in courts of Liaoning province increased by 61%annually.The number of new civil IPR cases of first instance accepted by courts in Jiangxi province increas

71、ed by 22%compared to 2021.In addition,the number of cases accepted by the courts in Hunan province,Heilongjiang province,and the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps(hereinafter,referred to as“XPCC”)also continued to grow steadily.The Internet online trial mechanism for IP cases continued to s

72、ee innovations,the development of smart court architecture was fostered,and the mechanism for convenience and benefit of the judiciary improved.Online trial platforms were leveraged by local courts to facilitate online court hearings,services,and other legal processes of IP cases,which shortened the

73、 duration of litigation and reduced litigation costs.For instance,courts in Shanghai accepted 38,505 IP cases online,with over 20,000 online court hearings and meetings and more than 170,000 electronic services.Courts in Henan province recorded an online filing rate of over 90%,with 16,023 IP first

74、instance cases were filed online.In Qinghai,the online filing rate for IP cases reached 62.7%,with 898 electronic services were conducted via the service platform.In Guangxi,the Intermediate Peoples Court of Guigang utilized digital 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 292023/4/17 15:51:3230-technology to have

75、 approximately 70%of all accepted IP cases filed online annually.The Qingdao Intellectual Property Court developed an online asynchronous evidence cross-examination system,which enabled relevant parties to upload electronic evidence online and complete cross-examination,thereby streamlining pre-tria

76、l procedures.The substantive resolution of disputes by Chinese courts continued to be strengthened,and the protection of the rights and interests of rights holders became more comprehensive,increased public satisfaction with the judicial protection of IP rights.Local Chinese courts mediated and reso

77、lved 44,155 civil IP cases of first instance,a mediation and resolution rate of 9.64%,up 0.78%compared to 2021.Additionally,2,894 civil IP cases of second instance were mediated and resolved at a rate of 6.22%,an increase of 0.57%from the previous year.Notably,the rates of mediation and withdrawal o

78、f IP cases recorded by courts in Tianjin,as well as Hebei,Guangdong,and Heilongjiang provinces were particularly high,reaching 75.51%,73.48%,52.94%,and 66.6%,respectively.The high rates of withdrawal reflect the effective reduction of the burden on litigants and the complete maintenance of social st

79、ability and harmony.Courts in Jiangsu province heard 97 IP cases in which punitive damages were applied,up 21.25%year on year;the Primary Peoples Court of Pudong New Area of Shanghai applied punitive damages 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 302023/4/17 15:51:3231-in 25 cases;a total of 169 million yuan was

80、 awarded as punitive damages for 29 IP cases heard by the Intermediate Peoples Court of Shenzhen;local courts in Hunan province conducted a special judicial campaign and concluded 3,796 cases involving IP rights,with 60.4315 million yuan awarded;in Guangdong province,less than 20%of civil IP cases a

81、ccepted by local courts resulted in forced enforcement,with a 98%enforcement and closing rate.In response to IP infringement in critical areas influencing peoples livelihoods,such as food and drug production,courts in Jiangsu province issued nearly one hundred orders prohibiting the relevant entitie

82、s from engaging in the specified industry.According to the relevant applications,the Intermediate Peoples Court of Guiyang in Guizhou province heard 25 IP preservation cases and froze properties worth 40.1 million yuan last year.The cost of IP infringement increased dramatically,and rights holders w

83、ere effectively compensated for their losses.More cases were accepted by courts at lower levels.The quality and effectiveness of IP case trials have improved as a result of jurisdiction diversity of intermediate and high courts.In Jiangsu province,primary peoples courts heard 65.25%of all IP cases i

84、n the province,an increase of 10.52%year on year.Meanwhile,the proportion of cases heard by intermediate and high courts dropped to 31.56%and 3.19%,respectively.Similarly,in Chongqing,the 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 312023/4/17 15:51:3232-number of IP cases newly accepted by primary peoples courts acc

85、ounted for 75.2%of all IP cases in the city,up 28.1%compared to 2021;the proportion of cases heard by intermediate and high courts,in contrast,decreased by 29.9%to 21.3%and increased by 1.8%to 3.5%,respectively.This demonstrates the gradual formation of a“pyramid”pattern with respect to the trial of

86、 IP cases.Of the first-instance civil IP cases concluded by local courts,320 cases were concluded under the elevated jurisdiction of higher courts,more than three times the figure in 2021.63 civil IP cases were submitted to a higher-level court in Jiangxi province,and 15 such cases that were submitt

87、ed to a higher court in Guangdong province due to their novelty,complexity,or guiding significance in law application,thus effectively promoting the uniformity of judicial rules.II.Encouraged and Assured Scientific and Technological Innovation to Promote Self-reliance and StrengthSpeeding up efforts

88、 to achieve greater self-reliance and strength in science and technology is the path China must take to advance high-quality development.Chinese courts maximized the role speeding up efforts to achieve greater self-reliance and strength in science and technology is the path China must take to advanc

89、e high-quality development.Chinese courts maximized the role of IP trials in 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 322023/4/17 15:51:3233-fostering and safeguarding scientific and technological innovation.Chinese courts provided high-quality judicial services to support basic research,protected original and pio

90、neering scientific and technological advances,and eliminated obstacles that impeded high-quality development.1.The Chinese Judiciary Continued to Promote the Unification of Judicial Standards in Technology-Related CasesConcentrating on bolstering IP protection,Chinese courts conducted a more stringe

91、nt examination of the legitimacy of administrative acts pertaining to patent granting and rights reexamination and promoted the application of unified administrative and judicial standards,thereby enhancing the quality of patent granting and rights reexamination.In 2022,Chinese courts maximized thei

92、r responsibilities in rule-setting and value guidance for protecting achievements of scientific and technological innovation,summarized and proposed new judicial protection rules,and encouraged the continuous innovation and upgrading of technologies and industries.the Supreme Peoples Court reasonabl

93、y defined the trial functions of courts at four levels and specified that cases involving ownership and infringement disputes related to invention patents,utility model patents,new plant varieties,integrated circuit layout designs,trade secrets,and computer software shall be centrally 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況

94、（2022）.indd 332023/4/17 15:51:3234-adjudicated by the intellectual property courts,intermediate peoples courts of provincial capitals,and intermediate peoples courts designated by the Supreme Peoples Court.This effectively promoted the nationwide application of consistent judicial standards in techn

95、ology-related cases and improved judicial protection of significant scientific and technological innovations.The Supreme Peoples Court released the Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases and 50 Typical Intellectual Property Cases in 2021,including 11 technology-related cases involving infringement of te

96、chnology secrets,plant variety rights,and invention patents,which provided useful guidance for trial practices.In addition,the Supreme Peoples Court conducted research on the implementation of judicial interpretations such as Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Tria

97、l of Civil Cases involving Patent Disputes Related to Drugs Applied for Registration in order to quickly summarize the trial experience.In the trial of the patent right ownership dispute over the“dust removal device and system for gasification furnaces”,the Supreme Peoples Court defined the right ba

98、sis for the source party and the technology improvement party.In the trial of the administrative dispute over the invalidity of the patent rights between Qilu Pharmaceutical and Sihuan Pharmaceutical,the judicial standards for the creativity of drug patents and adequate disclosure in specifications

99、were clarified.In the trial 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 342023/4/17 15:51:3235-of the infringement dispute over the utility model patent rights of the“integral geocell”,it was determined whether the defense concerning a legitimate source complied with reasonable diligence requirements.2.Chinese Courts

100、 Committed to Facilitate and Protect Basic Research and Original InnovationBased on the requirement that the frontier science and technology in the world should be integrated with the major national strategic needs,economic and social development goals and the livelihoods and wellbeing of the people

101、,Chinese courts intensified IP protection in key areas,core technologies,and emerging industries.Meanwhile,the courts worked to ensure the legitimate rights and interests of innovators and provided judicial services to achieve breakthroughs in core technologies.The Supreme Peoples Court implemented

102、the arrangements of the Party Central Committee on the revitalization of the seed industry and issued the Guiding Opinions on Protecting the Intellectual Property Rights of the Seed Industry,Combating Infringement of Counterfeit and inferior goods,and Creating a Good Environment for the Revitalizati

103、on of the Seed Industry jointly with the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs and other departments.In addition,the Supreme Peoples Court released the second group of model cases from Chinese courts 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 352023/4/17 15:51:3336-regarding judicial protection of IP rights in t

104、he seed industry,supported the establishment of the Base of Chinese Courts for the IP Protection in Germplasm Resource Research(Hainan),and held the Seminar of Judicial Protection for IP Rights in Germplasm Resource for the first time in the name of the Base.The case of the“Jinjing 818”rice plant va

105、riety infringement was selected as one of the“Top Ten Cases of Promoting the progress of the Rule of Law in the New Era in 2021.”The Supreme Peoples Court concluded Chinas first drug patent linkage lawsuit,which was nominated as one of the“Top Ten Cases of Promoting the progress of the Rule of Law i

106、n the New Era in 2022”and accelerated to shape and improve the drug patent linkage system.During the two related cases of patent and technology secret infringement involving“melamine,”the defendants were ordered to compensate the rights holders for a total of 218 million yuan in economic losses with

107、 several and joint liabilities,which reflects the judicial goal of vigorously protecting technological innovation.During the trial of the technology secret infringement case of“oil and gas microorganism exploration”,the Supreme Peoples Court delivered a strong signal to improve the protection of tec

108、hnology secrets.The High Peoples Court of Jiangsu Province,along with the competent provincial departments,signed a memorandum of understanding on“Building Strong Industrial Chains via IP Protection and Developing an Independent and Self-中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 362023/4/17 15:51:3337-controlled Mo

109、dern Industrial System,”which established a working mechanism to develop the key industrial chains.The Suzhou Intellectual Property Court facilitated a package settlement between the parties in a invention patent infringement dispute involving a US corporation,effectively protecting the legitimate r

110、ights and interests of innovators.The Hefei Intellectual Property Court met with administrative and law enforcement agencies as well as companies based in Anhui Province,to solicit and respond to commercial innovators for rights protection.III.Increased the Judicial Protection of Trademarks to Enabl

111、e the Growth of Successful Brands Chinese courts continued to strengthen the judicial protection of trademark rights,improved the trial quality of administrative cases on trademark registration and review,as well as civil cases on trademarks,and upheld the order of trademark application,registration

112、,and use.They directed rights holders to register trademarks in compliance with the law,regulated the use of trademarks,and upheld the rule of law on the market,thereby encouraging the growth of successful Chinese brands in the new era.中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 372023/4/17 15:51:3338-1.Chinese Court

113、s Improved the Quality of Trademark Registration and ReviewIn order to improve the trial quality of administrative cases involving trademark registration and review,steps have been taken to crack down on malicious trademark registration for the non-purpose of use.The boundaries and protective scopes

114、 of trademark rights were reasonably defined,and normalized,standardized procedures for trademark application and registration were promoted.The Supreme Peoples Court and China National Intellectual Property Administration co-hosted a symposium to solicit opinions from courts across the country and

115、provide sound suggestions and references for legislation work such as the revision of trademark laws and the legislation of geographical indications,as well as to promote the continuous improvement of the legal system for trademark regulations,which further improved the rules for trademark registrat

116、ion and review.The administrative case concluded by the Supreme Peoples Court regarding the invalidation of the trademark“Chen Mahua”was selected as one of the“Top Ten Cases of Promoting the progress of the Rule of Law in the New Era in 2022”,which provided effective guidance for rulings of trademar

117、ks lacking distinctive features.The criteria for determining the distinctiveness of English trademarks were clarified during the retrial of the denied“BIODERMA”trademark application.In 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 382023/4/17 15:51:3339-the case regarding the invalidation of the“Youlian”trademark,it wa

118、s stated that trademarks violated the principle of good faith and failed to reasonably avoid prior registered trademarks should not be registered.Beijing High Peoples Court established two distinct teams to try administrative trademark rejection review cases and administrative cases proceeding invol

119、ving regular trademarks.This facilitated the intensive case management and reduced the average review time for administrative trademark rejection review cases to 35 days,making it possible to“quickly try simple cases,and scrutinize complicated cases.”2.Chinese Courts Strengthened the Judicial Protec

120、tion of TrademarksPeoples courts continued to strengthen the role of trademark using in determining the scope of trademark right protection and encouraged trademark owners to use trademarks in practice continuously to give full play to the identification function of trademarks,while protecting the l

121、egitimate rights and interests of consumers.In accordance with the law,the judicial protection of well-known trademarks,traditional brands,and time-honored brands was strengthened,and the development of brands was encouraged.The rules and regulations for protecting geographical indications were impr

122、oved,and infringement on geographical 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 392023/4/17 15:51:3340-indication rights were curtailed.During the trademark infringement case trial of the“Nanmiao”tofu,the Supreme Peoples Court protected the legitimate use of the geographical name in the registered trademark by othe

123、r operators.In the“Yipinshi”trademark infringement case trial,the abusive use of rights by maliciously obtaining trademarks and initiating infringement lawsuits was halted in accordance with the law.The organizing committee of the Beijing Winter Olympics and Paralympic Winter Olympics sent a letter

124、of appreciation to Beijing High Peoples Court and the Beijing Intellectual Property Court for supporting the protection of Olympic brands.The High Peoples Court of Sichuan Province heard the“Qinhuajiao(green pepper)”trademark infringement case in accordance with the law,maintained the order of trade

125、mark usage,and safeguarded ethical business practices.To enhance judicial protection of geographical indications,the High Peoples Court of Zhejiang Province launched a major research project initiative on the judicial protection of trademarks with geographical indications to enhance judicial protect

126、ion of geographical indications.The Intellectual Property Court of Hainan Free Trade Port conducted research to develop a guide for judicial protection of geographical indications,exploring the integration of IP protection and rural revitalization.Beijing Xicheng District Peoples Court visited time-

127、honored brands within its jurisdiction and established a IP cases 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 402023/4/17 15:51:3341-trial supervisory mechanism to promote time-honored brands rejuvenation.IV.Strengthened Copyright Trials to Contribute to the Building of a Country with a Strong Culture Peoples courts

128、fully leveraged the guiding role of copyright trials in promoting outstanding culture,strengthened protection of copyright and related rights,promoted the development of culture and science,and contributed to the building of a socialist country with a strong culture.1.Chinese Courts Vigorously Promo

129、ted Advanced Socialist CultureChinese courts continued to be dedicated to promoting advanced socialist culture based on their functions in judicial trials.They also facilitated the creative transformation and innovative development of fine traditional Chinese culture,and sparked the creative vitalit

130、y for cultural innovation and creation,thereby bolstering the cultural-ethical driving force necessary to realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.Chinese courts heard cases involving the inheritance of classic Chinese revolutionary works and the protection of the legitimate rights and i

131、nterests of heroes,heroines and martyrs according to the law,while vigorously promoting the core socialist 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 412023/4/17 15:51:3342-values.Copyright protection for genetic resources,traditional culture,traditional knowledge,and folk art was intensified to promote the consolid

132、ation and utilization of intangible cultural heritage.Chinese courts prioritized copyright protection in new areas such as live streaming,short videos,animation and games,and cultural creativity,clamping down on piracy and plagiarism while promoting the prosperous development of cultural undertaking

133、s and industries.To improve the market environment for digital culture,courts in Beijing,Tianjin,and Shanghai,issued injunctions against behaviors such as the piracy of the Beijing Winter Olympics and the Qatar World Cup.The Suqian Intermediate Peoples Court of Jiangsu Province analyzed the characte

134、ristics of local book piracy cases and submitted judicial recommendations to the administrative authority,which effectively reduced book infringements and piracies.The Intermediate Peoples Court of Qinzhou,Guangxi,concluded a cross-provincial copyright infringement crime case involving the sale of p

135、irated textbooks and reference books,which was selected as one of the Top Ten Typical Cases of Youth Copyright Protection in 2022.The Beijing Internet Court has released version 2.0 of the Tianping Blockchain-Copyright Chain co-governance platform,which achieved full coverage of digital copyright ri

136、ghts confirmation,authorization,transaction,and protection,thereby promoting the development of the copyright market in a healthy and orderly manner.The Quanzhou 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 422023/4/17 15:51:3343-Dehua Peoples Court in Fujian province established a“1-2-3-4”protection mechanism targeti

137、ng ceramic IP rights to address 4 main challenges:evidence preservation,law enforcement&supervision,social recognition,and dispute resolution,which was formally acknowledged by the World Intellectual Property Organization(WIPO).2.Chinese Courts Enhanced Judicial Protection of Copyright in the New Er

138、aPeoples courts fully implemented the Copyright Law to protect copyright and related rights.The Supreme Peoples Court continued to summarize judicial experiences and conducted researches jointly with local courts,and drafted judicial interpretations of the Copyright Law to solve challenging legal is

139、sues in the field of copyright trials.The Supreme Peoples Court heard and reversed the judgment on the copyright infringement case of the“Big-Headed Kid”artwork,which clarified the rules for determining copyright ownership and achieved positive social effects.In a case involving the jurisdiction que

140、ry for the infringement of the right to disseminate works over the Internet,the Supreme Peoples Court specified the jurisdiction of civil cases involving such infringement and the judicial interpretation application standards,providing sound guidance for copyright trial practices.Beijing High People

141、s Court provided a 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 432023/4/17 15:51:3344-reply on determining the royalty standards for image infringement cases,which promoted the adoption of consistent judicial standards concerning similar cases in its jurisdiction.In Hubei province,local courts promoted the use of sta

142、ndardized table judgment in copyright cases,which significantly shortened the trial term.Sichuan High Peoples Court and Chongqing High Peoples Court jointly issued minutes to unify the judicial standards concerning infringement cases of the right to disseminate information over the Internet in their

143、 jurisdictions.Heilongjiang High Peoples Court,along with 9 other government departments included the Heilongjiang Provincial Copyright Administration,jointly signed a notice to crack down on violations of the Copyright Law to strengthen criminal protection of copyright.Beijing Intellectual Property

144、 Court made well-coordinated efforts and mediated a series of lawsuits between companies regarding copyright infringement of Chinese academic literature network databases,settled over 1,000 cases in the city and properly resolving potential disputes.V.Maintained a Sound Legal Environment for Competi

145、tion to Stimulate Innovation and CreativityPeoples courts continued to enhance anti-monopoly and anti-unfair competition judicial efforts.By strengthening the fundamental status 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 442023/4/17 15:51:3345-of competition policies,maintained a sound legal environment for fair mar

146、ket competition,optimized the business environment,in order to make contribution to the development of a sound system of socialist market economy.1.Anti-Monopoly and Anti-Unfair Competition Judicial Efforts ImprovedIn 2022,Peoples courts continued to improve the application rules in the field of com

147、petition,strengthened judicial trials concerning unfair competition,and maintained the rule of law in market competition.The Supreme Peoples Court issued the Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the Peoples Republic of China,which provided

148、 detailed rules regarding the Anti-Unfair Competition Law,including its General Provisions and articles on counterfeiting and confusion,false publicity,commercial defamation,and unfair competition on the internet,etc.Furthermore,the document also unified the relevant judicial standards and responded

149、 to the judicial needs arising from new fields and new business practices.The Supreme Peoples Court researched and drafted new judicial interpretations on anti-monopoly civil litigation,solicited public opinions,and improved judicial rules for anti-monopoly cases,while clarifying the judicial standa

150、rds for determining monopolistic behaviors.The 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 452023/4/17 15:51:3346-Supreme Peoples Court held a press conference on Chinese courts strengthening judicial practice of anti-monopoly and anti-unfair competition,The Court released 10 typical cases for each category to enhanc

151、e the public legal awareness for respecting and protecting fair competition.Additionally,the press conference also guided courts at all levels to punish monopolistic behaviors and maintain the market order for fair competition.Peoples courts at all levels enhanced judicial efforts in key fields and

152、critical junctures such as platform economies,core technologies,medicine,and communication,cracked down on monopolistic agreements,as well as exclusive and restrictive competition behaviors with the abuse of market dominance.Chinese courts also refined the criteria for identifying monopolistic behav

153、iors involving internet platforms,specified the rules for determining unfair competition behaviors such as traffic hijacking and interference,and regulated and directed capital operation in healthy manner in accordance with the law.During the trial of the“Zhang Bainian”case of trademark infringement

154、 and unfair competition dispute and the Bairui Runxing case of unfair competition dispute,the Supreme Peoples Court clearly stated the responsibilities of sellers in disputes related to unfair competition.In the“kindergarten”case concerning horizontal monopoly agreements and the case involving the a

155、buse of market dominance by public utility companies in relation to water supply and drainage,the 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 462023/4/17 15:51:3347-Supreme Peoples Court responded to public concerns regarding market competition behaviors that affect peoples livelihood and promptly forbidden exclusive

156、 and restrictive behaviors in competition,ensured that the public benefit from fair competition.2.Healthy Development of the Digital Economy Promoted in Accordance with the LawEfforts were made to explore and strengthen judicial protection of IP rights in the digital economy field,provide robust jud

157、icial services and guarantees to fully leverage the function of data,and improve the efficiency of data governance,thereby promoting high-quality development of the digital economy.Chinese courts improved hearings of cases involving data cloud storage,open-source data,data ownership,data trading,dat

158、a services,and unfair competition in data markets to effectively maintain data security.In addition,research was carried out on IP rights judicial protection of data rights,as well as fair competition in the era of the digital economy,and local courts were guided to explore trial models catering to

159、the demand of the digital economy and promote the judicial protection of innovative achievements in the digital economy.During the trial of the“web crawler platform data”case of technology secret infringement,the Supreme Peoples Court specified that platform data can be protected as technology secre

160、ts,which strengthened the 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 472023/4/17 15:51:3348-protection of data rights and interests with competitive advantages and values created by platform operators through legitimate business operations.Jiangxi High Peoples Court produced opinions on IP judicial services to safeg

161、uard the development of the digital economy and proposed 13 measures of services and guarantees.Shenzhen Intermediate Peoples Court of Guangdong province issued implementation opinions on enhancing judicial protection of IP rights in the digital economy,contributing to the high-quality development o

162、f the digital economy within the city.Beijing Intellectual Property Court concluded research including Research on Judicial Rules Regarding Competition Behaviors in New Business Practices and Models in the Digital Economy,properly closed multiple data infringement cases,continued to explore judicial

163、 rules where the Anti-unfair Competition Law is applied to protect data.VI.Deepened Judicial Reforms to Improve Efficiency and Quality of IPRs ProtectionThe judicial reform in IP domain was deepened by peoples courts,by continuing to improve the specialized trial system for IP cases,strengthening th

164、e IP litigation system,and deepening the“three-in-one”reform of IP trials.These efforts helped unify the legal application standards,enhanced diversified resolution of disputes,中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 482023/4/17 15:51:3349-and improved the coordination between administrative enforcement and judic

165、ial practice,thereby enabling the comprehensive improvement of judicial protection for IP rights.1.Promoted the Modernization of the Trial System to Boost Judicial CapacityLed by the IP trial department of the Supreme Peoples Court and backed by IP divisions of local courts,Chinas specialized IP tri

166、al framework with 4 demonstrating IP courts and 27 IP divisions of local intermediate peoples courts as the focuses,saw further improvement.The Supreme Peoples Court issued Several Provisions on the Jurisdiction of Civil and Administrative Intellectual Property Cases of First Instance,as well as its

167、 associated documents:Notice of Issuing the Standards for Civil and Administrative Intellectual Property Cases of First Instance under Jurisdiction of Primary Peoples Courts,and Notice Regarding Issues Concerning the Appellate Jurisdiction of Cases Involving Disputes over Invention Patent and Other

168、Intellectual Property Contracts.The documents established a judicial protection system with sound jurisdictional rules,reasonably defined the trial functions of courts at four levels,and optimized the allocation of trial resources.Currently,558 primary courts,including Internet courts,have jurisdict

169、ion over civil IP cases.Meanwhile,the Supreme Peoples Court continued to improve the appellate mechanism 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 492023/4/17 15:51:3450-of IP cases at the national level,upgraded the retrial application procedures of IP cases,and intensified supervision and guiding to ensure the co

170、nsistent application of the relevant laws and regulations.Local courts leveraged trial resources and jurisdictional mechanisms by elevating jurisdiction in accordance with the law to enable the efficient trial of IP cases and fully safeguard the rights and interests of the parties involved.The Supre

171、me Peoples Court strengthened its guiding efforts to promote the“three-in-one”trial mechanism reform of civil,administrative,and criminal IP cases across 25 high courts,236 intermediate courts,and 275 primary courts nationwide.In particular,10 courts have achieved full coverage of the“three-in-one”t

172、rial mechanism for IP cases within their jurisdiction.the Supreme Peoples Court conducted research to formulate normative documents on IP cases and issued the Interpretation on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in the Handling of Criminal Cases Involving Infringement on Intellectual P

173、roperty Rights(SOLICIT OPINION DRAFT)jointly with the Supreme Peoples Procuratorate to solicit opinions from the public.Working with the relevant departments,Heilongjiang High Peoples Court named the divisions which receive IP cases as IP divisions in the intermediate and primary courts,distributed

174、implementation plans which guidelined the practical effect of the“three-in-one”中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 502023/4/17 15:51:3451-reform.High courts in provinces including Anhui,Zhejiang,Henan,and Qinghai jointly issued guiding documents with the relevant provincial procuratorates and public security

175、departments to improve jurisdiction over criminal IP cases,which established clear procedures and sound coordination mechanisms,thereby fully implementing the“three-in-one”reform target.Chinese courts continued to improve the diversified technical fact-finding mechanism,and improved the“Database of

176、Technical Investigation Talent for Chinese Courts”,with more than 500 technical investigators added to the Database.Additionally,the nationwide on-demand deployment and talent sharing mechanism saw continued improvements,effectively addressing the difficulties in ascertaining the facts of technology

177、-related cases.High courts in regions such as Guangxi and Tibet introduced regulations on the engagement of technical investigators in IP cases and improved their institutional mechanisms according to local realities.Moreover,the IP courts in Nanjing and Suzhou fully leveraged the function of techni

178、cal investigators by participated in the fact-finding investigation of 751 technology-related cases,conducted 66 inspections and preservations,and attended 490 trials and court hearings,with 388 technical investigation reports issued.Peoples courts enhanced judicial protection of IP rights.The 中國法院知

179、識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 512023/4/17 15:51:3452-Supreme Peoples Court issued the Opinions on Strengthening Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights of Traditional Chinese Medicine to facilitate the inheritance and innovative development of traditional Chinese medicine.Focusing on the characte

180、ristics of IP litigation,Chinese courts conducted researches to formulate specialized procedures law for IP lawsuits.Efforts were made to curb the abuse of rights and strengthen the protection of rights holders through specialized research on regulating malicious IP litigation and the accurate appli

181、cation of punitive damages.Shanghai High Peoples Court issued opinions on handling IP cases involving small amounts to optimize and adjust the procedures for IP litigation and to try simple cases quickly and tough ones delicately.Guidelines for the application of punitive damages were drafted or iss

182、ued by high courts and intermediate courts in Beijing,Shandong,Guangdong,XPCC,Inner Mongolia,and other regions,with typical cases published to promote the accurate implementation of the punitive damages system in accordance with the law.2.Contributed to the Building of an Overarching IP Protection F

183、rameworkChinese courts continued to improve the coordination between judicial trials and administrative law enforcement to enable the unification of judicial and enforcement standards.The Supreme 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 522023/4/17 15:51:3453-Peoples Court,jointly with government departments inclu

184、ding the Supreme Peoples Procuratorate,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Ministry of Commerce,Ministry of Culture and Tourism,State Administration for Market Regulation,China National Intellectual Property Administration,and National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine,improved co

185、ordination mechanisms and promoted institutional exchanges,data exchange,and information sharing.Additionally,the Supreme Peoples Court released the Opinions on Strengthening Intellectual Property Appraisal jointly with departments including China National Intellectual Property Administration and th

186、e Supreme Peoples Procuratorate to deepen cooperation between law enforcement departments and judicial organs in the field of IP identification.The Supreme Peoples Court and China National Intellectual Property Administration co-released the Opinions on Strengthening the Coordinated Protection of In

187、tellectual Property,including 13 specific measures to improve the coordination between administrative protection and judicial protection of IP rights.The High Peoples Court of Shaanxi Province led the establishment of the Qinchuangyuan Intellectual Property Judicial Protection Center,involving 13 pr

188、ovincial-level government organs and academic institutions.The Center features a joint meeting system and offers a platform for cooperation.The Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court,Shanghai Intellectual Property Court,中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 532023/4/17 15:51:3454-worked with China National Intel

189、lectual Property Administration,to explore the synchronization of administrative patent re-examination and infringement disputes hearings,shortening the trial cycle of patent infringement cases to improve patent protection.Chinese courts accelerated the building of a diversified settlement mechanism

190、 for IP disputes,fully implemented the“head office to head office”working mechanism for the online connection between litigations and mediations,improved the system for the judicial confirmation of administrative mediation agreements,and built a joint force for protecting IP rights.Mediation organiz

191、ations focusing on IP cases achieved full coverage in 30 regions across the country,with continued growth in the number of mediation organizations and mediators.Peoples courts entrusted more than 90,000 IP disputes to pre-litigation mediation organizations,with a success rate of over 80%,effectively

192、 resolving IP disputes in China.The Supreme Peoples Court intensified communication with departments including the National Copyright Administration,China Writers Association,and China Federation of Literary and Art Circles to promote the establishment of a“head office to head office”mechanism for t

193、he online connection between complaints and mediations in the field of copyright protection.Notably,the High Peoples Court of Hebei province and Hebei Provincial Admiration for Market Regulation signed the 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 542023/4/17 15:51:3455-Memorandum of Cooperation on the Judicial Con

194、firmation of Administrative Mediation Agreements for Intellectual Property Disputes,which facilitated the resolution of 5 patent disputes through the mechanism.Courts in Shandong province handled 146 cases involving the judicial confirmation of administrative mediation agreements for IPRs disputes.T

195、he High Peoples Court of Liaoning Province and the Liaoning Intellectual Property Office,co-issued the Notice on Establishing a Mechanism for the Online Connection Between Complaints and Mediations Involving Intellectual Property Disputes.After 11 mediation organizations set up,110 mediators station

196、ed and successfully mediated 2,834 IP disputes,a success rate of 96.29%.Heilongjiang High Peoples Court and the Department of Justice of Heilongjiang Province co-founded an intellectual property arbitration court and issued the Notice on Properly Handling Arbitration and Preservation Cases in Accord

197、ance with the Law,which facilitated the integration of litigation,arbitration,and mediation,while strengthening well-coordinated governance.The Supreme Peoples Court endeavored to build regional mechanisms for IP protection,strengthen the development of IP integrity systems,and expand the promotion

198、of the rule of law for the judicial protection of IP.The Court continued to guide relative courts to empower the coordinated development of the Beijing-Tianjin-中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 552023/4/17 15:51:3456-Hebei region,the development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt,the integrated development

199、of the Yangtze River Delta,the building of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area,the full revitalization of Northeast China,and the building of the Hainan Free Trade Port,and the development of the Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle,thereby enabling well-coordinated regional innovation.The h

200、igh peoples courts of Hunan,Hubei,and Jiangxi province established a cooperative working mechanism for trials in city clusters along the middle reaches of the Yangtze River.Under their guidance,intermediate courts in cities including Yueyang,Xianning,and Jiujiang signed cross-regional IP protection

201、agreements with the competent market regulation departments to explore solutions to new challenges in cross-regional,large-scale,and collective IP infringement.The high peoples courts of Sichuan province and Chongqing jointly held the 2022 Sichuan-Chongqing Intellectual Property Protection Seminar t

202、o enable the integrated protection of IP rights in both regions.Beijing Intellectual Property Court,the Third Intermediate Court of Tianjin,and the Intermediate Court of Xiongan New Area signed the Cooperation Framework Agreement on Strengthening Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property,a move t

203、hat promoted cooperation including talent training,trial collaboration,and experience sharing.The Intellectual Property Court of the Hainan Free Trade Port sent 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 562023/4/17 15:51:3457-judicial recommendations to the Hainan Administration for Market Regulation and the Intell

204、ectual Property Office of Hainan Province,publicly listing 12 individuals involved in 9 criminal cases of IP infringement as serious violators of IP laws.The Intermediate Court of Dalian in Liaoning Province sent judicial recommendations to the local administration for market regulation,publicly dis

205、closing the information of 4 entities involved in intentional IP infringement.The Peoples Court of Binhai New Area in Tianjin adopted new regulations to report persons subject to execution in IP cases who failed to fulfill their obligations to departments for market regulation,financial institutions

206、,and industry associations.During Intellectual Property Promotion Week,the Supreme Peoples Court held a press conference and planned a series of events to showcase the achievements of Chinese courts in providing judicial protection for IPRs from all angles,perspectives and depths.Courts in regions i

207、ncluding Jilin,Gansu,Qinghai,Ningxia,and XPCC released well-planned typical cases and conducted events such as public hearings and public enforcement to encourage the general public to respect and protect IP rights.中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 572023/4/17 15:51:3458-VII.Upheld the Legal Equality in IPR

208、s Protection and Promoted International Communication and CooperationChinese courts made greater efforts to establish China as a preferred venue for international IP litigation,properly tried major IP disputes related to international trade,and created an open,transparent judicial environment,as wel

209、l as a sound market environment for fair competition,thereby contributing to a greater degree of opening up.In 2022,Chinese courts concluded nearly 9,000 IP cases of first instance involving foreign parties.During the trialing of administrative dispute case between Manolo Blahnik and China National

210、Intellectual Property Administration regarding the invalidity of trademark rights,the Supreme Peoples Court equally protected the prior rights of the foreign party and received a letter of appreciation from the Spanish Embassy in China.Courts in Jiangsu newly accepted 527 IP cases involving foreign

211、parties,with a trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute involving a well-known foreign brand concluded in which punitive damages was awarded in accordance with the law,and upheld the foreign rights holders claim for compensation of 50 million yuan.In Guangdong,courts resolved a series o

212、f standard essential patent 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 582023/4/17 15:51:3459-disputes involving foreign parties and assisted the parties reach global package settlement via mediation.The Peoples Court of Siming in Xiamen,Fujian province,and the International Commercial Mediation Center for BRI estab

213、lished the“Intellectual Property Mediation Room of the Maritime Silk Road Central Legal District”,expanding the channel for mediating IP disputes involving foreign parties jointly.Committed to building a community with a shared future for humanity,Chinese courts actively engaged in global IP governa

214、nce under the framework of the WIPO in 2022,deepened judicial IP cooperation with other nations and regions,and pushed for the improvement of international rules and standards on IP rights.The Supreme Peoples Court sent judges to participated in the Third China-ASEAN Justice Forum and the Fourth Ses

215、sion for the China-Singapore Supreme Courts Joint Working Group,and co-organized with the European Union the Seminar on Specialized Litigation Procedures for IP Cases.Judges were also sent to attended conferences including the 2022 WIPO Intellectual Property Judges Forum,the WIPO Assemblies Side Eve

216、nt:WIPO ADR for IPOs and Courts,the Fifteenth Session of the Advisory Committee on Enforcement(ACE),as well as the 13th Meeting of the Russia-China Working Group on Cooperation in Protection of IPRs,which was organized by the Ministry of Commerce of China.In addition,中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 592023

217、/4/17 15:51:3460-the Supreme Peoples Court co-organized the Seminar on the Legal Application and Judicial Cooperation in IP Cases between Chinas Mainland and Hong Kong jointly with the HKSAR Department of Justice,participated in the drafting of the China chapter of the WIPO International Patent Case

218、 Management Judicial Guide,and offered advanced courses through the WIPO Distance Learning Courses in Chinese.Fujian High Peoples Court and the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center signed the Agreement on Strengthening Communication and Cooperation on Alternative Dispute Resolution for Intellectual

219、 Property Rights and formulated the corresponding coordination and working mechanisms.VIII.Leveraged the Guiding Role of Party Building to Build a First-Class Judicial TeamCommitted to the political development of the Party,Chinese courts strengthened political loyalty,engaged in impartial and hones

220、t judicial practices,and endeavored to build an IP trial team of law and technology-savvy professionals with political integrity,big-picture thinking,and a global outlook.The 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China is a meeting of great importance.It takes place at a critical time as

221、the 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 602023/4/17 15:51:3461-entire Party and the Chinese people of all ethnic groups embark on a new journey to build China into a modern socialist country in all respects and advance toward the Second Centenary Goal.The 20th National Congress draws a grand blueprint for adv

222、ancing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation on all fronts through Chinese modernization,while making arrangements for improving the legal protection of IP rights.Chinese courts adhered to the absolute leadership of the Party on judicial work concerning IP.Gained a deep understanding of the d

223、ecisive significance of establishing Comrade Xi Jinpings core position on the Party Central Committee and in the Party as a whole and establishing the guiding role of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era;Chinese courts endeavored to fully study,understand,and im

224、plement the guiding principles from the 20th National Congress.They have relied on Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era to enhance cohesion and forge the judicial soul.Upholding Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law in judicial practices involving IP,Chinese cou

225、rts extensively conducted the“Two Establishes”themed education program to consolidate the progress made in learning the Partys history and the education and rectification of political and legal teams.Furthermore,Chinese courts continued to promote the high-quality development of judicial work on IP.

226、中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 612023/4/17 15:51:3462-Chinese courts strictly adhered to stringent prohibitions such as the“Three Provisions”and the“Ten Prohibitions”for political and legal officials in the new era.In 2022,Chinese courts implemented the“list of prohibited industries”to regulate the post-

227、employment behaviors of the relevant officials,fully implemented the judicial accountability system,standardized the exercise of judicial power,and established the mechanism for the exercise of judicial power and supervision in the field of IP rights,thereby guaranteeing impartial and honest judicia

228、l practices.Last year,Chinese courts continued to intensify education and training in an effort to enhance the political,theoretical,and practical competence of judicial officers,carry forward their fighting spirit and build up their fighting ability.The Supreme Peoples Court held a press conference

229、 on the new judicial interpretations and judicial policies pertaining to IP rights to facilitate the accurate application of laws by local courts.In addition,the Court mobilized efforts to compile the IP and competition volume of the Application of the Civil Code of the Peoples Republic of China and

230、 compiled summaries of judicial opinions to guide their trial practices.The high peoples courts of Sichuan and Chongqing jointly organized a training course on judicial protection of IP.Under their guidance,the Chengdu Intermediate Peoples Court and the Chongqing No.1 Intermediate Peoples Court co-h

231、osted a forum for IP judges.The High Peoples Court of Yunnan Province and the 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 622023/4/17 15:51:3563-Yunnan Administration for Market Regulation jointly held a training course on administrative enforcement and judicial protection of IP rights to broaden the judicial horizon

232、s of IP judges.Focusing on the characteristics of border port cities,the Dandong Intermediate Peoples Court of Liaoning Province collaborated with the customs department to enhance trial officials knowledge of international brand protection.Conclusion2023 marks the first year for fully implementing

233、the guiding principles of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China.In IP trials,Chinese courts will continue to follow the guidance of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era and fully acted on the guiding principles from the 19th CPC National Con

234、gress and the plenary sessions of the 19th Party Central Committee and thoroughly implemented the guiding principles from the Partys 20th National Congress and the first and second plenary sessions of the 20th Central Committee.Chinese courts will practice Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law acros

235、s the board,gain a deep understanding of the decisive significance of establishing Comrade Xi Jinpings core position on the Party Central Committee and in the Party as a whole and establishing 中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 632023/4/17 15:51:3564-the guiding role of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with C

236、hinese Characteristics for a New Era;enhance their consciousness of the need to maintain political integrity,think in big-picture terms,follow the leadership core,and keep in alignment with the central Party leadership;stay confident in the path,theory,system,and culture of socialism with Chinese ch

237、aracteristics;and uphold Comrade Xi Jinpings core position on the Party Central Committee and in the Party as a whole and upheld the Central Committees authority and its centralized,unified leadership.Under the absolute leadership of the Party,Chinese courts will adhere resolutely to the path of soc

238、ialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics and endeavor to ensure that the people perceive fairness and justice in every judicial case.Chinese courts will strive to increase their political awareness,consider the big picture,enhance judicial fairness and efficiency,prioritize self-discipline an

239、d team building,and provide impartial judicial services to the people on a consistent basis.This year,Chinese courts will“strengthen legal protection of intellectual property rights in order to establish a foundational system for all-around innovation”,create an open,fair,just and non-discriminatory environment for the development of science and technology,as well as a world-class business environment that is market-oriented,law-based,and internationalized,thereby laying the groundwork for the construction of a fully modern socialist country.中國法院知識產權司法保護狀況（2022）.indd 642023/4/17 15:51:35